Minimum standards of clinical practice for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2020-11-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10060
Tetsuya Takahashi, Michitaka Kato, Kengo Obata, Ryo Kozu, Toru Fujimoto, Koji Yamashita, Morihide Ando, Yusuke Kawai, Noriaki Kojima, Hiroshi Komatsu, Kensuke Nakamura, Yuhei Yamashita, Shane Patman, Akemi Utsunomiya, Osamu Nishida
{"title":"Minimum standards of clinical practice for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.","authors":"Tetsuya Takahashi,&nbsp;Michitaka Kato,&nbsp;Kengo Obata,&nbsp;Ryo Kozu,&nbsp;Toru Fujimoto,&nbsp;Koji Yamashita,&nbsp;Morihide Ando,&nbsp;Yusuke Kawai,&nbsp;Noriaki Kojima,&nbsp;Hiroshi Komatsu,&nbsp;Kensuke Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuhei Yamashita,&nbsp;Shane Patman,&nbsp;Akemi Utsunomiya,&nbsp;Osamu Nishida","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early mobilization and rehabilitation has become common and expectations for physical therapists working in intensive care units have increased in Japan. The objective of this study was to establish consensus-based minimum clinical practice standards for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan. It also aimed to make an international comparison of minimum clinical practice standards in this area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 54 experienced physical therapists gave informed consent and participated in this study. A modified Delphi method with questionnaires was used over three rounds. Participants rated 272 items as \"essential/unknown/non-essential\". Consensus was considered to be reached on items that over 70% of physical therapists rated as \"essential\" to clinical practice in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 272 items in the first round, 188 were deemed essential. In round 2, 11 of the 62 items that failed to reach consensus in round 1 were additionally deemed essential. No item was added to the \"essential\" consensus in round 3. In total, 199 items were therefore deemed essential as a minimum standard of clinical practice. Participants agreed that 42 items were not essential and failed to reach agreement on 31 others. Identified 199 items were different from those in the UK and Australia due to national laws, cultural and historical backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to develop a consensus-based minimum clinical practice standard for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"24 1","pages":"52-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111421/pdf/ptr-24-01-0052.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: Early mobilization and rehabilitation has become common and expectations for physical therapists working in intensive care units have increased in Japan. The objective of this study was to establish consensus-based minimum clinical practice standards for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan. It also aimed to make an international comparison of minimum clinical practice standards in this area.

Methods: In total, 54 experienced physical therapists gave informed consent and participated in this study. A modified Delphi method with questionnaires was used over three rounds. Participants rated 272 items as "essential/unknown/non-essential". Consensus was considered to be reached on items that over 70% of physical therapists rated as "essential" to clinical practice in the intensive care unit.

Results: Of the 272 items in the first round, 188 were deemed essential. In round 2, 11 of the 62 items that failed to reach consensus in round 1 were additionally deemed essential. No item was added to the "essential" consensus in round 3. In total, 199 items were therefore deemed essential as a minimum standard of clinical practice. Participants agreed that 42 items were not essential and failed to reach agreement on 31 others. Identified 199 items were different from those in the UK and Australia due to national laws, cultural and historical backgrounds.

Conclusions: This is the first study to develop a consensus-based minimum clinical practice standard for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.

日本重症监护病房物理治疗师临床实践的最低标准。
目的:在日本,早期动员和康复已经变得普遍,对在重症监护病房工作的物理治疗师的期望也有所增加。本研究的目的是为在日本重症监护病房工作的物理治疗师建立基于共识的最低临床实践标准。它还旨在对这一领域的最低临床实践标准进行国际比较。方法:共有54名经验丰富的物理治疗师知情同意并参与本研究。采用改进的德尔菲法和问卷调查法进行了三轮调查。参与者将272项物品分为“必要/未知/非必要”。超过70%的物理治疗师认为在重症监护病房的临床实践中“必不可少”的项目被认为达成了共识。结果:在第一轮的272项中,有188项被认为是必不可少的。在第二轮中,在第一轮未能达成共识的62个项目中,有11个项目被认为是必要的。第3轮的“基本”协商一致意见没有增加任何项目。因此,总共有199个项目被认为是临床实践的最低标准。与会者一致认为,有42个项目并非必不可少,另有31个项目未能达成一致。由于国家法律、文化和历史背景的不同,鉴定出的199个项目与英国和澳大利亚的不同。结论:这是第一个为日本重症监护室物理治疗师制定基于共识的最低临床实践标准的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信