The hierarchical structure of error-related negativities elicited from affective and social stimuli and their relations to personality traits.

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-01-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2020.15
T Suzuki, K D Novak, B Ait Oumeziane, D Foti, D B Samuel
{"title":"The hierarchical structure of error-related negativities elicited from affective and social stimuli and their relations to personality traits.","authors":"T Suzuki,&nbsp;K D Novak,&nbsp;B Ait Oumeziane,&nbsp;D Foti,&nbsp;D B Samuel","doi":"10.1017/pen.2020.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychophysiological measures have become increasingly accessible to researchers and many have properties that indicate their use as individual difference indicators. For example, the error-related negativity (ERN), an event-related potential (ERP) thought to reflect error-monitoring processes, has been related to individual differences, such as Neuroticism and Conscientiousness traits. Although various tasks have been used to elicit the ERN, only a few studies have investigated its variability across tasks when examining the relations between the ERN and personality traits. In this project, we examined the relations of the ERN elicited from four variants of the Flanker task (Arrow, Social, Unpleasant, and Pleasant) that were created to maximize the differences in their relevance to personality traits. A sample of 93 participants with a history of treatment for psychopathology completed the four tasks as well as self-report measures of the general and maladaptive five-factor model (FFM) traits. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of ERN amplitudes indicated that three of the four tasks (Arrow, Social, and Unpleasant) were unidimensional. Another set of CFAs indicated that a general factor underlies the ERN elicited from all tasks as well as unique task-specific variances. The correlations of estimated latent ERN scores and personality traits did not reflect the hypothesized correlation patterns. Variability across tasks and the hierarchical model of the ERN may aid in understanding psychopathology dimensions and in informing future endeavors integrating the psychophysiological methods into the study of personality. Recommendations for future research on psychophysiological indicators as individual differences are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2020.15","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2020.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Psychophysiological measures have become increasingly accessible to researchers and many have properties that indicate their use as individual difference indicators. For example, the error-related negativity (ERN), an event-related potential (ERP) thought to reflect error-monitoring processes, has been related to individual differences, such as Neuroticism and Conscientiousness traits. Although various tasks have been used to elicit the ERN, only a few studies have investigated its variability across tasks when examining the relations between the ERN and personality traits. In this project, we examined the relations of the ERN elicited from four variants of the Flanker task (Arrow, Social, Unpleasant, and Pleasant) that were created to maximize the differences in their relevance to personality traits. A sample of 93 participants with a history of treatment for psychopathology completed the four tasks as well as self-report measures of the general and maladaptive five-factor model (FFM) traits. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of ERN amplitudes indicated that three of the four tasks (Arrow, Social, and Unpleasant) were unidimensional. Another set of CFAs indicated that a general factor underlies the ERN elicited from all tasks as well as unique task-specific variances. The correlations of estimated latent ERN scores and personality traits did not reflect the hypothesized correlation patterns. Variability across tasks and the hierarchical model of the ERN may aid in understanding psychopathology dimensions and in informing future endeavors integrating the psychophysiological methods into the study of personality. Recommendations for future research on psychophysiological indicators as individual differences are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

情感和社会刺激引起的错误相关负性的层次结构及其与人格特质的关系。
研究人员越来越容易获得心理生理学指标,其中许多指标具有表明其作为个体差异指标的特性。例如,错误相关负性(ERN),一种反映错误监测过程的事件相关电位(ERP),与个体差异有关,如神经质和尽责性特征。虽然有各种各样的任务被用来诱发ERN,但在检查ERN与人格特质之间的关系时,只有少数研究调查了其在不同任务中的可变性。在这个项目中,我们研究了从侧卫任务的四个变体(Arrow, Social, Unpleasant, and Pleasant)中得出的ERN之间的关系,这些变体的创建是为了最大限度地提高它们与人格特质的相关性差异。93名有精神病理治疗史的参与者完成了四项任务以及一般和适应不良五因素模型(FFM)特征的自我报告测量。ERN振幅的验证性因子分析(CFAs)表明,四个任务中的三个(Arrow、Social和Unpleasant)是单维的。另一组cfa表明,从所有任务以及特定任务的独特差异中得出的ERN背后有一个一般因素。估计的潜在ERN得分与人格特质的相关性不反映假设的相关模式。任务间的可变性和ERN的层次模型可能有助于理解精神病理学维度,并为今后将心理生理学方法整合到人格研究中提供信息。讨论了个体差异对今后心理生理指标研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信