Threshold dose of cow's milk in sensitization to casein higher than those of casein and β-lactoglobulin in children with cow's milk allergy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Yukiko Otsuka, Hideyuki Morita, Yuka Kimura, Rikako Mori, Kumiko Miyazaki, Yuko Shimokawa, Koji Tatabayashi, Michinori Funato, Hideo Kaneko
{"title":"Threshold dose of cow's milk in sensitization to casein higher than those of casein and β-lactoglobulin in children with cow's milk allergy.","authors":"Yukiko Otsuka, Hideyuki Morita, Yuka Kimura, Rikako Mori, Kumiko Miyazaki, Yuko Shimokawa, Koji Tatabayashi, Michinori Funato, Hideo Kaneko","doi":"10.12932/AP-220720-0927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent treatment for food allergies involves the intake of allergy-causing foods at doses lower than the threshold dose determined by the oral food challenge (OFC). For a more successful treatment, it is necessary to identify a biomarker to establish safer doses of allergens in foods consumed at home.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aim to investigate whether the pattern of sensitization to cow's milk (CM) is related to the threshold dose of CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients with sensitization to casein (casein-specific IgE titer ≥ 0.7 UA/ml) and who have undergone the CM OFC test from July 2013 to July 2015 were enrolled. They were examined for the presence or absence of sensitization to β-lactoglobulin (BLG) (BLG-specific IgE ≥ 0.7 UA/ml). They were divided into two groups, namely, the only-casein-specific IgE-positive (C) group, and both casein- and BLG-specific IgE-positive (C + B) group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The C group had 26 patients and the C + B group had 24. Both the CM- and casein-specific IgE titers were higher in the C + B group than in the C group. The positivity rates determined from OFC test results were 53.8 and 87.5%, and the threshold doses of CM were 88.7 and 31.1 ml in the C and C + B groups, respectively. In patients with low casein-specific IgE titers (≤ 10 UA/ml), the C + B group showed a significantly lower threshold dose of CM than the C group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that children with CM allergy sensitized to casein alone have a higher threshold dose than those sensitized to both casein and BLG.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":"341-345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-220720-0927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent treatment for food allergies involves the intake of allergy-causing foods at doses lower than the threshold dose determined by the oral food challenge (OFC). For a more successful treatment, it is necessary to identify a biomarker to establish safer doses of allergens in foods consumed at home.

Objective: In this study, we aim to investigate whether the pattern of sensitization to cow's milk (CM) is related to the threshold dose of CM.

Methods: Fifty patients with sensitization to casein (casein-specific IgE titer ≥ 0.7 UA/ml) and who have undergone the CM OFC test from July 2013 to July 2015 were enrolled. They were examined for the presence or absence of sensitization to β-lactoglobulin (BLG) (BLG-specific IgE ≥ 0.7 UA/ml). They were divided into two groups, namely, the only-casein-specific IgE-positive (C) group, and both casein- and BLG-specific IgE-positive (C + B) group.

Results: The C group had 26 patients and the C + B group had 24. Both the CM- and casein-specific IgE titers were higher in the C + B group than in the C group. The positivity rates determined from OFC test results were 53.8 and 87.5%, and the threshold doses of CM were 88.7 and 31.1 ml in the C and C + B groups, respectively. In patients with low casein-specific IgE titers (≤ 10 UA/ml), the C + B group showed a significantly lower threshold dose of CM than the C group.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that children with CM allergy sensitized to casein alone have a higher threshold dose than those sensitized to both casein and BLG.

牛奶过敏儿童对酪蛋白过敏的阈值剂量高于酪蛋白和β-乳球蛋白的阈值剂量。
背景:近期治疗食物过敏的方法包括摄入致敏食物,但其剂量应低于口服食物挑战(OFC)确定的阈值剂量。为了使治疗更加成功,有必要确定一种生物标志物,以确定在家食用的食物中过敏原的更安全剂量:本研究旨在探讨对牛奶(CM)过敏的模式是否与 CM 的阈值剂量有关:方法:选取 2013 年 7 月至 2015 年 7 月期间对酪蛋白过敏(酪蛋白特异性 IgE 滴度≥ 0.7 UA/ml)并接受过 CM OFC 测试的 50 名患者作为研究对象。他们接受了是否对β-乳球蛋白(BLG)(BLG 特异性 IgE ≥ 0.7 UA/ml)过敏的检查。他们被分为两组,即仅酪蛋白特异性 IgE 阳性组(C 组)和酪蛋白及 BLG 特异性 IgE 阳性组(C + B 组):C组有26名患者,C + B组有24名患者。C + B 组的 CM 和酪蛋白特异性 IgE 滴度均高于 C 组。根据 OFC 检测结果确定的阳性率分别为 53.8%和 87.5%,C 组和 C + B 组的 CM 临界剂量分别为 88.7 毫升和 31.1 毫升。在酪蛋白特异性 IgE 滴度较低(≤ 10 UA/ml)的患者中,C + B 组的 CM 临界剂量明显低于 C 组:我们的研究结果表明,仅对酪蛋白过敏的中药过敏患儿的阈值剂量高于同时对酪蛋白和BLG过敏的患儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747 APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume. APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand. The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信