Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction.

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2020-12-07 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/7289701
Shaarif Bashir, Mudassar Hussain, Azhar Ali Khan, Usman Hassan, Khawaja Sajid Mushtaq, Maryam Hameed, Usman Ayub Awan
{"title":"Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction.","authors":"Shaarif Bashir,&nbsp;Mudassar Hussain,&nbsp;Azhar Ali Khan,&nbsp;Usman Hassan,&nbsp;Khawaja Sajid Mushtaq,&nbsp;Maryam Hameed,&nbsp;Usman Ayub Awan","doi":"10.1155/2020/7289701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>163 renal transplant biopsies, reported between 2014 and 2019 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were evaluated with respect to demographics, clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 163 patients, 26 (16%) were females and 137 (84%) were males with a mean age of 34 ± 7 years. 53 (32.5%) cases were of rejection (ABMR and TCMR), 1 (0.6%) was borderline, 15 were of IFTA, and rest of 94 cases (57.7%) belonged to the others category. SCr (serum creatinine) in cases of rejection was 3.85 ± 0.55 mg/dl. Causes of early graft dysfunction included active ABMR (7.1 ± 4.7 months), acute TCMR (5.5 months), and acute tubular necrosis (after 6 ± 2.2 months of transplant) while the causes of late rejection were CNIT and IFTA (34 ± 4.7 and 35 ± 7.8 months, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Renal graft dysfunction still remains a concerning area for both clinicians and patients. Biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing the exact cause of graft dysfunction and in planning further management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"7289701"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/7289701","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7289701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction.

Aim: To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction.

Materials and methods: 163 renal transplant biopsies, reported between 2014 and 2019 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were evaluated with respect to demographics, clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features.

Results: Of 163 patients, 26 (16%) were females and 137 (84%) were males with a mean age of 34 ± 7 years. 53 (32.5%) cases were of rejection (ABMR and TCMR), 1 (0.6%) was borderline, 15 were of IFTA, and rest of 94 cases (57.7%) belonged to the others category. SCr (serum creatinine) in cases of rejection was 3.85 ± 0.55 mg/dl. Causes of early graft dysfunction included active ABMR (7.1 ± 4.7 months), acute TCMR (5.5 months), and acute tubular necrosis (after 6 ± 2.2 months of transplant) while the causes of late rejection were CNIT and IFTA (34 ± 4.7 and 35 ± 7.8 months, respectively).

Conclusion: Renal graft dysfunction still remains a concerning area for both clinicians and patients. Biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing the exact cause of graft dysfunction and in planning further management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肾移植病理学:移植物功能障碍原因的人口统计学特征和组织病理学分析。
背景:肾移植已成为终末期肾病患者的首选治疗方式;然而,一小部分病例出现移植物功能障碍。目的:评价肾移植活检结果,分析肾移植功能障碍的各种原因。材料和方法:从人口统计学、临床、组织学和免疫组织化学特征方面对2014年至2019年报告的163例符合纳入标准的肾移植活检进行评估。结果:163例患者中,女性26例(16%),男性137例(84%),平均年龄34±7岁。排斥反应(ABMR和TCMR) 53例(32.5%),边缘性1例(0.6%),IFTA 15例(15),其余94例(57.7%)属于其他类型。排斥反应组SCr(血清肌酐)为3.85±0.55 mg/dl。早期移植物功能障碍的原因包括活动性ABMR(7.1±4.7个月)、急性TCMR(5.5个月)和急性肾小管坏死(移植后6±2.2个月),晚期排斥反应的原因是CNIT和IFTA(分别为34±4.7和35±7.8个月)。结论:移植肾功能障碍仍然是临床医生和患者关注的问题。活检仍然是诊断移植物功能障碍的确切原因和规划进一步治疗的金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Nephrology
International Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nephrology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of kidney diseases and associated disorders. The journal welcomes submissions related to cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pathophysiology of renal disease and progression, clinical nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信