Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence, Prehospital Evaluation, and Presentation of Ischemic Stroke at a Nonurban Comprehensive Stroke Center.

IF 1.8 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Stroke Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2021-01-18 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6624231
Cesar Velasco, Brandon Wattai, Scott Buchle, Alicia Richardson, Varun Padmanaban, Kathy J Morrison, Raymond Reichwein, Ephraim Church, Scott D Simon, Kevin M Cockroft
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence, Prehospital Evaluation, and Presentation of Ischemic Stroke at a Nonurban Comprehensive Stroke Center.","authors":"Cesar Velasco,&nbsp;Brandon Wattai,&nbsp;Scott Buchle,&nbsp;Alicia Richardson,&nbsp;Varun Padmanaban,&nbsp;Kathy J Morrison,&nbsp;Raymond Reichwein,&nbsp;Ephraim Church,&nbsp;Scott D Simon,&nbsp;Kevin M Cockroft","doi":"10.1155/2021/6624231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many reports have described a decrease in the numbers of patients seeking medical attention for typical emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. These reports primarily relate to urban areas with widespread community transmission. The impact of COVID-19 on nonurban areas with minimal community transmission is less well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a prospectively maintained prehospital quality improvement database, we reviewed our hospital EMS transports with a diagnosis of stroke from January to April 2019 (baseline) and January to April 2020 (pandemic). We compared the volume of patients, transport/presentation times, severity of presenting symptoms, and final diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In January, February, March, and April 2019, 10, 11, 17, and 19 patients, respectively, were transported in comparison to 19, 14, 10, and 8 during the same months in 2020. From January through April 2019, there was a 53% increase in transports, compared to a 42% decrease during the same months in 2020, constituting significantly different trend-line slopes (3.30; 95% CI 0.48-6.12 versus -3.70; 95% CI -5.76--1.64, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and symptom severity were mostly similar over the two time periods, and the number of patients with a final diagnosis of stroke was also similar. However, the median interval from EMS dispatch to ED arrival for patients with a final diagnosis of stroke was significantly longer in January to April 2020 (50 ± 11.7 min) compared to the same time period in 2019 (42 ± 8.2 min, <i>p</i> = 0.01). <i>Discussion/Conclusion</i>. Our data indicate a decrease in patient transport volumes and longer intervals to EMS activation for suspected stroke care. These results suggest that even in a nonurban location without widespread community transmission, patients may be delaying or avoiding care for severe illnesses such as stroke. Clinicians and public health officials should not ignore the potential impact of pandemic-like illnesses even in areas of relatively low disease prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6624231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814411/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6624231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction: Many reports have described a decrease in the numbers of patients seeking medical attention for typical emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. These reports primarily relate to urban areas with widespread community transmission. The impact of COVID-19 on nonurban areas with minimal community transmission is less well understood.

Methods: Using a prospectively maintained prehospital quality improvement database, we reviewed our hospital EMS transports with a diagnosis of stroke from January to April 2019 (baseline) and January to April 2020 (pandemic). We compared the volume of patients, transport/presentation times, severity of presenting symptoms, and final diagnosis.

Results: In January, February, March, and April 2019, 10, 11, 17, and 19 patients, respectively, were transported in comparison to 19, 14, 10, and 8 during the same months in 2020. From January through April 2019, there was a 53% increase in transports, compared to a 42% decrease during the same months in 2020, constituting significantly different trend-line slopes (3.30; 95% CI 0.48-6.12 versus -3.70; 95% CI -5.76--1.64, p = 0.001). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and symptom severity were mostly similar over the two time periods, and the number of patients with a final diagnosis of stroke was also similar. However, the median interval from EMS dispatch to ED arrival for patients with a final diagnosis of stroke was significantly longer in January to April 2020 (50 ± 11.7 min) compared to the same time period in 2019 (42 ± 8.2 min, p = 0.01). Discussion/Conclusion. Our data indicate a decrease in patient transport volumes and longer intervals to EMS activation for suspected stroke care. These results suggest that even in a nonurban location without widespread community transmission, patients may be delaying or avoiding care for severe illnesses such as stroke. Clinicians and public health officials should not ignore the potential impact of pandemic-like illnesses even in areas of relatively low disease prevalence.

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行对非城市综合卒中中心缺血性卒中发病率、院前评估和表现的影响
导读:许多报告都描述了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,因典型紧急情况寻求医疗救助的患者数量减少。这些报告主要涉及具有广泛社区传播的城市地区。COVID-19对社区传播最少的非城市地区的影响尚不清楚。方法:使用前瞻性维护的院前质量改进数据库,回顾2019年1月至4月(基线)和2020年1月至4月(大流行)诊断为卒中的医院EMS转运。我们比较了患者数量、转运/呈现时间、呈现症状的严重程度和最终诊断。结果:2019年1月、2月、3月和4月,转运患者分别为10人、11人、17人和19人,而2020年同期分别为19人、14人、10人和8人。从2019年1月到4月,运输量增长了53%,而2020年同期下降了42%,构成了明显不同的趋势线斜率(3.30;95% CI 0.48-6.12对-3.70;95% CI -5.76—1.64,p = 0.001)。在两个时间段内,患者的人口统计、合并症和症状严重程度基本相似,最终诊断为中风的患者数量也相似。然而,与2019年同期(42±8.2分钟,p = 0.01)相比,2020年1月至4月,最终诊断为卒中的患者从EMS送到ED的中位间隔(50±11.7分钟)明显更长。讨论和结论。我们的数据表明,减少病人运输量和更长的间隔EMS激活疑似卒中护理。这些结果表明,即使在没有广泛社区传播的非城市地区,患者也可能延迟或避免对中风等严重疾病进行治疗。临床医生和公共卫生官员不应忽视类似大流行疾病的潜在影响,即使在疾病患病率相对较低的地区也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信