Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review.

Sandra AlTarawneh, Ghadeer Thalji, Lyndon Cooper
{"title":"Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review.","authors":"Sandra AlTarawneh,&nbsp;Ghadeer Thalji,&nbsp;Lyndon Cooper","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To update an existing systematic review assessing the clinical performance of full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The review was conducted according to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. An electronic search was conducted using the PubMed, Science Direct and Cochrane Library databases to identify clinical studies on full-arch implant-supported monolithic and minimally layered zirconia fixed dental prostheses. Human studies with a mean follow-up of at least 1 year and published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal up to April 2020 were included. Two independent examiners conducted the search and the review process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search generated 2110 articles. Thirty-three qualifying studies were retrieved for full-text evaluation and a total of 17 studies were included on the basis of preestablished criteria. All 17 studies reported satisfactory clinical and aesthetic outcomes. The technical complication rate related to this type of prosthesis is still minimal and survival rates are high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Full-arch dental implant restoration with monolithic zirconia is associated with high short-term success. Long-term data from studies with a strong level of evidence are still lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To update an existing systematic review assessing the clinical performance of full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses.

Materials and methods: The review was conducted according to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. An electronic search was conducted using the PubMed, Science Direct and Cochrane Library databases to identify clinical studies on full-arch implant-supported monolithic and minimally layered zirconia fixed dental prostheses. Human studies with a mean follow-up of at least 1 year and published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal up to April 2020 were included. Two independent examiners conducted the search and the review process.

Results: The search generated 2110 articles. Thirty-three qualifying studies were retrieved for full-text evaluation and a total of 17 studies were included on the basis of preestablished criteria. All 17 studies reported satisfactory clinical and aesthetic outcomes. The technical complication rate related to this type of prosthesis is still minimal and survival rates are high.

Conclusions: Full-arch dental implant restoration with monolithic zirconia is associated with high short-term success. Long-term data from studies with a strong level of evidence are still lacking.

全弓种植体支撑整体氧化锆修复体:最新的系统综述。
目的:更新现有的评估全弓种植体支撑整体氧化锆固定义齿临床性能的系统综述。材料和方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明中概述的指南进行评价。利用PubMed、Science Direct和Cochrane Library数据库进行电子检索,以确定全弓种植体支持的整体和最小层状氧化锆固定义齿的临床研究。纳入了平均随访时间至少为1年,并于2020年4月前在英文同行评审期刊上发表的人类研究。两名独立审查员进行了搜索和审查过程。结果:搜索产生了2110篇文章。检索了33项符合条件的研究进行全文评价,根据预先确定的标准共纳入了17项研究。所有17项研究均报告了令人满意的临床和美学结果。与这种类型的假体相关的技术并发症率仍然很低,存活率很高。结论:整体氧化锆全弓种植体修复具有较高的短期成功率。目前仍缺乏具有强有力证据的研究的长期数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信