{"title":"Are Online Patient Reviews Associated With Health Care Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Andrew M Placona, Cheryl Rathert","doi":"10.1177/10775587211014534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although online patient reviews (OPRs) are ubiquitous, there has been debate about whether OPRs are associated with measures of health care outcomes. The majority of patients search for online information about a hospital or provider before scheduling an encounter, therefore, the extent to which OPRs are valid information is important. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the extent to which OPRs are associated with measures of patient experience, clinical quality, and other outcomes. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo, which yielded 32 studies. There were consistent positive correlations between OPRs and patient experience at both the organization and individual provider levels of analysis. However, associations between OPRs and quality measures were mixed. Organizational level OPRs may be more reliable than individual provider OPRs. In addition, the strength of association could be affected by the type of encounter setting, specialty, and specific measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":169610,"journal":{"name":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","volume":" ","pages":"3-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10775587211014534","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587211014534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Although online patient reviews (OPRs) are ubiquitous, there has been debate about whether OPRs are associated with measures of health care outcomes. The majority of patients search for online information about a hospital or provider before scheduling an encounter, therefore, the extent to which OPRs are valid information is important. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the extent to which OPRs are associated with measures of patient experience, clinical quality, and other outcomes. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo, which yielded 32 studies. There were consistent positive correlations between OPRs and patient experience at both the organization and individual provider levels of analysis. However, associations between OPRs and quality measures were mixed. Organizational level OPRs may be more reliable than individual provider OPRs. In addition, the strength of association could be affected by the type of encounter setting, specialty, and specific measures.
尽管在线患者评论(OPRs)无处不在,但关于OPRs是否与卫生保健结果的测量相关一直存在争议。大多数患者在预约会诊前都会在网上搜索有关医院或医疗服务提供者的信息,因此,门诊记录在多大程度上是有效信息是很重要的。我们对文献进行了系统的回顾,以检查opr与患者体验、临床质量和其他结果的测量的关联程度。我们检索了Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science和PsycInfo,共获得32项研究。在组织和个体提供者的分析水平上,OPRs和患者体验之间存在一致的正相关。然而,opr和质量测量之间的联系是混杂的。组织级opr可能比单个提供者opr更可靠。此外,联想的强度可能受到遭遇类型、背景、专业和具体措施的影响。