Fluoroscopic placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in COVID-19 patients in the prone position.

IF 4.1
JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-18 DOI:10.1002/jpen.2192
Hordur Mar Kolbeinsson, James Veldkamp, James D Paauw
{"title":"Fluoroscopic placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in COVID-19 patients in the prone position.","authors":"Hordur Mar Kolbeinsson,&nbsp;James Veldkamp,&nbsp;James D Paauw","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an increase in patients requiring enteral feeding access while undergoing proning for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated the safety and feasibility of fluoroscopy-guided nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube placement in the prone position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent fluoroscopic placement of NJ feeding tubes at a single institution between March 2020 and December 2020. Primary end points were success rate and number of attempts. Chi-squared and Fischer exact tests were used to compare prone and supine groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 patients were included in the study: 53 patients received NJ feeding tubes while prone and 157 while supine. All but one patient in the prone group had ARDS secondary to COVID-19, whereas 47 (30.3%) had COVID-19 in the supine group. The rate of successful placement was 94.3% in the prone group and 100% in the supine group. Mean number of attempts was 1.1 (SD, ±0.4) in the prone and 1.0 (SD, ±0.1) in the supine group (P = .14). Prone patients had a longer median fluoroscopy time (69 s, interquartile range [IQR] = 92; vs 48 s, IQR = 43; P < .001) and received a higher radiation dose during the procedure (47 mGy, IQR = 50; vs 25 mGy, IQR = 33; P = .004). No procedural complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided NJ feeding tube placement in prone patients is feasible and safe. Patient positioning should not delay obtaining postpyloric feeding access.</p>","PeriodicalId":520701,"journal":{"name":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"556-560"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jpen.2192","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an increase in patients requiring enteral feeding access while undergoing proning for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated the safety and feasibility of fluoroscopy-guided nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube placement in the prone position.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent fluoroscopic placement of NJ feeding tubes at a single institution between March 2020 and December 2020. Primary end points were success rate and number of attempts. Chi-squared and Fischer exact tests were used to compare prone and supine groups.

Results: A total of 210 patients were included in the study: 53 patients received NJ feeding tubes while prone and 157 while supine. All but one patient in the prone group had ARDS secondary to COVID-19, whereas 47 (30.3%) had COVID-19 in the supine group. The rate of successful placement was 94.3% in the prone group and 100% in the supine group. Mean number of attempts was 1.1 (SD, ±0.4) in the prone and 1.0 (SD, ±0.1) in the supine group (P = .14). Prone patients had a longer median fluoroscopy time (69 s, interquartile range [IQR] = 92; vs 48 s, IQR = 43; P < .001) and received a higher radiation dose during the procedure (47 mGy, IQR = 50; vs 25 mGy, IQR = 33; P = .004). No procedural complications were reported.

Conclusion: Fluoroscopy-guided NJ feeding tube placement in prone patients is feasible and safe. Patient positioning should not delay obtaining postpyloric feeding access.

COVID-19患者俯卧位下透视放置鼻空肠饲管。
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)导致在接受严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)治疗时需要肠内喂养的患者增加。我们探讨了透视引导下鼻空肠(NJ)饲管俯卧位放置的安全性和可行性。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2020年3月至2020年12月在同一家机构接受透视置入NJ饲管的所有患者。主要终点为成功率和尝试次数。采用卡方检验和Fischer精确检验比较俯卧组和仰卧组。结果:共有210例患者纳入研究,其中53例患者俯卧时使用NJ饲管,157例患者仰卧时使用NJ饲管。俯卧位组中除1例患者外,其余患者均发生了继发于COVID-19的ARDS,而仰卧位组中有47例(30.3%)发生了COVID-19。俯卧位组置入成功率94.3%,仰卧位组置入成功率100%。俯卧组平均尝试次数为1.1次(SD,±0.4),仰卧组平均尝试次数为1.0次(SD,±0.1)(P = .14)。俯卧位患者的中位透视时间较长(69 s,四分位数差[IQR] = 92;vs 48秒,IQR = 43;P < .001),并且在手术过程中接受了更高的辐射剂量(47 mGy, IQR = 50;vs 25 mGy, IQR = 33;P = .004)。无手术并发症报告。结论:透视引导下放置NJ饲管在俯卧病人中是可行且安全的。患者体位不应延迟获得幽门后喂食通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信