Flattening the Latent Growth Curve? Explaining Within-Person Changes in Employee Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-14 DOI:10.1007/s41542-021-00087-4
Jesse S Michel, Michael A Rotch, Jack E Carson, Nathan A Bowling, Nicole V Shifrin
{"title":"Flattening the Latent Growth Curve? Explaining Within-Person Changes in Employee Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Jesse S Michel,&nbsp;Michael A Rotch,&nbsp;Jack E Carson,&nbsp;Nathan A Bowling,&nbsp;Nicole V Shifrin","doi":"10.1007/s41542-021-00087-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the greatest global crises in modern history. In addition to recession and high unemployment, agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warn that stressors associated with a pandemic can cause increased strains, including difficulty concentrating, anxiety, and decreased mental health (CDC, 2020). Two general frameworks that explain these stressor-strain relationships over time include <i>stress-reaction</i> and <i>adaptation models</i>. Stress-reaction models suggest that stressors, such as heightened job demands due to the pandemic, accumulate over time and thus prolonged exposure to these stressors results in both immediate and long-term strain; conversely, adaptation models suggest that people adapt to stressors over time, such that strains produced by ongoing stressors tend to dissipate. After controlling for county-level COVID-19 cases, we found that (a) workers in general exhibited decreasing cognitive weariness and psychological symptoms over time, providing support for the adaptation model; (b) on-site workers experienced increasing physical fatigue over time, supporting the stress-reaction model among those workers; and (c) engaging in recovery behaviors was associated with improvements in cognitive weariness and psychological symptoms for all workers. We also found that our Time 1 outcomes were significantly different than pre-pandemic norms, such that our participants displayed lower initial levels of job-related burnout and higher initial levels of psychological symptoms than pre-pandemic norms. Furthermore, supplemental qualitative data support our quantitative findings for recovery behaviors. These findings have important implications for understanding workers' responses to the pandemic and they can help inform organizational practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":" ","pages":"247-275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41542-021-00087-4","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-021-00087-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the greatest global crises in modern history. In addition to recession and high unemployment, agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warn that stressors associated with a pandemic can cause increased strains, including difficulty concentrating, anxiety, and decreased mental health (CDC, 2020). Two general frameworks that explain these stressor-strain relationships over time include stress-reaction and adaptation models. Stress-reaction models suggest that stressors, such as heightened job demands due to the pandemic, accumulate over time and thus prolonged exposure to these stressors results in both immediate and long-term strain; conversely, adaptation models suggest that people adapt to stressors over time, such that strains produced by ongoing stressors tend to dissipate. After controlling for county-level COVID-19 cases, we found that (a) workers in general exhibited decreasing cognitive weariness and psychological symptoms over time, providing support for the adaptation model; (b) on-site workers experienced increasing physical fatigue over time, supporting the stress-reaction model among those workers; and (c) engaging in recovery behaviors was associated with improvements in cognitive weariness and psychological symptoms for all workers. We also found that our Time 1 outcomes were significantly different than pre-pandemic norms, such that our participants displayed lower initial levels of job-related burnout and higher initial levels of psychological symptoms than pre-pandemic norms. Furthermore, supplemental qualitative data support our quantitative findings for recovery behaviors. These findings have important implications for understanding workers' responses to the pandemic and they can help inform organizational practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

潜在增长曲线趋于平缓?解释COVID-19大流行期间员工幸福感的内部变化。
2019冠状病毒病大流行是现代历史上最大的全球危机之一。除了经济衰退和高失业率之外,疾病控制和预防中心等机构警告说,与大流行相关的压力源可能会导致压力增加,包括难以集中注意力、焦虑和心理健康下降(CDC, 2020)。随着时间的推移,解释这些压力-应变关系的两个一般框架包括压力反应和适应模型。压力反应模型表明,压力源,如大流行导致的工作需求增加,会随着时间的推移而积累,因此长期暴露于这些压力源会导致即时和长期紧张;相反,适应模型表明,随着时间的推移,人们会适应压力源,这样,由持续的压力源产生的压力往往会消散。在控制了县级COVID-19病例后,我们发现:(a)随着时间的推移,工人普遍表现出认知疲劳和心理症状的减少,为适应模型提供了支持;(b)现场工人随着时间的推移经历了越来越多的身体疲劳,支持了这些工人的压力反应模型;(c)参与恢复行为与所有工人认知疲劳和心理症状的改善有关。我们还发现,我们的Time 1结果与大流行前的规范有显著不同,因此,我们的参与者表现出较低的初始工作相关倦怠水平和较高的初始心理症状水平。此外,补充的定性数据支持了我们对恢复行为的定量研究结果。这些发现对了解工人对大流行的反应具有重要意义,并有助于为组织实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信