Youth and parent perceptions on participating in specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation options: A qualitative timeline effect analysis.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karen Hurtubise, Astrid Brousselle, Melanie Noel, Abbie Jordan, Jo White, Nivez Rasic, Chantal Camden
{"title":"Youth and parent perceptions on participating in specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation options: A qualitative timeline effect analysis.","authors":"Karen Hurtubise, Astrid Brousselle, Melanie Noel, Abbie Jordan, Jo White, Nivez Rasic, Chantal Camden","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2020.1858709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Little is known about how the specialized treatment journey is perceived by youth with pain-related disability and their parents. <b>Aims</b>: Describe and compare the treatment effects and outcomes as perceived by youth and their parents enrolled in intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) or multimodal treatment (MMT). <b>Methods</b>: Eleven IIPT youth and five parents and three MMT youth and five parents were recruited. All were asked to complete a treatment journey timeline, followed by separately conducted semistructured interviews. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. <b>Results</b>: The main themes spanned the treatment trajectory. All participants described similar initial struggles (Theme 1). Positive and negative treatment effects associated with acquisitions and disruptions (Theme 2), and outcomes post-discharge related to supports and realities (Theme 3) emerged. Knowledge, skills, and support acquisition during treatment and feeling empowered and confident to self-manage postdischarge were identified as IIPT benefits. However, the change effort and life disruptions required and the difficulty transitioning to real life postprogram were acknowledged as detrimental IIPT impacts. Continuing with life as usual and maintaining supports in daily contexts (e.g., school personnel, friends) were reported MMT benefits. However, the challenges of managing pain, treatment adherence within the competing demands of daily realities, and the lack of support to integrate strategies were emphasized as detrimental MMT impacts. <b>Conclusions</b>: Detailed impacts of two specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation interventions on the lives of youth with pain-related disability and their parents are described. The treatments benefits and previously unexplored detrimental effects are unveiled.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7951173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2020.1858709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how the specialized treatment journey is perceived by youth with pain-related disability and their parents. Aims: Describe and compare the treatment effects and outcomes as perceived by youth and their parents enrolled in intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) or multimodal treatment (MMT). Methods: Eleven IIPT youth and five parents and three MMT youth and five parents were recruited. All were asked to complete a treatment journey timeline, followed by separately conducted semistructured interviews. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. Results: The main themes spanned the treatment trajectory. All participants described similar initial struggles (Theme 1). Positive and negative treatment effects associated with acquisitions and disruptions (Theme 2), and outcomes post-discharge related to supports and realities (Theme 3) emerged. Knowledge, skills, and support acquisition during treatment and feeling empowered and confident to self-manage postdischarge were identified as IIPT benefits. However, the change effort and life disruptions required and the difficulty transitioning to real life postprogram were acknowledged as detrimental IIPT impacts. Continuing with life as usual and maintaining supports in daily contexts (e.g., school personnel, friends) were reported MMT benefits. However, the challenges of managing pain, treatment adherence within the competing demands of daily realities, and the lack of support to integrate strategies were emphasized as detrimental MMT impacts. Conclusions: Detailed impacts of two specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation interventions on the lives of youth with pain-related disability and their parents are described. The treatments benefits and previously unexplored detrimental effects are unveiled.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

青少年和家长对参与专门的多学科疼痛康复方案的看法:定性时间轴效应分析。
背景:人们对患有疼痛相关残疾的青少年及其父母如何看待专业治疗过程知之甚少。目的:描述并比较参加疼痛强化跨学科治疗(IIPT)或多模式治疗(MMT)的青少年及其家长所感受到的治疗效果和结果。方法:招募了 11 名 IIPT 青少年和 5 名家长,以及 3 名 MMT 青少年和 5 名家长。所有人都被要求填写一份治疗历程时间表,然后分别进行半结构式访谈。采用反思性主题分析法对访谈记录进行分析。结果:主要的主题跨越了治疗轨迹。所有参与者都描述了相似的最初挣扎(主题 1)。出现了与获得和中断相关的积极和消极治疗效果(主题 2),以及与支持和现实相关的出院后结果(主题 3)。在治疗过程中获得知识、技能和支持,以及在出院后感到有能力和信心进行自我管理,被认为是 IIPT 的益处。然而,改变所需的努力和对生活的干扰,以及出院后向现实生活过渡的困难被认为是 IIPT 的不利影响。据报告,继续像往常一样生活和在日常生活中保持支持(如学校工作人员、朋友)是精神创伤和痛苦管理法的益处。然而,管理疼痛的挑战、在日常现实的竞争需求中坚持治疗以及缺乏整合策略的支持被强调为 MMT 的不利影响。结论:本文详细介绍了两种专门的多学科疼痛康复干预措施对患有疼痛相关残疾的青少年及其父母生活的影响。揭示了治疗的益处和以前未曾探索过的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信