Collaborative Medication Reviews to Identify Inappropriate Prescribing in Pre-Admission Medications at Emergency Department Short-Term Ward.

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-04-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IPRP.S280523
Ercan Celikkayalar, Juha Puustinen, Joni Palmgren, Marja Airaksinen
{"title":"Collaborative Medication Reviews to Identify Inappropriate Prescribing in Pre-Admission Medications at Emergency Department Short-Term Ward.","authors":"Ercan Celikkayalar, Juha Puustinen, Joni Palmgren, Marja Airaksinen","doi":"10.2147/IPRP.S280523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Collaborative medication reviews (CMR) have been shown to reduce inappropriate prescribing (IP) in various settings. This study aimed at describing a CMR practice in an emergency department (ED) short-term ward in Finland to investigate IP in pre-admission medications.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Pre-admission medications were collaboratively reviewed for all the adult ED admissions within a 5-month study period in 2016. Types of IP were inductively categorized, and descriptive statistics were used to show the incidence and type of IP events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre-admission medications of 855 adult ED patients were reviewed by the pharmacist, with 113 IP events identified in 83 (9.7%) of the patients. The majority (81%, n=67) of these patients were older adults (≥65 years). Of these 94 IP events identified in 67 older patients, 58 (62%) were confirmed by the ED physicians. The following 3 main categories were inductively developed for the types of identified and confirmed IP events: 1) Misprescribing (prescription of medications that significantly increase the risk of adverse drug events); 2) Overprescribing (prescription of medications for which no clear clinical indications exist); and 3) Underprescribing (omission of potentially beneficial medications that are clinically indicated for treatment or prevention of a disease). Misprescribing was the most common type of IP identified (79% of the identified and 72% confirmed IP events). Benzodiazepines (29%) and antidepressants (28%) were involved in 33 out of 58 (57%) confirmed IP events. Medications with strong anticholinergic effects were involved in 19% of the confirmed IP events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CMR practice was able to identify IP in pre-admission medications of about one-tenth of ED patients. Older patients using benzodiazepines and drugs with strong anticholinergic effects should be paid special attention to ED admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45655,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","volume":"10 ","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/21/d7/iprp-10-23.PMC8075306.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S280523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Collaborative medication reviews (CMR) have been shown to reduce inappropriate prescribing (IP) in various settings. This study aimed at describing a CMR practice in an emergency department (ED) short-term ward in Finland to investigate IP in pre-admission medications.

Patients and methods: Pre-admission medications were collaboratively reviewed for all the adult ED admissions within a 5-month study period in 2016. Types of IP were inductively categorized, and descriptive statistics were used to show the incidence and type of IP events.

Results: The pre-admission medications of 855 adult ED patients were reviewed by the pharmacist, with 113 IP events identified in 83 (9.7%) of the patients. The majority (81%, n=67) of these patients were older adults (≥65 years). Of these 94 IP events identified in 67 older patients, 58 (62%) were confirmed by the ED physicians. The following 3 main categories were inductively developed for the types of identified and confirmed IP events: 1) Misprescribing (prescription of medications that significantly increase the risk of adverse drug events); 2) Overprescribing (prescription of medications for which no clear clinical indications exist); and 3) Underprescribing (omission of potentially beneficial medications that are clinically indicated for treatment or prevention of a disease). Misprescribing was the most common type of IP identified (79% of the identified and 72% confirmed IP events). Benzodiazepines (29%) and antidepressants (28%) were involved in 33 out of 58 (57%) confirmed IP events. Medications with strong anticholinergic effects were involved in 19% of the confirmed IP events.

Conclusion: The CMR practice was able to identify IP in pre-admission medications of about one-tenth of ED patients. Older patients using benzodiazepines and drugs with strong anticholinergic effects should be paid special attention to ED admissions.

Abstract Image

通过合作用药审查,识别急诊科短期病房入院前用药的不当处方。
目的:合作用药审查(CMR)已被证明可减少各种情况下的不当处方(IP)。本研究旨在描述芬兰一家急诊科(ED)短期病房的CMR实践,以调查入院前用药的IP情况:在 2016 年为期 5 个月的研究期间,对急诊科所有入院成人的入院前用药进行了合作审查。对IP类型进行归纳分类,并使用描述性统计来显示IP事件的发生率和类型:药剂师对 855 名成人急诊患者的入院前用药进行了审查,在 83 名患者(9.7%)中发现了 113 例 IP 事件。这些患者中的大多数(81%,n=67)是老年人(≥65 岁)。在 67 名老年患者中发现的 94 例 IP 事件中,有 58 例(62%)得到了急诊科医生的确认。根据已发现和确认的 IP 事件类型,归纳出以下 3 个主要类别:1) 错开处方(开具会显著增加药物不良事件风险的药物处方);2) 处方过多(开具无明确临床适应症的药物处方);3) 处方过少(遗漏开具临床上适用于治疗或预防疾病的潜在有益药物处方)。开错处方是最常见的 IP 类型(占已发现 IP 事件的 79%,占已确认 IP 事件的 72%)。在 58 例确认的 IP 事件中,有 33 例(57%)涉及苯二氮卓类药物(29%)和抗抑郁药物(28%)。在19%的确诊IP事件中,涉及具有强烈抗胆碱能作用的药物:CMR实践能够在约十分之一的急诊患者入院前的用药中发现IP。使用苯二氮卓类药物和具有强烈抗胆碱能作用的药物的老年患者在急诊入院时应受到特别关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信