Development and validation of the Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Skills Scale among college students.

IF 11.4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Evidence Based Mental Health Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-05 DOI:10.1136/ebmental-2020-300217
Masatsugu Sakata, Rie Toyomoto, Kazufumi Yoshida, Yan Luo, Yukako Nakagami, Shuntaro Aoki, Tomonari Irie, Yuji Sakano, Hidemichi Suga, Michihisa Sumi, Takashi Muto, Nao Shiraishi, Ethan Sahker, Teruhisa Uwatoko, Toshi A Furukawa
{"title":"Development and validation of the Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Skills Scale among college students.","authors":"Masatsugu Sakata,&nbsp;Rie Toyomoto,&nbsp;Kazufumi Yoshida,&nbsp;Yan Luo,&nbsp;Yukako Nakagami,&nbsp;Shuntaro Aoki,&nbsp;Tomonari Irie,&nbsp;Yuji Sakano,&nbsp;Hidemichi Suga,&nbsp;Michihisa Sumi,&nbsp;Takashi Muto,&nbsp;Nao Shiraishi,&nbsp;Ethan Sahker,&nbsp;Teruhisa Uwatoko,&nbsp;Toshi A Furukawa","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are many different skill components used in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). However, there is currently no comprehensive way of measuring these skills in patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a comprehensive and brief measure of five main CBT skills: self-monitoring, behavioural activation, cognitive restructuring, assertiveness training and problem-solving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>University students (N=847) who participated in a fully factorial randomised controlled trial of smartphone CBT were assessed with the CBT Skills Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the short form of the Japanese Big Five Scale. Structural validity was estimated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency evaluated with Cronbach's α coefficients. Construct validity was evaluated with the correlations between each factor of the CBT Skills Scale, the PHQ-9, the GAD-7 and the Big Five Scale.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The EFA supported a five-factor solution based on the original instruments assessing each CBT skill component. The CFA showed sufficient goodness-of-fit indices for the five-factor structure. The Cronbach's α of each factor was 0.75-0.81. Each CBT skills factor was specifically correlated to the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and the Big Five Scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CBT Skills Scale has a stable structural validity and internal consistency with a five-factor solution and appropriate content validity concerning the relationship with depression, anxiety and personality.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The CBT Skills Scale will be potential predictor and effect modifier in studying the optimisation of CBT interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTR-000031307.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300217","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: There are many different skill components used in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). However, there is currently no comprehensive way of measuring these skills in patients.

Objective: To develop a comprehensive and brief measure of five main CBT skills: self-monitoring, behavioural activation, cognitive restructuring, assertiveness training and problem-solving.

Methods: University students (N=847) who participated in a fully factorial randomised controlled trial of smartphone CBT were assessed with the CBT Skills Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the short form of the Japanese Big Five Scale. Structural validity was estimated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency evaluated with Cronbach's α coefficients. Construct validity was evaluated with the correlations between each factor of the CBT Skills Scale, the PHQ-9, the GAD-7 and the Big Five Scale.

Findings: The EFA supported a five-factor solution based on the original instruments assessing each CBT skill component. The CFA showed sufficient goodness-of-fit indices for the five-factor structure. The Cronbach's α of each factor was 0.75-0.81. Each CBT skills factor was specifically correlated to the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and the Big Five Scale.

Conclusions: The CBT Skills Scale has a stable structural validity and internal consistency with a five-factor solution and appropriate content validity concerning the relationship with depression, anxiety and personality.

Clinical implications: The CBT Skills Scale will be potential predictor and effect modifier in studying the optimisation of CBT interventions.

Trial registration: CTR-000031307.

Abstract Image

大学生认知行为治疗技能量表的编制与验证。
背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)中使用了许多不同的技能组成部分。然而,目前还没有全面的方法来衡量患者的这些技能。目的:开发一个全面和简短的测量五种主要CBT技能:自我监控,行为激活,认知重构,自信训练和解决问题。方法:采用CBT技能量表、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 (GAD-7)和日本大五量表简写形式对847名大学生进行智能手机CBT全因子随机对照试验。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度,采用Cronbach’s α系数评估内部一致性。采用CBT技能量表、PHQ-9、GAD-7和大五量表各因子的相关性来评价构念效度。结果:EFA支持基于原始工具评估每个CBT技能组成的五因素解决方案。CFA对五因子结构显示了足够的拟合优度指标。各因子的Cronbach’s α为0.75 ~ 0.81。每个CBT技能因素都与PHQ-9, GAD-7和大五量表相关。结论:CBT技能量表与抑郁、焦虑、人格的关系具有稳定的结构效度和内部一致性,具有五因子解和适当的内容效度。临床意义:CBT技能量表将是研究CBT干预优化的潜在预测因子和效果调节剂。试验注册:tr -000031307。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信