Retrospective Evaluation of Factors Affecting Lymph Node Retrieval Following Gastrectomies with Oncologic Intent.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Steven Fuchs, Itamar Ashkenazi
{"title":"Retrospective Evaluation of Factors Affecting Lymph Node Retrieval Following Gastrectomies with Oncologic Intent.","authors":"Steven Fuchs,&nbsp;Itamar Ashkenazi","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate lymphadenectomy is an important factor affecting survival in gastric cancer patients. Retrieval and examination of at least 15 lymph nodes is recommended in order to properly stage gastric malignancies. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the proportion of patients undergoing inadequate lymphadenectomies and possible risk factors for inadequate surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study that included patients, 18 years and older, who underwent gastrectomies with oncologic intent in the Hillel Yaffe Medical Center. We analyzed the association of demographic, clinical, and pathological variables with adequate number of lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The retrieval of less than 15 lymph nodes was reported in 51% (53/104) patients undergoing gastrectomies with oncologic intent. The extent of surgery was the only variable associated with inadequate lymphadenectomy on univariate analysis: subtotal/proximal versus total gastrectomy (P=0.047). Differences observed for previous surgery (P=0.193), T stage (P=0.053), N stage (P=0.051), and lymphovascular invasion (P=0.14) did not reach significance. Subtotal/proximal gastrectomy resulted in inadequate resection of lymph nodes in 56% of the patients, while this occurred in only 30% of the patients undergoing total gastrectomy (relative risk 1.865; 95% CI 0.93, 3.741). Logistic regression confirmed that only subtotal/proximal versus total gastrectomy was associated with inadequate number of lymph nodes resected (P=0.043).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>In this study we analyzed the association of patient, tumor, and surgery-related factors on adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing gastrectomies for possible gastric cancer. Larger extent of the surgery (total, rather than subtotal/proximal gastrectomy) was revealed to be the only indicator positively associated with adequate lymphadenectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8092954/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Adequate lymphadenectomy is an important factor affecting survival in gastric cancer patients. Retrieval and examination of at least 15 lymph nodes is recommended in order to properly stage gastric malignancies. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the proportion of patients undergoing inadequate lymphadenectomies and possible risk factors for inadequate surgery.

Methods: This was a retrospective study that included patients, 18 years and older, who underwent gastrectomies with oncologic intent in the Hillel Yaffe Medical Center. We analyzed the association of demographic, clinical, and pathological variables with adequate number of lymph nodes.

Results: The retrieval of less than 15 lymph nodes was reported in 51% (53/104) patients undergoing gastrectomies with oncologic intent. The extent of surgery was the only variable associated with inadequate lymphadenectomy on univariate analysis: subtotal/proximal versus total gastrectomy (P=0.047). Differences observed for previous surgery (P=0.193), T stage (P=0.053), N stage (P=0.051), and lymphovascular invasion (P=0.14) did not reach significance. Subtotal/proximal gastrectomy resulted in inadequate resection of lymph nodes in 56% of the patients, while this occurred in only 30% of the patients undergoing total gastrectomy (relative risk 1.865; 95% CI 0.93, 3.741). Logistic regression confirmed that only subtotal/proximal versus total gastrectomy was associated with inadequate number of lymph nodes resected (P=0.043).

Discussion and conclusion: In this study we analyzed the association of patient, tumor, and surgery-related factors on adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing gastrectomies for possible gastric cancer. Larger extent of the surgery (total, rather than subtotal/proximal gastrectomy) was revealed to be the only indicator positively associated with adequate lymphadenectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有肿瘤目的的胃切除术后影响淋巴结恢复的因素的回顾性评价。
背景:充分的淋巴结切除术是影响胃癌患者生存的重要因素。为了正确分期胃恶性肿瘤,推荐至少15个淋巴结的恢复和检查。本研究的目的是评估接受不适当淋巴结切除术的患者比例以及不适当手术的可能危险因素。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,包括18岁及以上在Hillel Yaffe医学中心接受肿瘤目的胃切除术的患者。我们分析了人口统计学、临床和病理变量与淋巴结数量充足的关系。结果:51%(53/104)有肿瘤目的的胃切除术患者的淋巴结切除少于15个。在单因素分析中,手术范围是与淋巴结切除不充分相关的唯一变量:胃次全切除术/近端切除术与全胃切除术(P=0.047)。既往手术(P=0.193)、T期(P=0.053)、N期(P=0.051)、淋巴血管侵犯(P=0.14)差异均无统计学意义。胃大部/近端切除术导致56%的患者未完全切除淋巴结,而在全胃切除术患者中仅30%出现这种情况(相对风险为1.865;95% ci 0.93, 3.741)。Logistic回归证实,只有次全/近端胃切除术与全胃切除术与淋巴结切除数量不足相关(P=0.043)。讨论与结论:在本研究中,我们分析了患者、肿瘤和手术相关因素与可能发生胃癌的胃切除术患者充分切除淋巴结的关系。更大的手术范围(全胃切除术,而不是胃次全切除术/近端切除术)是与充分的淋巴结切除术呈正相关的唯一指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信