Ethical challenges in research on post-abortion care with adolescents: experiences of researchers in Zambia.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Joseph M Zulu, Joseph Ali, Kristina Hallez, Nancy E Kass, Charles Michelo, Adnan A Hyder
{"title":"Ethical challenges in research on post-abortion care with adolescents: experiences of researchers in Zambia.","authors":"Joseph M Zulu, Joseph Ali, Kristina Hallez, Nancy E Kass, Charles Michelo, Adnan A Hyder","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2018.1528657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-abortion care (PAC) research is increasingly being conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to help reduce the high burden of unsafe abortion. This study aims to help address the evidence gap about ethical challenges that researchers in LMICs face when carrying out PAC research with adolescents. Employing an explorative qualitative approach, the study identified several ethics challenges encountered by PAC researchers in Zambia, including those associated with seeking ethics and regulatory approvals at institutional and national levels. Persistent stigma around abortion and community perceptions that PAC studies encourage adolescents to seek abortion affected adolescents' right to exercise their autonomy and to make decisions as well as exposed adolescents to social stigmatization risks. Challenges with recruitment was reported to result in abandoning of studies, thereby undermining development of PAC services that are more responsive to adolescent needs. Training needs identified included knowledge of best practices for conducting and disseminating PAC research. Strategies for addressing the ethical challenges included trust building and using less value-laden terminology when seeking permission and consent. It is essential to the future of PAC research in Zambia and globally that these important challenges be addressed through the development of comprehensive ethics guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"104-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7733980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2018.1528657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-abortion care (PAC) research is increasingly being conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to help reduce the high burden of unsafe abortion. This study aims to help address the evidence gap about ethical challenges that researchers in LMICs face when carrying out PAC research with adolescents. Employing an explorative qualitative approach, the study identified several ethics challenges encountered by PAC researchers in Zambia, including those associated with seeking ethics and regulatory approvals at institutional and national levels. Persistent stigma around abortion and community perceptions that PAC studies encourage adolescents to seek abortion affected adolescents' right to exercise their autonomy and to make decisions as well as exposed adolescents to social stigmatization risks. Challenges with recruitment was reported to result in abandoning of studies, thereby undermining development of PAC services that are more responsive to adolescent needs. Training needs identified included knowledge of best practices for conducting and disseminating PAC research. Strategies for addressing the ethical challenges included trust building and using less value-laden terminology when seeking permission and consent. It is essential to the future of PAC research in Zambia and globally that these important challenges be addressed through the development of comprehensive ethics guidance.

青少年堕胎后护理研究中的伦理挑战:赞比亚研究人员的经验。
中低收入国家(LMICs)越来越多地开展堕胎后护理(PAC)研究,以帮助减轻不安全堕胎造成的沉重负担。本研究旨在帮助解决低收入和中等收入国家的研究人员在对青少年进行 PAC 研究时所面临的伦理挑战方面的证据缺口。本研究采用探索性定性方法,确定了赞比亚 PAC 研究人员在伦理方面遇到的若干挑战,包括在机构和国家层面寻求伦理和监管审批的相关挑战。围绕堕胎的污名化现象持续存在,社区认为 PAC 研究鼓励青少年寻求堕胎,这影响了青少年行使自主权和做出决定的权利,并使青少年面临社会污名化的风险。据报告,招募方面的挑战导致了研究的放弃,从而影响了更能满足青少年需求的 PAC 服务的发展。已确定的培训需求包括了解开展和传播 PAC 研究的最佳做法。应对伦理挑战的策略包括建立信任以及在征求许可和同意时使用价值色彩较淡的术语。通过制定全面的伦理指导来应对这些重要挑战,对于赞比亚乃至全球的 PAC 研究的未来都至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信