A technique to increase the treatment plan indices in GammaKnife: A retrospective study.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Ngangom Robert, Manjul Tripathi, Gaurav Trivedi, R P Chauhan, Arun Oinam, Ranjit Singh, Parsee Tomar
{"title":"A technique to increase the treatment plan indices in GammaKnife: A retrospective study.","authors":"Ngangom Robert,&nbsp;Manjul Tripathi,&nbsp;Gaurav Trivedi,&nbsp;R P Chauhan,&nbsp;Arun Oinam,&nbsp;Ranjit Singh,&nbsp;Parsee Tomar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study was to find the optimal values of priority in the inverse planning module of Leksell GammaPlan which would give better treatment plan indices in GammaKnife SRS. The study showed that the best optimised setting of the weighting or priority in the inverse planning module of Leksell GammaPlan were 0.6 for coverage, 0.3 for gradient index and 0.5 for beam on time. Inverse plans (Hybrid Inverse Plan, HIP) which were made using this optimal priority setting were compared with forward plans (FP) with all 95% coverage. The results showed that the average selectivity index (SI) was 83.05±9.68 for FP and 85.35±8.03 for HIP. So, SI improved in the HIP technique by about 2.3% compare to FP. Similarly, average gradient index (GI) for FP and HIP were respectively 2.82±0.23 and 2.76±0.33. And the average beam on time (BT) of FP and HIP were, respectively, 48.15±23.14 min and 48.35±18.09 min. So, all plan indices show improvement in the hybrid inverse planning technique over forward plans. Consequently, this will improve the quality of patient treatment in GammaKnife.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"7 3","pages":"245-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055234/pdf/rsbrt-7-248.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was to find the optimal values of priority in the inverse planning module of Leksell GammaPlan which would give better treatment plan indices in GammaKnife SRS. The study showed that the best optimised setting of the weighting or priority in the inverse planning module of Leksell GammaPlan were 0.6 for coverage, 0.3 for gradient index and 0.5 for beam on time. Inverse plans (Hybrid Inverse Plan, HIP) which were made using this optimal priority setting were compared with forward plans (FP) with all 95% coverage. The results showed that the average selectivity index (SI) was 83.05±9.68 for FP and 85.35±8.03 for HIP. So, SI improved in the HIP technique by about 2.3% compare to FP. Similarly, average gradient index (GI) for FP and HIP were respectively 2.82±0.23 and 2.76±0.33. And the average beam on time (BT) of FP and HIP were, respectively, 48.15±23.14 min and 48.35±18.09 min. So, all plan indices show improvement in the hybrid inverse planning technique over forward plans. Consequently, this will improve the quality of patient treatment in GammaKnife.

一种提高GammaKnife治疗计划指标的技术:回顾性研究。
本研究旨在寻找Leksell GammaPlan逆规划模块中优先级的最优值,从而为GammaKnife SRS提供更好的治疗计划指标。研究表明,Leksell GammaPlan逆规划模块中权重或优先级的最佳优化设置为:覆盖0.6、梯度指数0.3、光束到达时间0.5。使用此最优优先级设置制定的反向计划(混合反向计划,HIP)与覆盖率均为95%的正向计划(FP)进行比较。结果表明,FP和HIP的平均选择性指数分别为83.05±9.68和85.35±8.03。因此,与FP相比,SI在HIP技术中提高了约2.3%。同样,FP和HIP的平均梯度指数分别为2.82±0.23和2.76±0.33。FP和HIP的平均光束到达时间(BT)分别为48.15±23.14 min和48.35±18.09 min。因此,混合反向规划技术的各项计划指标均优于正向规划。因此,这将提高GammaKnife的患者治疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信