Diagnostic Value Evaluation of Bed Ultrasound Compared with Wound Openness to Diagnose Tendon Rupture in Penetrating Hand Trauma at Taleghani Hospital in Kermanshah, 2019.

Amirhosein Meisami
{"title":"Diagnostic Value Evaluation of Bed Ultrasound Compared with Wound Openness to Diagnose Tendon Rupture in Penetrating Hand Trauma at Taleghani Hospital in Kermanshah, 2019.","authors":"Amirhosein Meisami","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2021.85570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound to diagnose the patients with tendon rupture of upper extremity referred to Taleghani Hospital's center of Kermanshah in 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a diagnostic value study which performed on 113 patients with non-fracture penetrating hand trauma. In the first stage, all patients have been diagnosed with tendon injury by a first-year resident and then ultrasound was performed by a trained 2<sup>nd</sup> year resident in emergency medicine ward and the results were recorded in a checklist. Further examination of the tendon was performed as well as exploring the site for the patients after the patient was transferred to the orthopaedic service. Final result was recorded in the checklist. Data were analysed by SPSS software and sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound have been calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that ultrasound was able to identify 73 patients of 77 individuals with tendon injury. Of the patients with complete rupture, 45 individuals were correctly diagnosed based on the results of surgery in ultrasound test. Ultrasound and surgical findings were significantly different. Of the 36 individuals without confirmed rupture in surgery, 10 cases were diagnosed with tendon rupture by ultrasound. Of 52 cases of complete rupture based on surgical findings, 45 individuals were correctly diagnosed based on the results of surgery. Twenty-one patients were correctly diagnosed based on ultrasound out of 25 cases of partial rupture based on surgical findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the results of the present study show that ultrasound is not very sensitive and specific in diagnosing of upper extremity tendon rupture and cannot be used as a reliable alternative in diagnosing of upper exteremity rupture; however, further studies is essential according to the limitations of this research. The limitations were low sample size in subgroups analysis based on the presence of complete or partial rupture and performing the ultrasound by an emergency medicine resident who is less experienced rather than radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.85570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound to diagnose the patients with tendon rupture of upper extremity referred to Taleghani Hospital's center of Kermanshah in 2019.

Methods: This was a diagnostic value study which performed on 113 patients with non-fracture penetrating hand trauma. In the first stage, all patients have been diagnosed with tendon injury by a first-year resident and then ultrasound was performed by a trained 2nd year resident in emergency medicine ward and the results were recorded in a checklist. Further examination of the tendon was performed as well as exploring the site for the patients after the patient was transferred to the orthopaedic service. Final result was recorded in the checklist. Data were analysed by SPSS software and sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound have been calculated.

Results: Results showed that ultrasound was able to identify 73 patients of 77 individuals with tendon injury. Of the patients with complete rupture, 45 individuals were correctly diagnosed based on the results of surgery in ultrasound test. Ultrasound and surgical findings were significantly different. Of the 36 individuals without confirmed rupture in surgery, 10 cases were diagnosed with tendon rupture by ultrasound. Of 52 cases of complete rupture based on surgical findings, 45 individuals were correctly diagnosed based on the results of surgery. Twenty-one patients were correctly diagnosed based on ultrasound out of 25 cases of partial rupture based on surgical findings.

Conclusion: Overall, the results of the present study show that ultrasound is not very sensitive and specific in diagnosing of upper extremity tendon rupture and cannot be used as a reliable alternative in diagnosing of upper exteremity rupture; however, further studies is essential according to the limitations of this research. The limitations were low sample size in subgroups analysis based on the presence of complete or partial rupture and performing the ultrasound by an emergency medicine resident who is less experienced rather than radiologists.

Abstract Image

床上超声与伤口开放对手部穿透性创伤肌腱断裂诊断价值的比较研究,2019。
目的:探讨超声诊断2019年在克尔曼沙阿塔莱格尼医院中心转诊的上肢肌腱断裂患者的敏感性、特异性和准确性。方法:对113例手部非骨折性穿透性创伤进行诊断价值研究。在第一阶段,所有患者都由一名一年级住院医师诊断为肌腱损伤,然后由一名训练有素的二年级住院医师在急诊病房进行超声检查,并将结果记录在检查表中。在患者转至骨科后,对患者的肌腱进行了进一步的检查,并对该部位进行了探查。最终结果记录在检查表中。采用SPSS软件对数据进行分析,计算超声的灵敏度和特异度。结果:超声诊断出77例肌腱损伤73例。在完全破裂的患者中,45例患者在超声检查中根据手术结果正确诊断。超声和手术表现有显著差异。在36例手术未确诊肌腱断裂的患者中,10例经超声诊断为肌腱断裂。在52例基于手术发现的完全性破裂中,45例基于手术结果被正确诊断。在25例部分破裂的病例中,有21例基于手术结果的超声诊断正确。结论:总的来说,本研究结果表明超声诊断上肢肌腱断裂的敏感性和特异性不高,不能作为诊断上肢肌腱断裂的可靠替代方法;然而,鉴于本研究的局限性,需要进一步的研究。局限性是基于完全或部分破裂存在的亚组分析的样本量小,并且由经验不足的急诊住院医师而不是放射科医生进行超声检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信