Estimation of sex from measurements of foramen magnum region in a contemporary Jordanian population: A computed tomographic study.

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Heba Kalbouneh, Nidaa Mubarak, Jamil Shwaqfeh, Mohammad Nawaiseh, Omar Ashour, Ahmad Muneer Alkhatib, Bilal Odeh, Waleed Mahafzah, Mohammad Alsalem
{"title":"Estimation of sex from measurements of foramen magnum region in a contemporary Jordanian population: A computed tomographic study.","authors":"Heba Kalbouneh, Nidaa Mubarak, Jamil Shwaqfeh, Mohammad Nawaiseh, Omar Ashour, Ahmad Muneer Alkhatib, Bilal Odeh, Waleed Mahafzah, Mohammad Alsalem","doi":"10.1127/anthranz/2021/1460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have shown variability in basicranial measurements between populations. Therefore, each population should have specific standards to optimize the accuracy of identification. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum and occipital condyles measurements using 3D multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), and to assess their utility and reliability for sex estimation in a Jordanian population by means of discriminant function analyses. A total of 500 MDCT scans (288 males and 212 females) were used and a total of 8 basicranial measurements were studied (3 measurements were derived from foramen magnum, and 5 measurements were derived from occipital condyles). Significant sexual dimorphism was found in all basicranial measurements. The most dimorphic variables were length of occipital condyle and maximum bicondylar distance. Including all variables, multivariate and stepwise functions gave an overall accuracy of 77.8% and 78.6%, respectively. However, the multivariate analyses conducted separately for measurements derived from foramen magnum and occipital condyles gave lower overall accuracy of 68.6% and 70.0%, respectively. Basicranial measurements derived from foramen magnum alone predicted males with relatively higher accuracy but were poor at predicting females in the sample (82.6% were males, 49.5% were females, sex bias 33.1%). Adding occipital condyles measurements to the multivariate analysis increased the percentage of correct sexing in females and reduced considerably the sex bias (78.8% male, 76.4% female, sex bias 1.4%). Discriminant function analysis using basicranial measurements derived from both foramen magnum and occipital condyles measurements can be utilized to estimate sex in our population.","PeriodicalId":46008,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologischer Anzeiger","volume":"78 4","pages":"317-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologischer Anzeiger","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/2021/1460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have shown variability in basicranial measurements between populations. Therefore, each population should have specific standards to optimize the accuracy of identification. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum and occipital condyles measurements using 3D multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), and to assess their utility and reliability for sex estimation in a Jordanian population by means of discriminant function analyses. A total of 500 MDCT scans (288 males and 212 females) were used and a total of 8 basicranial measurements were studied (3 measurements were derived from foramen magnum, and 5 measurements were derived from occipital condyles). Significant sexual dimorphism was found in all basicranial measurements. The most dimorphic variables were length of occipital condyle and maximum bicondylar distance. Including all variables, multivariate and stepwise functions gave an overall accuracy of 77.8% and 78.6%, respectively. However, the multivariate analyses conducted separately for measurements derived from foramen magnum and occipital condyles gave lower overall accuracy of 68.6% and 70.0%, respectively. Basicranial measurements derived from foramen magnum alone predicted males with relatively higher accuracy but were poor at predicting females in the sample (82.6% were males, 49.5% were females, sex bias 33.1%). Adding occipital condyles measurements to the multivariate analysis increased the percentage of correct sexing in females and reduced considerably the sex bias (78.8% male, 76.4% female, sex bias 1.4%). Discriminant function analysis using basicranial measurements derived from both foramen magnum and occipital condyles measurements can be utilized to estimate sex in our population.
从当代约旦人口的枕骨大孔区域测量估计性别:一项计算机断层扫描研究。
几项研究表明,人群之间的颅底测量存在差异。因此,每个群体都应该有特定的标准,以优化识别的准确性。本研究的目的是利用三维多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)评估枕骨大孔和枕髁测量的性别二态性,并通过判别函数分析评估其在约旦人群中性别估计的实用性和可靠性。共使用500张MDCT扫描(288名男性,212名女性),研究了8个颅底测量(3个测量来自枕骨大孔,5个测量来自枕髁)。在所有的颅底测量中都发现了显著的性别二态性。最具二态性的变量是枕髁长度和最大双髁距离。包括所有变量在内,多元函数和逐步函数的总体准确率分别为77.8%和78.6%。然而,分别对枕骨大孔和枕髁的测量结果进行的多变量分析显示,总体准确率较低,分别为68.6%和70.0%。仅从枕骨大孔获得的颅底测量对男性的预测准确度相对较高,但对样本中女性的预测准确度较差(男性为82.6%,女性为49.5%,性别偏差为33.1%)。在多变量分析中加入枕髁测量增加了女性正确性别的百分比,并大大减少了性别偏见(男性78.8%,女性76.4%,性别偏见1.4%)。基于枕骨大孔和枕髁测量的颅底测量的判别函数分析可以用来估计我们人群的性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AA is an international journal of human biology. It publishes original research papers on all fields of human biological research, that is, on all aspects, theoretical and practical of studies of human variability, including application of molecular methods and their tangents to cultural and social anthropology. Other than research papers, AA invites the submission of case studies, reviews, technical notes and short reports. AA is available online, papers must be submitted online to ensure rapid review and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信