Preliminary study of self-perceived communication competence amongst adults who do and do not stutter

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Danielle Werle, Katherine L. Winters, Courtney T. Byrd
{"title":"Preliminary study of self-perceived communication competence amongst adults who do and do not stutter","authors":"Danielle Werle,&nbsp;Katherine L. Winters,&nbsp;Courtney T. Byrd","doi":"10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Adults who stutter report a significant impact of stuttering on their quality of life, including negative thoughts and attitudes toward communication. In addition to this impact, adolescents who stutter also report lower levels of self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) compared to fluent peers. The purpose of this study was to extend the investigation of SPCC to adults who do and do not stutter. Additional aims investigated included if 1) SPCC predicted overall impact of stuttering, and, 2) stuttering frequency predicted SPCC among adults who stutter.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-four adults who stutter and twenty-seven adults who do not stutter matched for age, gender, and education completed the <em>Self-Perceived Communication Competence Scale</em> (<span>Richmond &amp; McCroskey, 1997</span>). All participants who stutter completed the <em>Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering</em> (<em>OASES</em> [ages 18+]; <span>Yaruss &amp; Quesal, 2006</span>) and speaking samples to measure stuttering frequency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Adults who stutter reported significantly lower <em>SPCC</em> scale total scores than adults who do not stutter. For adults who stutter, lower <em>SPCC</em> scale scores significantly predicted more severe overall impact of stuttering as measured by the <em>OASES.</em> Stuttering frequency did not predict <em>SPCC</em> scale scores.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This is the first study to report differences in self-perceived communication competence between adults who do and do not stutter. Results suggest adults who stutter report lower self-perceived communication competence compared to adults who do not stutter. Adults who perceive themselves to have greater communication competence reported less severe overall impact of stuttering, and stuttering frequency did not influence SPCC. Clinical implications for intervention are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105848","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X21000279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Purpose

Adults who stutter report a significant impact of stuttering on their quality of life, including negative thoughts and attitudes toward communication. In addition to this impact, adolescents who stutter also report lower levels of self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) compared to fluent peers. The purpose of this study was to extend the investigation of SPCC to adults who do and do not stutter. Additional aims investigated included if 1) SPCC predicted overall impact of stuttering, and, 2) stuttering frequency predicted SPCC among adults who stutter.

Methods

Twenty-four adults who stutter and twenty-seven adults who do not stutter matched for age, gender, and education completed the Self-Perceived Communication Competence Scale (Richmond & McCroskey, 1997). All participants who stutter completed the Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering (OASES [ages 18+]; Yaruss & Quesal, 2006) and speaking samples to measure stuttering frequency.

Results

Adults who stutter reported significantly lower SPCC scale total scores than adults who do not stutter. For adults who stutter, lower SPCC scale scores significantly predicted more severe overall impact of stuttering as measured by the OASES. Stuttering frequency did not predict SPCC scale scores.

Discussion

This is the first study to report differences in self-perceived communication competence between adults who do and do not stutter. Results suggest adults who stutter report lower self-perceived communication competence compared to adults who do not stutter. Adults who perceive themselves to have greater communication competence reported less severe overall impact of stuttering, and stuttering frequency did not influence SPCC. Clinical implications for intervention are discussed.

结巴和非结巴成人自我感知沟通能力的初步研究
目的口吃的成年人报告说,口吃对他们的生活质量有重大影响,包括消极的想法和对沟通的态度。除了这种影响之外,与流利的同龄人相比,口吃的青少年自我感知的沟通能力(SPCC)水平也较低。本研究的目的是将SPCC的调查扩展到有口吃和没有口吃的成年人。研究的其他目的包括:1)SPCC预测口吃的总体影响;2)口吃频率预测成人口吃者的SPCC。方法24名口吃成人和27名年龄、性别、教育程度相匹配的非口吃成人完成了自我感知沟通能力量表(Richmond &McCroskey, 1997)。所有口吃的参与者都完成了说话者口吃经历的总体评估(OASES)[年龄在18岁以上];Yaruss,Quesal, 2006)和说话样本来测量口吃频率。结果口吃者的SPCC量表总分明显低于非口吃者。对于口吃的成年人,较低的SPCC量表得分显著预示着更严重的口吃总体影响。口吃频率不能预测SPCC量表得分。这是第一个报告有口吃和没有口吃的成年人之间自我感知的沟通能力差异的研究。结果表明,与不口吃的成年人相比,口吃的成年人自我认知的沟通能力较低。自认为沟通能力较强的成年人报告的口吃总体影响较轻,口吃频率对SPCC没有影响。讨论了干预的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Journal of Fluency Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fluency Disorders provides comprehensive coverage of clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects of stuttering, including the latest remediation techniques. As the official journal of the International Fluency Association, the journal features full-length research and clinical reports; methodological, theoretical and philosophical articles; reviews; short communications and much more – all readily accessible and tailored to the needs of the professional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信