Similar or dissimilar? Influence of similarity between distraction tasks and target tasks on unconscious thought.

Jiansheng Li, Yanlin Guo, Kai Shi, Xuejing Li, Jiarong Xie
{"title":"Similar or dissimilar? Influence of similarity between distraction tasks and target tasks on unconscious thought.","authors":"Jiansheng Li,&nbsp;Yanlin Guo,&nbsp;Kai Shi,&nbsp;Xuejing Li,&nbsp;Jiarong Xie","doi":"10.1002/ijop.12762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distraction tasks are known to affect the unconscious-thought (UT) effect. However, the relationship between two task types, namely distraction and target tasks, and their effect on UT effect have not been examined in previous studies. In this study, we assessed whether simultaneously performing dissimilar distraction and target tasks are beneficial to information processing by UT. In Experiment 1, the target task was an Alternate Use Task (speech task). For the similar-task test, the UT group was assigned the speech 1-back task (speech task) as the distraction task; for the dissimilar-task test, the UT group was assigned the spatial 1-back task (spatial task) as the distraction task. The results of the experiment revealed that under dissimilar tasks, the UT group not only provided more answers but also provided answers that were more novel. For Experiment 2, the target task was changed to Creative Mental Synthesis Task (spatial task) to replicate the results of Experiment 1. The results demonstrated that the dissimilarity between the distraction and target tasks facilitates the UT.</p>","PeriodicalId":351827,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie","volume":" ","pages":"783-790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ijop.12762","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Distraction tasks are known to affect the unconscious-thought (UT) effect. However, the relationship between two task types, namely distraction and target tasks, and their effect on UT effect have not been examined in previous studies. In this study, we assessed whether simultaneously performing dissimilar distraction and target tasks are beneficial to information processing by UT. In Experiment 1, the target task was an Alternate Use Task (speech task). For the similar-task test, the UT group was assigned the speech 1-back task (speech task) as the distraction task; for the dissimilar-task test, the UT group was assigned the spatial 1-back task (spatial task) as the distraction task. The results of the experiment revealed that under dissimilar tasks, the UT group not only provided more answers but also provided answers that were more novel. For Experiment 2, the target task was changed to Creative Mental Synthesis Task (spatial task) to replicate the results of Experiment 1. The results demonstrated that the dissimilarity between the distraction and target tasks facilitates the UT.

相似还是不同?分散任务与目标任务相似性对无意识思维的影响。
众所周知,分散注意力的任务会影响无意识思维(UT)效应。然而,以往的研究并未考察分心和目标任务两种任务类型之间的关系及其对UT效应的影响。在本研究中,我们评估了同时执行不同的分心和目标任务是否有利于UT的信息加工。实验1的目标任务为交替使用任务(言语任务)。在相似任务测试中,UT组被分配语音1-back任务(语音任务)作为分心任务;在异任务测试中,UT组被分配空间1-back任务(空间任务)作为分散注意力任务。实验结果显示,在不同的任务下,UT组不仅提供了更多的答案,而且提供了更新颖的答案。实验2将目标任务改为创造性心理综合任务(空间任务),以重复实验1的结果。结果表明,分散注意力和目标任务之间的差异促进了UT的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信