An Umbrella Review of Text Message Programs for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions
Robin Whittemore, Lauren Siverly, Dora Lendvai Wischik, Christina R Whitehouse
{"title":"An Umbrella Review of Text Message Programs for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Robin Whittemore,&nbsp;Lauren Siverly,&nbsp;Dora Lendvai Wischik,&nbsp;Christina R Whitehouse","doi":"10.1177/0145721720965464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize the evidence from published systematic reviews on the effectiveness of text message programs for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on glycemic management (A1C), self-management, and other clinical outcomes. The effect of directionality of the program was also explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases. Inclusion criteria were systematic review of text message programs for adults with T2DM, evaluated A1C, and English language. Quality assessment was completed using AMSTAR-2 guidelines. Data were extracted by multiple coders, and results were synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 9 systematic reviews published between 2011 and 2019, with 72 unique international studies. Text message programs focused on diabetes self-management and reducing health risks through educational and motivational content with some providing personalized feedback. A meta-analysis of program effect on A1C was conducted in 5 reviews with a pooled difference in A1C from -0.38% to -0.8%. Adults with T2DM of shorter duration and lower A1C had better treatment effects. Evidence on unidirectional versus bidirectional programs is conflicting; however, both improve outcomes. Evidence of text message programs targeting medication engagement was inconclusive. Some programs improved blood pressure, lipids, self-management, self-efficacy, and health behaviors. High satisfaction and an average of 9.6% to 18.7% attrition was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Text messaging programs can improve T2DM outcomes, are a highly accessible mode of communication, are relatively inexpensive, and are an underutilized adjunct to clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721720965464","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720965464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize the evidence from published systematic reviews on the effectiveness of text message programs for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on glycemic management (A1C), self-management, and other clinical outcomes. The effect of directionality of the program was also explored.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases. Inclusion criteria were systematic review of text message programs for adults with T2DM, evaluated A1C, and English language. Quality assessment was completed using AMSTAR-2 guidelines. Data were extracted by multiple coders, and results were synthesized.

Results: The final sample included 9 systematic reviews published between 2011 and 2019, with 72 unique international studies. Text message programs focused on diabetes self-management and reducing health risks through educational and motivational content with some providing personalized feedback. A meta-analysis of program effect on A1C was conducted in 5 reviews with a pooled difference in A1C from -0.38% to -0.8%. Adults with T2DM of shorter duration and lower A1C had better treatment effects. Evidence on unidirectional versus bidirectional programs is conflicting; however, both improve outcomes. Evidence of text message programs targeting medication engagement was inconclusive. Some programs improved blood pressure, lipids, self-management, self-efficacy, and health behaviors. High satisfaction and an average of 9.6% to 18.7% attrition was reported.

Conclusions: Text messaging programs can improve T2DM outcomes, are a highly accessible mode of communication, are relatively inexpensive, and are an underutilized adjunct to clinical care.

对成人2型糖尿病患者短信项目的综述。
目的:本综述的目的是综合已发表的关于2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者短信程序在血糖控制(A1C)、自我管理和其他临床结果方面有效性的系统综述的证据。探讨了程序的方向性的影响。方法:利用多个数据库进行系统检索。纳入标准是对T2DM成人短信项目进行系统评价,评估A1C和英语水平。使用AMSTAR-2指南完成质量评估。通过多个编码器提取数据,并对结果进行综合。结果:最终样本包括2011年至2019年间发表的9篇系统综述,其中包括72项独特的国际研究。通过教育和激励内容以及一些提供个性化反馈的短信程序,重点关注糖尿病的自我管理和降低健康风险。对5篇综述进行了A1C影响的荟萃分析,A1C的总差异从-0.38%到-0.8%。病程短、糖化血红蛋白较低的成人T2DM患者治疗效果较好。单向和双向程序的证据是相互矛盾的;然而,两者都能改善结果。针对服药的短信程序的证据尚无定论。一些项目改善了血压、血脂、自我管理、自我效能和健康行为。满意度高,平均流失率为9.6%至18.7%。结论:短信程序可以改善2型糖尿病的预后,是一种高度可及的交流方式,相对便宜,是一种未充分利用的临床护理辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Educator
Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Di­abetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary pro­fession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信