Look to the future but remember the past: A commentary on Ocklenburg, Berretz, Packheiser, and Friedrich (2020).

IF 0.9 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Laterality Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-06 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2020.1866595

Daniel Voyer

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This is a commentary on a paper by Ocklenburg et al. ([2020]. Laterality 2020: entering the next decade. Laterality). I discuss measurement and task selection issues that should not be neglected as we make our way through the next decade. I also comment further on a few pointed issues relevant to open science and meta-analysis.

查看原文本刊更多论文

展望未来，但不要忘记过去:对Ocklenburg, Berretz, Packheiser和Friedrich(2020)的评论。

本文是对Ocklenburg等人([2020])的一篇论文的评论。横向2020:进入下一个十年。一侧)。我讨论了在我们走过下一个十年的道路时不应该忽视的度量和任务选择问题。我还进一步评论了一些与开放科学和元分析相关的尖锐问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Laterality Multiple-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.