Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Endometriosis - Myths and Realities.

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Leslie V Farland, Samantha Davidson, Naoko Sasamoto, Andrew W Horne, Stacey A Missmer
{"title":"Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Endometriosis - Myths and Realities.","authors":"Leslie V Farland, Samantha Davidson, Naoko Sasamoto, Andrew W Horne, Stacey A Missmer","doi":"10.1007/s13669-020-00281-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is increasing interest in the long-term health and comorbid conditions associated with endometriosis for both women and neonates. The purpose of this review was to synthesize and discuss the current state of the literature investigating endometriosis and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Methodologic considerations for studying endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcomes include complexities regarding the comparison population, endometriosis definition, sample size, residual confounding, and interactions. The current research on endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcomes should be interpreted cautiously. To date, evidence suggests that endometriosis may be associated with higher risk of ectopic pregnancy, placenta previa, preterm birth, and cesarean section. While an association with miscarriage and stillbirth has been consistently observed, the relative risk was small.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Pregnant women with endometriosis may be at higher risk for certain adverse pregnancy outcomes and may therefore benefit from additional monitoring. However, additional research is needed to confirm these associations and should focus on ensuring studies have internal and external validity, as well as, investigate the potential for differences in endometriosis phenotypes. Moreover, future research should focus on understanding potential mechanisms of association and better understanding how early interventions, through increased monitoring or screening during pregnancy, may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44726,"journal":{"name":"Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports","volume":"9 1","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13669-020-00281-1","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-020-00281-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose of review: There is increasing interest in the long-term health and comorbid conditions associated with endometriosis for both women and neonates. The purpose of this review was to synthesize and discuss the current state of the literature investigating endometriosis and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Recent findings: Methodologic considerations for studying endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcomes include complexities regarding the comparison population, endometriosis definition, sample size, residual confounding, and interactions. The current research on endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcomes should be interpreted cautiously. To date, evidence suggests that endometriosis may be associated with higher risk of ectopic pregnancy, placenta previa, preterm birth, and cesarean section. While an association with miscarriage and stillbirth has been consistently observed, the relative risk was small.

Summary: Pregnant women with endometriosis may be at higher risk for certain adverse pregnancy outcomes and may therefore benefit from additional monitoring. However, additional research is needed to confirm these associations and should focus on ensuring studies have internal and external validity, as well as, investigate the potential for differences in endometriosis phenotypes. Moreover, future research should focus on understanding potential mechanisms of association and better understanding how early interventions, through increased monitoring or screening during pregnancy, may improve outcomes.

子宫内膜异位症的不良妊娠结局-神话和现实。
综述的目的:人们对子宫内膜异位症对妇女和新生儿的长期健康和合并症的影响越来越感兴趣。本综述的目的是综合和讨论研究子宫内膜异位症和不良妊娠结局风险的文献现状。研究子宫内膜异位症和不良妊娠结局的方法学考虑包括比较人群、子宫内膜异位症定义、样本量、残留混淆和相互作用的复杂性。目前有关子宫内膜异位症及不良妊娠结局的研究应谨慎解读。迄今为止,有证据表明子宫内膜异位症可能与宫外孕、前置胎盘、早产和剖宫产的高风险有关。虽然一直观察到与流产和死产有关,但相对风险很小。总结:患有子宫内膜异位症的孕妇可能存在某些不良妊娠结局的高风险,因此可能从额外的监测中获益。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些关联,并应侧重于确保研究具有内部和外部有效性,以及调查子宫内膜异位症表型差异的可能性。此外,未来的研究应侧重于了解潜在的关联机制,并更好地了解如何通过妊娠期间增加监测或筛查的早期干预来改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This journal aims to provide expert review articles on significant recent developments in obstetrics and gynecology. Presented in clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of conditions that compromise the health of women. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as endometriosis, infertility, menopause, prenatal medicine, and vulval and cervical lesions. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An Editorial Board of nearly 20 international members reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special importance to their country/region, and ensures that topics include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信