Stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of oligometastatic gynecological malignancy in the abdomen and pelvis: A single-institution experience.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Timothy D Smile, Chandana A Reddy, George Qiao-Guan, W Ian Winter, Kevin L Stephans, Neil M Woody, Ehsan H Balagamwala, Sudha R Amarnath, Anthony Magnelli, Mariam M AlHilli, Chad M Michener, Haider Mahdi, Robert L DeBernardo, Peter G Rose, Sheen S Cherian
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of oligometastatic gynecological malignancy in the abdomen and pelvis: A single-institution experience.","authors":"Timothy D Smile,&nbsp;Chandana A Reddy,&nbsp;George Qiao-Guan,&nbsp;W Ian Winter,&nbsp;Kevin L Stephans,&nbsp;Neil M Woody,&nbsp;Ehsan H Balagamwala,&nbsp;Sudha R Amarnath,&nbsp;Anthony Magnelli,&nbsp;Mariam M AlHilli,&nbsp;Chad M Michener,&nbsp;Haider Mahdi,&nbsp;Robert L DeBernardo,&nbsp;Peter G Rose,&nbsp;Sheen S Cherian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>Metastasis-directed therapy with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the setting of oligometastatic disease is a rapidly evolving paradigm given ongoing improvements in systemic therapies and diagnostic modalities. However, SBRT to targets in the abdomen and pelvis is historically associated with concerns about toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT to the abdomen and pelvis for women with oligometastases from primary gynecological tumors.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>From our IRB-approved registry, all patients who were treated with SBRT between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Oligometastatic disease was defined as 1 to 5 discrete foci of clinical metastasis radiographically diagnosed by positron emission tomography (PET) and/or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The primary endpoint was local control at 12 months. Local and distant control rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time intervals for development of local progression and distant progression were calculated based on follow up visits with re-staging imaging. Acute and late toxicity outcomes were determined based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 34 women with 43 treated lesions. Median age was 68 years (range 32-82), and median follow up time was 12 months (range 0.2-54.0). Most common primary tumor sites were ovarian (n=12), uterine (n=11), and cervical (n=7). Median number of previous lines of systemic therapy agents at time of SBRT was 2 (range 0-10). Overall, SBRT was delivered to 1 focus of oligometastasis in 29 cases, 2 foci in 2 cases, 3 foci in 2 cases, and 4 foci in 1 case. All patients were treated comprehensively with SBRT to all sites of oligometastasis. Median prescription dose was 24 Gy (range 18-54 Gy) in 3 fractions (range 3-6) to a median prescription isodose line of 83.5% (range 52-95). Local control by lesion at 12 and 24 months was 92.5% for both time points. Local failure was observed in three treated sites among two patients, two of which were at 11 months in one patient, and the other at 30 months. Systemic control rate was 60.2% at 12 months. Overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 85% and 70.2%, respectively. Acute grade 2 toxicities included nausea (n=3), and there were no grade > 3 acute toxicities. Late grade 1 toxicities included diarrhea (n=1) and fatigue (n=1), and there were no grade > 2 toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBRT to oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies in the abdomen and pelvis is feasible with encouraging preliminary safety and local control outcomes. This approach is associated with excellent local control and low rates of toxicity during our follow-up interval. Further investigations into technique, dose-escalation and utilization are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"7 3","pages":"189-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055243/pdf/rsbrt-7-197.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: Metastasis-directed therapy with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the setting of oligometastatic disease is a rapidly evolving paradigm given ongoing improvements in systemic therapies and diagnostic modalities. However, SBRT to targets in the abdomen and pelvis is historically associated with concerns about toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT to the abdomen and pelvis for women with oligometastases from primary gynecological tumors.

Materials/methods: From our IRB-approved registry, all patients who were treated with SBRT between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Oligometastatic disease was defined as 1 to 5 discrete foci of clinical metastasis radiographically diagnosed by positron emission tomography (PET) and/or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The primary endpoint was local control at 12 months. Local and distant control rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time intervals for development of local progression and distant progression were calculated based on follow up visits with re-staging imaging. Acute and late toxicity outcomes were determined based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results: We identified 34 women with 43 treated lesions. Median age was 68 years (range 32-82), and median follow up time was 12 months (range 0.2-54.0). Most common primary tumor sites were ovarian (n=12), uterine (n=11), and cervical (n=7). Median number of previous lines of systemic therapy agents at time of SBRT was 2 (range 0-10). Overall, SBRT was delivered to 1 focus of oligometastasis in 29 cases, 2 foci in 2 cases, 3 foci in 2 cases, and 4 foci in 1 case. All patients were treated comprehensively with SBRT to all sites of oligometastasis. Median prescription dose was 24 Gy (range 18-54 Gy) in 3 fractions (range 3-6) to a median prescription isodose line of 83.5% (range 52-95). Local control by lesion at 12 and 24 months was 92.5% for both time points. Local failure was observed in three treated sites among two patients, two of which were at 11 months in one patient, and the other at 30 months. Systemic control rate was 60.2% at 12 months. Overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 85% and 70.2%, respectively. Acute grade 2 toxicities included nausea (n=3), and there were no grade > 3 acute toxicities. Late grade 1 toxicities included diarrhea (n=1) and fatigue (n=1), and there were no grade > 2 toxicities.

Conclusion: SBRT to oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies in the abdomen and pelvis is feasible with encouraging preliminary safety and local control outcomes. This approach is associated with excellent local control and low rates of toxicity during our follow-up interval. Further investigations into technique, dose-escalation and utilization are warranted.

立体定向放射治疗妇科腹部和骨盆少转移性恶性肿瘤:单一机构的经验。
目的/目的:考虑到全身治疗和诊断方式的不断改进,在低转移性疾病的背景下,立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)是一种快速发展的范式。然而,对腹部和骨盆目标的SBRT历来与毒性担忧有关。本研究的目的是评估SBRT腹腔和骨盆治疗原发性妇科肿瘤少转移灶的安全性和有效性。材料/方法:从我们的irb批准的注册表中,确定了2014年至2020年期间接受SBRT治疗的所有患者。少转移性疾病被定义为通过正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和/或计算机断层扫描(CT)成像诊断的1至5个临床转移灶。主要终点是12个月时的局部控制。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计局部和远程控制率。局部进展和远处进展的时间间隔根据随访和重新分期成像计算。急性和晚期毒性结果根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE) 5.0版确定。结果:我们确定了34名妇女43个治疗病变。中位年龄为68岁(范围32-82),中位随访时间为12个月(范围0.2-54.0)。最常见的原发肿瘤部位为卵巢(n=12)、子宫(n=11)和宫颈(n=7)。在SBRT时,既往全身治疗药物的中位数为2(范围0-10)。总体而言,SBRT用于29例少转移灶的1个病灶,2例2个病灶,2例3个病灶,1例4个病灶。所有患者均采用SBRT对所有少转移部位进行综合治疗。处方中位剂量为24 Gy(范围18-54 Gy),分为3个部分(范围3-6),处方中位等剂量线为83.5%(范围52-95)。12个月和24个月病灶局部控制率均为92.5%。2例患者中有3个治疗部位出现局部失败,其中1例患者11个月时出现2个局部失败,另1例患者30个月时出现2个局部失败。12个月时全身控制率为60.2%。12个月和24个月的总生存率分别为85%和70.2%。急性2级毒性包括恶心(n=3),没有> 3级急性毒性。晚期1级毒性包括腹泻(n=1)和疲劳(n=1),没有2级以上的毒性。结论:SBRT治疗妇科腹部和骨盆低转移性恶性肿瘤是可行的,初步安全性和局部控制效果令人鼓舞。这种方法在随访期间具有良好的局部控制和低毒性。有必要对技术、剂量增加和利用进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信