Labor Market Concentration and Worker Contributions to Health Insurance Premiums.

Medical care research and review : MCRR Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-06 DOI:10.1177/10775587211012992
Mark K Meiselbach, Matthew D Eisenberg, Ge Bai, Aditi Sen, Gerard F Anderson
{"title":"Labor Market Concentration and Worker Contributions to Health Insurance Premiums.","authors":"Mark K Meiselbach,&nbsp;Matthew D Eisenberg,&nbsp;Ge Bai,&nbsp;Aditi Sen,&nbsp;Gerard F Anderson","doi":"10.1177/10775587211012992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In concentrated labor markets, where workers have fewer employers to choose from, employers may exploit their monopsony power by contributing less to workers' health benefits. This study examined if labor market concentration was associated with higher worker contributions to health plan premiums. We combined publicly available data from the Census to calculate labor market concentration and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance/Employer Component to determine premium contributions from 2010 to 2016 for metropolitan areas. After controlling for year fixed-effects and market characteristics, we found that higher labor market concentration was associated with higher worker contributions to health plan premiums, lower take-home income, and no change in employer contributions to premiums, consistent with the hypothesis that greater labor market concentration is associated with less generous health benefits. When evaluating the effects of mergers and acquisitions on labor markets, regulatory agencies should critically assess worker contributions to health insurance premiums.</p>","PeriodicalId":169610,"journal":{"name":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","volume":" ","pages":"198-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10775587211012992","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587211012992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In concentrated labor markets, where workers have fewer employers to choose from, employers may exploit their monopsony power by contributing less to workers' health benefits. This study examined if labor market concentration was associated with higher worker contributions to health plan premiums. We combined publicly available data from the Census to calculate labor market concentration and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance/Employer Component to determine premium contributions from 2010 to 2016 for metropolitan areas. After controlling for year fixed-effects and market characteristics, we found that higher labor market concentration was associated with higher worker contributions to health plan premiums, lower take-home income, and no change in employer contributions to premiums, consistent with the hypothesis that greater labor market concentration is associated with less generous health benefits. When evaluating the effects of mergers and acquisitions on labor markets, regulatory agencies should critically assess worker contributions to health insurance premiums.

Abstract Image

劳动力市场集中度与工人对健康保险费的贡献。
在集中的劳动力市场中,工人可选择的雇主较少,雇主可能会通过减少对工人健康福利的贡献来利用他们的垄断力量。这项研究考察了劳动力市场集中度是否与较高的工人健康计划保费有关。我们结合人口普查的公开数据来计算劳动力市场集中度,并结合医疗支出小组调查保险/雇主部分来确定2010年至2016年大都市地区的保费贡献。在控制了年度固定效应和市场特征后,我们发现,较高的劳动力市场集中度与较高的工人健康计划保费缴款、较低的实得收入以及雇主保费缴款没有变化相关,这与较高的劳动力市场集中度与较不慷慨的健康福利相关的假设一致。在评估合并和收购对劳动力市场的影响时,监管机构应严格评估工人对健康保险费的缴款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信