Jennifer Creaser, Peter Ashwin, Claire Postlethwaite, Juliane Britz
{"title":"Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates.","authors":"Jennifer Creaser, Peter Ashwin, Claire Postlethwaite, Juliane Britz","doi":"10.1186/s13408-020-00100-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The brain is intrinsically organized into large-scale networks that constantly re-organize on multiple timescales, even when the brain is at rest. The timing of these dynamics is crucial for sensation, perception, cognition, and ultimately consciousness, but the underlying dynamics governing the constant reorganization and switching between networks are not yet well understood. Electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates are brief periods of stable scalp topography that have been identified as the electrophysiological correlate of functional magnetic resonance imaging defined resting-state networks. Spatiotemporal microstate sequences maintain high temporal resolution and have been shown to be scale-free with long-range temporal correlations. Previous attempts to model EEG microstate sequences have failed to capture this crucial property and so cannot fully capture the dynamics; this paper answers the call for more sophisticated modeling approaches. We present a dynamical model that exhibits a noisy network attractor between nodes that represent the microstates. Using an excitable network between four nodes, we can reproduce the transition probabilities between microstates but not the heavy tailed residence time distributions. We present two extensions to this model: first, an additional hidden node at each state; second, an additional layer that controls the switching frequency in the original network. Introducing either extension to the network gives the flexibility to capture these heavy tails. We compare the model generated sequences to microstate sequences from EEG data collected from healthy subjects at rest. For the first extension, we show that the hidden nodes 'trap' the trajectories allowing the control of residence times at each node. For the second extension, we show that two nodes in the controlling layer are sufficient to model the long residence times. Finally, we show that in addition to capturing the residence time distributions and transition probabilities of the sequences, these two models capture additional properties of the sequences including having interspersed long and short residence times and long range temporal correlations in line with the data as measured by the Hurst exponent.</p>","PeriodicalId":54271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience","volume":"11 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13408-020-00100-0","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-020-00100-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
The brain is intrinsically organized into large-scale networks that constantly re-organize on multiple timescales, even when the brain is at rest. The timing of these dynamics is crucial for sensation, perception, cognition, and ultimately consciousness, but the underlying dynamics governing the constant reorganization and switching between networks are not yet well understood. Electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates are brief periods of stable scalp topography that have been identified as the electrophysiological correlate of functional magnetic resonance imaging defined resting-state networks. Spatiotemporal microstate sequences maintain high temporal resolution and have been shown to be scale-free with long-range temporal correlations. Previous attempts to model EEG microstate sequences have failed to capture this crucial property and so cannot fully capture the dynamics; this paper answers the call for more sophisticated modeling approaches. We present a dynamical model that exhibits a noisy network attractor between nodes that represent the microstates. Using an excitable network between four nodes, we can reproduce the transition probabilities between microstates but not the heavy tailed residence time distributions. We present two extensions to this model: first, an additional hidden node at each state; second, an additional layer that controls the switching frequency in the original network. Introducing either extension to the network gives the flexibility to capture these heavy tails. We compare the model generated sequences to microstate sequences from EEG data collected from healthy subjects at rest. For the first extension, we show that the hidden nodes 'trap' the trajectories allowing the control of residence times at each node. For the second extension, we show that two nodes in the controlling layer are sufficient to model the long residence times. Finally, we show that in addition to capturing the residence time distributions and transition probabilities of the sequences, these two models capture additional properties of the sequences including having interspersed long and short residence times and long range temporal correlations in line with the data as measured by the Hurst exponent.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience (JMN) publishes research articles on the mathematical modeling and analysis of all areas of neuroscience, i.e., the study of the nervous system and its dysfunctions. The focus is on using mathematics as the primary tool for elucidating the fundamental mechanisms responsible for experimentally observed behaviours in neuroscience at all relevant scales, from the molecular world to that of cognition. The aim is to publish work that uses advanced mathematical techniques to illuminate these questions.
It publishes full length original papers, rapid communications and review articles. Papers that combine theoretical results supported by convincing numerical experiments are especially encouraged.
Papers that introduce and help develop those new pieces of mathematical theory which are likely to be relevant to future studies of the nervous system in general and the human brain in particular are also welcome.