[Map of ethics conflicts in chronic patient's hospitalization].

IF 0.3 Q4 ETHICS
Francisco Camacho, Francisco López-Soriano, Ricardo Martínez
{"title":"[Map of ethics conflicts in chronic patient's hospitalization].","authors":"Francisco Camacho,&nbsp;Francisco López-Soriano,&nbsp;Ricardo Martínez","doi":"10.30444/CB.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification, priorization and anticipation of the ethics conflicts, allow the Healthcare Ethics Committees (HEC) a better approach to them, as well as the adoption of measures to prevent its appearance and/or its mitigation. For this purpose, we set ourselves the objective of knowing what they are in the present, how important they are, and what would be the future scenario to face. An qualitative structure research was made whit two focal groups whit the participation of nurses, nurse auxiliary and doctors from the hospitalization area, they also answer a future ethics conflicts Decalogue. The results were tested after by their importance level (Relevance-Frequency-Consistency). The medium age of the participants was 34,7 +- 15,4, whit a medium experience at work of 11,7 +- 15,4 years. A total of 40 ethics conflicts was identify grouped in 5 risk areas: professional, assistance, social, organizational and legal. From there 21 results the more important, between them we find patient abandonment, inexistence of internal performance protocols, patient and relatives false expectations waiting for non-assistance care, unnecessary care at the end of the life, lack of rules for family / caregivers, and ignorance of legality. The more important ethical dilemmas for the future identified by the personal will be patients in abandonment, the lack of sociohealth resources, conflicts with family / caregivers situation and lack of information for decision making at the end of the life. The ethical conflicts between the personal from a chronic patients hospital and the relatives/caregivers was identifying, the most important were prioritized, and futures were anticipated. In these scenarios, we highlight abandonment as the most important. A map of ethics conflicts is a good tool to identify risk areas for ethics conflicts, we see the difference between the ethics conflicts found in other kind of hospitals. The map of ethics conflicts need to be update periodically to keep the validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The identification, priorization and anticipation of the ethics conflicts, allow the Healthcare Ethics Committees (HEC) a better approach to them, as well as the adoption of measures to prevent its appearance and/or its mitigation. For this purpose, we set ourselves the objective of knowing what they are in the present, how important they are, and what would be the future scenario to face. An qualitative structure research was made whit two focal groups whit the participation of nurses, nurse auxiliary and doctors from the hospitalization area, they also answer a future ethics conflicts Decalogue. The results were tested after by their importance level (Relevance-Frequency-Consistency). The medium age of the participants was 34,7 +- 15,4, whit a medium experience at work of 11,7 +- 15,4 years. A total of 40 ethics conflicts was identify grouped in 5 risk areas: professional, assistance, social, organizational and legal. From there 21 results the more important, between them we find patient abandonment, inexistence of internal performance protocols, patient and relatives false expectations waiting for non-assistance care, unnecessary care at the end of the life, lack of rules for family / caregivers, and ignorance of legality. The more important ethical dilemmas for the future identified by the personal will be patients in abandonment, the lack of sociohealth resources, conflicts with family / caregivers situation and lack of information for decision making at the end of the life. The ethical conflicts between the personal from a chronic patients hospital and the relatives/caregivers was identifying, the most important were prioritized, and futures were anticipated. In these scenarios, we highlight abandonment as the most important. A map of ethics conflicts is a good tool to identify risk areas for ethics conflicts, we see the difference between the ethics conflicts found in other kind of hospitals. The map of ethics conflicts need to be update periodically to keep the validity.

慢性病人住院治疗中的伦理冲突地图
对伦理冲突的识别、优先排序和预测,使医疗伦理委员会(HEC)能够更好地处理这些冲突,并采取措施防止冲突的出现和/或缓解冲突。为此,我们为自己设定了一个目标,即了解它们目前的情况、它们的重要性以及未来要面对的情况。本研究采用两个焦点小组进行质性结构研究,分别由住院区护士、护士助理和医生参与,并回答未来伦理冲突十戒。然后对结果进行重要性水平(相关性-频率-一致性)测试。被试年龄中位数为34,7 +- 15,4岁,工作经验中位数为11,7 +- 15,4年。共确定了40个道德冲突,分为5个风险领域:专业、援助、社会、组织和法律。从这21个更重要的结果中,我们发现患者被遗弃,内部表现协议的不存在,患者和亲属等待非辅助护理的错误期望,生命结束时不必要的护理,缺乏对家庭/照顾者的规则,以及对法律的无知。个人认为未来更重要的伦理困境将是被遗弃的病人、缺乏社会卫生资源、与家人/照顾者的冲突以及在生命结束时缺乏决策信息。识别慢性病患者与家属/照顾者之间的伦理冲突,优先考虑最重要的冲突,并对未来进行预测。在这些情况下,我们强调放弃是最重要的。伦理冲突地图是识别伦理冲突风险区域的一个很好的工具,我们看到了其他类型医院的伦理冲突之间的差异。伦理冲突地图需要定期更新以保持其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: La revista Cuadernos de Bioética, órgano oficial de la Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica, publica cuatrimestralmente artículos y recensiones bibliográficas sobre todas las áreas de la bioética: fundamentación, ética de la investigación, bioética clínica, biojurídica, etc. Estos proceden de los aceptados en la revisión tutelada por los editores de la revista como de otros que por encargo el comité editorial solicite a sus autores. La edicion de la revista se financia con las aportaciones de los socios de AEBI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信