A Structured, Hybrid Cystoscopy Simulation Curriculum for Obstetrics/Gynecology Residents.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Linh Do, Kainat Pasha, Sheralyn Sanchez, T Ignacio Montoya, Pedro A Maldonado
{"title":"A Structured, Hybrid Cystoscopy Simulation Curriculum for Obstetrics/Gynecology Residents.","authors":"Linh Do,&nbsp;Kainat Pasha,&nbsp;Sheralyn Sanchez,&nbsp;T Ignacio Montoya,&nbsp;Pedro A Maldonado","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the subjective and objective cystoscopy skills of gynecology residents before and after implementation of a comprehensive simulation curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residents in an obstetrics/gynecology program at a single academic institution participated in a 6-week cystoscopy simulation course. Residents attended an initial orientation and didactic presentation, and then weekly 20- to 30-minute training sessions using a water balloon model and a virtual reality simulator. Pretesting and posttesting were performed, including (1) subjective self-assessments, (2) a written quiz, and (3) objective structured assessment of technical skills. Paired t test was used to assess the differences in residents' objective assessment scores before and after simulation training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 residents were recruited. Residents reported significant subjective improvements in comfort, confidence, and proficiency in performing cystoscopy after completing the curriculum. Their overall objective assessment improved, including written quiz scores (mean score, 49% vs 78%; P < 0.001), efficiency in cystoscope assembly (means score, 0 vs 4; P < 0.001), overall bladder survey score (56% vs 86%, P < 0.001), and global rating score (mean score, 15 vs 24; P < 0.001). Residents tended to prefer the water-balloon model compared with the virtual reality simulator (75% vs 25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obstetrics/gynecology residents demonstrated significant improvements in subjective and objective measures of skill after completion of a 6-week cystoscopy simulation training course using a combination of low- and high-fidelity models. Although universal cystoscopy at the time of hysterectomy for benign indications remains controversial, cystoscopy simulation should remain an important part of resident training.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 10","pages":"637-641"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the subjective and objective cystoscopy skills of gynecology residents before and after implementation of a comprehensive simulation curriculum.

Methods: Residents in an obstetrics/gynecology program at a single academic institution participated in a 6-week cystoscopy simulation course. Residents attended an initial orientation and didactic presentation, and then weekly 20- to 30-minute training sessions using a water balloon model and a virtual reality simulator. Pretesting and posttesting were performed, including (1) subjective self-assessments, (2) a written quiz, and (3) objective structured assessment of technical skills. Paired t test was used to assess the differences in residents' objective assessment scores before and after simulation training.

Results: A total of 16 residents were recruited. Residents reported significant subjective improvements in comfort, confidence, and proficiency in performing cystoscopy after completing the curriculum. Their overall objective assessment improved, including written quiz scores (mean score, 49% vs 78%; P < 0.001), efficiency in cystoscope assembly (means score, 0 vs 4; P < 0.001), overall bladder survey score (56% vs 86%, P < 0.001), and global rating score (mean score, 15 vs 24; P < 0.001). Residents tended to prefer the water-balloon model compared with the virtual reality simulator (75% vs 25%).

Conclusions: Obstetrics/gynecology residents demonstrated significant improvements in subjective and objective measures of skill after completion of a 6-week cystoscopy simulation training course using a combination of low- and high-fidelity models. Although universal cystoscopy at the time of hysterectomy for benign indications remains controversial, cystoscopy simulation should remain an important part of resident training.

产科/妇科住院医师的结构化混合膀胱镜模拟课程。
目的:本研究旨在评估妇科住院医师在实施综合模拟课程前后的主客观膀胱镜检查技能。方法:某学术机构妇产科住院医师参加为期6周的膀胱镜模拟课程。居民们参加了最初的指导和教学演示,然后每周使用水球模型和虚拟现实模拟器进行20到30分钟的培训。进行了前测和后测,包括(1)主观自我评估,(2)书面测验和(3)客观结构化的技术技能评估。采用配对t检验评估模拟训练前后住院医师客观评价得分的差异。结果:共招募16名住院医师。住院医师报告在完成课程后,在进行膀胱镜检查的舒适度、信心和熟练程度上有显著的主观改善。他们的整体客观评估有所提高,包括书面测验分数(平均分数49% vs 78%;P < 0.001),膀胱镜装配效率(平均得分0 vs 4;P < 0.001)、膀胱总体调查评分(56% vs 86%, P < 0.001)和总体评分(平均评分,15 vs 24;P < 0.001)。与虚拟现实模拟器相比,居民更喜欢水球模型(75% vs 25%)。结论:妇产科住院医师在完成为期6周的结合高保真度和低保真度模型的膀胱镜模拟训练课程后,其主观和客观技能指标均有显著改善。尽管在良性子宫切除术时普遍进行膀胱镜检查仍存在争议,但膀胱镜模拟仍应是住院医师培训的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信