Safety and efficacy of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
J.-W. Wang, X.-Y. Li, C.-H. Li, J.-F. Liu, H. Li, Y.-Y. Tian, B.-L. Gao
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis","authors":"J.-W. Wang,&nbsp;X.-Y. Li,&nbsp;C.-H. Li,&nbsp;J.-F. Liu,&nbsp;H. Li,&nbsp;Y.-Y. Tian,&nbsp;B.-L. Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.nrl.2021.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The performance of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent deployed following balloon angioplasty is unknown in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, and this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the LVIS stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery M1 segment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-five patients were enrolled with 35 atherosclerotic stenoses at the M1 segment. The stenosis was about 75% in 16 patients, 80% in 15, and 90% in the rest four. The LVIS stent was used to treat these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The success rate of stenting was 97.1%. The stenting procedure was failed in one patient because of intraprocedural dissection of the stenotic (75%) segment, resulting in a 30-day periprocedural complication rate of 2.9% (1/35). Before stenting, the stenosis rate ranged 75%–90% (mean 78.9%<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.7%), and after stenting, the diameter of the stented segment was significantly (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001) increased to 1.5–3.4<!--> <!-->mm (mean 2.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.32<!--> <!-->mm) ranging 68.2%–100% (mean 94.0%<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.8%) of the normal arterial diameter, with the residual stenosis ranging 0–31.8% (median 4.8%, IQR 2.4%–7.3%). Follow-up was performed at 6–20 months (mean 8.5) after stenting. One patient (2.9%) had occlusion of the stented M1 segment with no symptoms, and two patients (5.7%) had slight asymptomatic instent stenosis (40%) at the M1 segment, with the instent restenosis and occlusion rate of 8.6% (3/35).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The braided LVIS stent can be safely applied for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery with good safety and efficacy immediately after stenting and at follow-up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19300,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"38 8","pages":"Pages 521-529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.02.013","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485321000517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

The performance of the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent deployed following balloon angioplasty is unknown in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, and this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the LVIS stent in treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery M1 segment.

Methods

Thirty-five patients were enrolled with 35 atherosclerotic stenoses at the M1 segment. The stenosis was about 75% in 16 patients, 80% in 15, and 90% in the rest four. The LVIS stent was used to treat these patients.

Results

The success rate of stenting was 97.1%. The stenting procedure was failed in one patient because of intraprocedural dissection of the stenotic (75%) segment, resulting in a 30-day periprocedural complication rate of 2.9% (1/35). Before stenting, the stenosis rate ranged 75%–90% (mean 78.9% ± 4.7%), and after stenting, the diameter of the stented segment was significantly (P < 0.0001) increased to 1.5–3.4 mm (mean 2.1 ± 0.32 mm) ranging 68.2%–100% (mean 94.0% ± 5.8%) of the normal arterial diameter, with the residual stenosis ranging 0–31.8% (median 4.8%, IQR 2.4%–7.3%). Follow-up was performed at 6–20 months (mean 8.5) after stenting. One patient (2.9%) had occlusion of the stented M1 segment with no symptoms, and two patients (5.7%) had slight asymptomatic instent stenosis (40%) at the M1 segment, with the instent restenosis and occlusion rate of 8.6% (3/35).

Conclusion

The braided LVIS stent can be safely applied for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery with good safety and efficacy immediately after stenting and at follow-up.

低剖面可视化管腔内支架治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的安全性和有效性
目的低剖面可视化管腔内支架(LVIS)治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的疗效尚不清楚,本研究旨在探讨LVIS支架治疗大脑中动脉M1段颅内动脉粥样硬化性病变的安全性和有效性。方法35例M1段动脉粥样硬化性狭窄患者。16例患者的狭窄率约为75%,15例为80%,其余4例为90%。LVIS支架用于治疗这些患者。结果支架置入成功率为97.1%,其中1例因术中剥离狭窄段(75%)而失败,30天围手术期并发症发生率为2.9%(1/35)。支架置入前,狭窄率为75%-90%(平均78.9%±4.7%),支架置入后,支架段的直径显著(P<;0.0001)增加到1.5–3.4 mm(平均2.1±0.32 mm),范围为正常动脉直径的68.2%-100%(平均94.0%±5.8%),残余狭窄范围为0–31.8%(中位数4.8%,IQR 2.4%–7.3%)。支架植入后6–20个月(平均8.5个月)进行随访。1名患者(2.9%)支架M1段闭塞,无症状,2名患者(5.7%)M1段轻度无症状狭窄(40%),支架再狭窄和闭塞率为8.6%(3/35)。结论编织型LVIS支架可安全应用于治疗大脑中动脉颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄,支架置入后即刻及随访安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia
Neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
135
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurología es la revista oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neurología y publica, desde 1986 contribuciones científicas en el campo de la neurología clínica y experimental. Los contenidos de Neurología abarcan desde la neuroepidemiología, la clínica neurológica, la gestión y asistencia neurológica y la terapéutica, a la investigación básica en neurociencias aplicada a la neurología. Las áreas temáticas de la revistas incluyen la neurologia infantil, la neuropsicología, la neurorehabilitación y la neurogeriatría. Los artículos publicados en Neurología siguen un proceso de revisión por doble ciego a fin de que los trabajos sean seleccionados atendiendo a su calidad, originalidad e interés y así estén sometidos a un proceso de mejora. El formato de artículos incluye Editoriales, Originales, Revisiones y Cartas al Editor, Neurología es el vehículo de información científica de reconocida calidad en profesionales interesados en la neurología que utilizan el español, como demuestra su inclusión en los más prestigiosos y selectivos índices bibliográficos del mundo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信