Rechazo del tratamiento para la anorexia nerviosa: opinión de los profesionales de la salud mental sobre voluntariedad y estrés de rol

Q3 Medicine
José-Luis Fernández-Hernández , Pablo Herranz-Hernández , Laura Segovia-Torres
{"title":"Rechazo del tratamiento para la anorexia nerviosa: opinión de los profesionales de la salud mental sobre voluntariedad y estrés de rol","authors":"José-Luis Fernández-Hernández ,&nbsp;Pablo Herranz-Hernández ,&nbsp;Laura Segovia-Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The hospitalisation of patients with anorexia nervosa poses an important bioethical quandary and can generate stress for the healthcare professionals. Our goal was to know and analyse the opinion of mental health professionals on some conditions for applying the involuntary hospitalisation of patients with anorexia nervosa.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional descriptive observational study on a sample of 270 mental health professionals, using an ad hoc questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 10.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The professionals state that, in some cases, the patient accepts admission reluctantly: 7.74 (95% <span>C</span>I, 7.55-7.93). In the event of physical risk, it is difficult for them to combine respect for the patient's autonomy and the duty of care: 6.06 (95% CI, 5.70-6.41) and the relationship with the patient is largely oriented to convince them: 7.18 (95% CI, 6.91-7.46). They do not decide on the suitability of the participation of non-medical staff in the decision: 5.13 (95% CI, 4.75-5.52), or if the indication should correspond to someone other than the doctor in charge of their care: 4.79 (95% CI, 4.39-5.19). They reject the possibility of conscientious objection: 4.05 (95% CI, 3.68-4.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mental health professionals are subject to ambiguous work demands, which affects their care dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages S123-S131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021000469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

The hospitalisation of patients with anorexia nervosa poses an important bioethical quandary and can generate stress for the healthcare professionals. Our goal was to know and analyse the opinion of mental health professionals on some conditions for applying the involuntary hospitalisation of patients with anorexia nervosa.

Methods

Cross-sectional descriptive observational study on a sample of 270 mental health professionals, using an ad hoc questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 10.

Results

The professionals state that, in some cases, the patient accepts admission reluctantly: 7.74 (95% CI, 7.55-7.93). In the event of physical risk, it is difficult for them to combine respect for the patient's autonomy and the duty of care: 6.06 (95% CI, 5.70-6.41) and the relationship with the patient is largely oriented to convince them: 7.18 (95% CI, 6.91-7.46). They do not decide on the suitability of the participation of non-medical staff in the decision: 5.13 (95% CI, 4.75-5.52), or if the indication should correspond to someone other than the doctor in charge of their care: 4.79 (95% CI, 4.39-5.19). They reject the possibility of conscientious objection: 4.05 (95% CI, 3.68-4.41).

Conclusions

Mental health professionals are subject to ambiguous work demands, which affects their care dynamics.

拒绝接受厌食症治疗:精神卫生专业人员对自愿性和角色压力的看法
导言:神经性厌食症患者住院治疗是一个重要的生物伦理难题,会给医护人员带来压力。我们的目标是了解和分析精神卫生专业人员对神经性厌食症患者实施非自愿住院治疗的一些条件的看法。方法对 270 名精神卫生专业人员进行横断面描述性观察研究,采用 0-10 分的特别问卷:7.74(95% 置信区间,7.55-7.93)。在有身体风险的情况下,他们很难将尊重病人的自主权和照顾病人的责任结合起来:6.06(95% CI,5.70-6.41),与病人的关系在很大程度上是说服他们的导向:7.18(95% CI,6.91-7.46)。他们并不决定非医务人员是否适合参与决定:5.13(95% CI,4.75-5.52),也不决定是否应由负责其护理的医生以外的人作出指示:4.79(95% CI,4.39-5.19)。他们拒绝出于良心拒绝的可能性:结论精神卫生专业人员的工作要求不明确,这影响了他们的护理动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信