Estimation of minimal clinically important difference for quadriceps and inspiratory muscle strength in older outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study.

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2020-10-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10049
Masahiro Iwakura, Kazuki Okura, Mika Kubota, Keiyu Sugawara, Atsuyoshi Kawagoshi, Hitomi Takahashi, Takanobu Shioya
{"title":"Estimation of minimal clinically important difference for quadriceps and inspiratory muscle strength in older outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Masahiro Iwakura,&nbsp;Kazuki Okura,&nbsp;Mika Kubota,&nbsp;Keiyu Sugawara,&nbsp;Atsuyoshi Kawagoshi,&nbsp;Hitomi Takahashi,&nbsp;Takanobu Shioya","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of quadriceps and inspiratory muscle strength after a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty-five COPD patients were included. Quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction (QMVC) was measured. We measured maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax), the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), the chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ) and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea score (mMRC). All measurements were conducted at baseline and at the end of the PRP. The MCID was calculated using anchor-based (using 6MWD, CRQ, and mMRC as possible anchor variables) and distribution-based (half standard deviation and 1.96 standard error of measurement) approaches. Changes in the five variables were compared in patients with and without changes in QMVC or PImax >MCID for each variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine COPD patients (age 75±6 years) were analysed. QMVC improved by 2.4 (95%CI 1.1-3.7) kgf, PImax by 5.8 (2.7-8.8) cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 6MWD by 21 (11-32) meters and CRQ by 3.9 (1.6-6.3) points. The MCID of QMVC and PImax was 3.3-7.5 kgf and 17.2-17.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, respectively. The MCID of QMVC (3.3 kgf) could differentiate individuals with significant improvement in 6MWD and PImax from those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MCID of QMVC (3.3 kgf) can identify a meaningful change in quadriceps muscle strength after a PRP. The MCID of PImax (17.2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) should be used with careful consideration, because the value is estimated using distributionbased method.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"24 1","pages":"35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111409/pdf/ptr-24-01-0035.pdf","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of quadriceps and inspiratory muscle strength after a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Method: Eighty-five COPD patients were included. Quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction (QMVC) was measured. We measured maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax), the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), the chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ) and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea score (mMRC). All measurements were conducted at baseline and at the end of the PRP. The MCID was calculated using anchor-based (using 6MWD, CRQ, and mMRC as possible anchor variables) and distribution-based (half standard deviation and 1.96 standard error of measurement) approaches. Changes in the five variables were compared in patients with and without changes in QMVC or PImax >MCID for each variable.

Results: Sixty-nine COPD patients (age 75±6 years) were analysed. QMVC improved by 2.4 (95%CI 1.1-3.7) kgf, PImax by 5.8 (2.7-8.8) cmH2O, 6MWD by 21 (11-32) meters and CRQ by 3.9 (1.6-6.3) points. The MCID of QMVC and PImax was 3.3-7.5 kgf and 17.2-17.6 cmH2O, respectively. The MCID of QMVC (3.3 kgf) could differentiate individuals with significant improvement in 6MWD and PImax from those without.

Conclusion: The MCID of QMVC (3.3 kgf) can identify a meaningful change in quadriceps muscle strength after a PRP. The MCID of PImax (17.2 cmH2O) should be used with careful consideration, because the value is estimated using distributionbased method.

估计老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者股四头肌和吸气肌力量的最小临床重要差异:一项前瞻性队列研究
目的:评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)家庭肺康复计划(PRP)后股四头肌和吸气肌力量的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。方法:85例慢性阻塞性肺病患者。测量股四头肌最大自主收缩(QMVC)。我们测量了最大吸气口压(PImax)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、慢性呼吸问卷(CRQ)和改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分(mMRC)。所有测量均在基线和PRP结束时进行。MCID的计算采用基于锚定(使用6MWD、CRQ和mMRC作为可能的锚定变量)和基于分布(一半标准差和1.96标准误差的测量)的方法。比较每个变量在QMVC或PImax >MCID改变和未改变的患者中5个变量的变化。结果:分析69例COPD患者(年龄75±6岁)。QMVC提高了2.4 (95%CI 1.1-3.7) kgf, PImax提高了5.8 (2.7-8.8)cmH2O, 6MWD提高了21(11-32)米,CRQ提高了3.9(1.6-6.3)点。QMVC和PImax的MCID分别为3.3 ~ 7.5 kgf和17.2 ~ 17.6 cmH2O。QMVC的MCID (3.3 kgf)可以区分6MWD和PImax有显著改善的个体与无显著改善的个体。结论:QMVC的MCID (3.3 kgf)可以识别PRP后股四头肌力量的有意义的变化。使用PImax (17.2 cmH2O)的MCID时应慎重考虑,因为该值是使用基于分布的方法估计的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信