Optimal double-spin method for maximizing the concentration of platelets in equine platelet-rich plasma.

Q3 Veterinary
Journal of Equine Science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-18 DOI:10.1294/jes.31.105
Kentaro Fukuda, Atsutoshi Kuwano, Taisuke Kuroda, Norihisa Tamura, Hiroshi Mita, Yuji Okada, Yoshinori Kasashima
{"title":"Optimal double-spin method for maximizing the concentration of platelets in equine platelet-rich plasma.","authors":"Kentaro Fukuda,&nbsp;Atsutoshi Kuwano,&nbsp;Taisuke Kuroda,&nbsp;Norihisa Tamura,&nbsp;Hiroshi Mita,&nbsp;Yuji Okada,&nbsp;Yoshinori Kasashima","doi":"10.1294/jes.31.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study optimized the double-spin conditions for preparing equine platelet-rich plasma (PRP): leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (P-PRP). Whole blood samples were centrifuged at various double-spin conditions. Both L-PRP and P-PRP were prepared at each stage, and complete blood counts and growth factor concentrations were compared. Samples centrifuged at 160 × 900 g, 160 × 2,000 g, and 400 × 2,000 g exhibited the highest platelet counts. P-PRP had significantly lower leukocyte and erythrocyte contents than L-PRP, especially at 400 × 2,000 g. No significant differences were observed in growth factor concentrations. Our data suggest that optimum L-PRP preparation should include centrifugation under the aforementioned conditions, whereas centrifugation at 400 × 2,000 g is optimal for P-PRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":35701,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/8c/jes-31-105.PMC7750641.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.31.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study optimized the double-spin conditions for preparing equine platelet-rich plasma (PRP): leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (P-PRP). Whole blood samples were centrifuged at various double-spin conditions. Both L-PRP and P-PRP were prepared at each stage, and complete blood counts and growth factor concentrations were compared. Samples centrifuged at 160 × 900 g, 160 × 2,000 g, and 400 × 2,000 g exhibited the highest platelet counts. P-PRP had significantly lower leukocyte and erythrocyte contents than L-PRP, especially at 400 × 2,000 g. No significant differences were observed in growth factor concentrations. Our data suggest that optimum L-PRP preparation should include centrifugation under the aforementioned conditions, whereas centrifugation at 400 × 2,000 g is optimal for P-PRP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

马富血小板血浆中血小板浓度最大化的最佳双旋法。
本研究优化了制备马富血小板血浆(PRP)的双旋条件:富白细胞PRP (L-PRP)和贫白细胞PRP (P-PRP)。全血样本在不同的双旋条件下离心。各阶段均制备L-PRP和P-PRP,比较全血细胞计数和生长因子浓度。在160 × 900 g、160 × 2000 g和400 × 2000 g下离心的样品血小板计数最高。P-PRP的白细胞和红细胞含量显著低于L-PRP,特别是在400 × 2000 g时。生长因子浓度无显著差异。我们的数据表明,最佳的L-PRP制备应包括在上述条件下的离心,而在400 × 2000 g的离心是最佳的P-PRP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Science
Journal of Equine Science Veterinary-Equine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信