Dosimetric comparison of Gamma Knife® IconTM and linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) plans for the re-irradiation of large (>14 cm3) recurrent glioblastomas.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Matthew E Schelin, Haisong Liu, Ayesha Ali, Wenyin Shi, Yan Yu, Karen E Mooney
{"title":"Dosimetric comparison of Gamma Knife® Icon<sup>TM</sup> and linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) plans for the re-irradiation of large (>14 cm<sup>3</sup>) recurrent glioblastomas.","authors":"Matthew E Schelin,&nbsp;Haisong Liu,&nbsp;Ayesha Ali,&nbsp;Wenyin Shi,&nbsp;Yan Yu,&nbsp;Karen E Mooney","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective is to investigate dosimetric differences between clinically deliverable Gamma Knife<sup>®</sup> (GK) Icon™ and linac-based FSRT plans on the basis of normal brain dose sparing for large (>14 cm<sup>3</sup>) recurrent glioblastomas (GBM). Sixteen patients with large, recurrent GBM were treated using re-irradiation via linac-based FSRT, 35 Gy in 10 fractions. For each patient, a new GK FSRT plan was created in Leksell GammaPlan<sup>®</sup> V11 (LGP). To maintain clinical deliverability, the LGP optimization included a planning goal of treatment time <20 minutes per fraction. Dosimetric comparison of coverage and normal brain dose between the linac and GK treatment plans was performed in MIM. The GK FSRT plans had significantly (p < 0.05) lower mean normal brain dose values (-8.85%), mean values of normal brain V20 (-32.4%) and V12 (-25.9%), and a lower mean V4 (-10.0%). GK FSRT plans have the potential to reduce the risk of radiation-related toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"7 3","pages":"233-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8055238/pdf/rsbrt-7-243.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective is to investigate dosimetric differences between clinically deliverable Gamma Knife® (GK) Icon™ and linac-based FSRT plans on the basis of normal brain dose sparing for large (>14 cm3) recurrent glioblastomas (GBM). Sixteen patients with large, recurrent GBM were treated using re-irradiation via linac-based FSRT, 35 Gy in 10 fractions. For each patient, a new GK FSRT plan was created in Leksell GammaPlan® V11 (LGP). To maintain clinical deliverability, the LGP optimization included a planning goal of treatment time <20 minutes per fraction. Dosimetric comparison of coverage and normal brain dose between the linac and GK treatment plans was performed in MIM. The GK FSRT plans had significantly (p < 0.05) lower mean normal brain dose values (-8.85%), mean values of normal brain V20 (-32.4%) and V12 (-25.9%), and a lower mean V4 (-10.0%). GK FSRT plans have the potential to reduce the risk of radiation-related toxicities.

伽玛刀®IconTM和基于线性加速器的分割立体定向放疗(FSRT)计划对大(>14 cm3)复发性胶质母细胞瘤再照射的剂量学比较
我们的目的是研究临床可交付的伽玛刀(GK) Icon™和基于linac的FSRT计划在正常脑剂量节约的基础上对大(>14 cm3)复发性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的剂量差异。16例复发性大GBM患者采用基于linacs的FSRT再照射治疗,每次35 Gy,分10次。对于每位患者,在Leksell GammaPlan®V11 (LGP)中创建了新的GK FSRT计划。为了保持临床可交付性,LGP优化包括治疗时间的计划目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信