Distance to an Abortion Provider and Its Association with the Abortion Rate: A Multistate Longitudinal Analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-17 DOI:10.1363/psrh.12164
Benjamin P Brown, Luciana E Hebert, Melissa Gilliam, Robert Kaestner
{"title":"Distance to an Abortion Provider and Its Association with the Abortion Rate: A Multistate Longitudinal Analysis.","authors":"Benjamin P Brown,&nbsp;Luciana E Hebert,&nbsp;Melissa Gilliam,&nbsp;Robert Kaestner","doi":"10.1363/psrh.12164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although one in four U.S. women has an abortion in her lifetime, barriers to abortion persist, including distance to care. This study evaluates the association between distance to care and the abortion rate, adjusting for abortion demand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two analyses were conducted using a data set linking provider locations and 2000-2014 county-level abortion data for 18 states; data sources included the Census Bureau, state vital statistics offices and the Guttmacher Institute. First, a series of linear regression models were run, with and without adjustment for demographic covariates, modeling distance as both a continuous and a categorical variable. Then, an instrumental variable analysis was conducted in which being 30 or more miles from a large college-enrolled female population younger than age 25 was used as an instrument for distance to a provider. The outcome variable for all models was abortions per 1,000 women aged 25 or older. All models were adjusted for state, year and state-year interaction fixed effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased distance to a provider was associated with a decreased abortion rate. Each additional mile to a provider was associated with a decrease of 0.011 in the abortion rate. Compared with being within 30 miles of a provider, being between 30 and 90 miles from a provider was associated with 0.80-1.46 fewer abortions per 1,000 women. In the instrumental variable analysis, being 30 or more miles from a provider was associated with 5.26 fewer abortions per 1,000 women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distance to a provider may present a barrier to abortion by preventing access to care. Therefore, policies that increase travel distances have potential for harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Context: Although one in four U.S. women has an abortion in her lifetime, barriers to abortion persist, including distance to care. This study evaluates the association between distance to care and the abortion rate, adjusting for abortion demand.

Methods: Two analyses were conducted using a data set linking provider locations and 2000-2014 county-level abortion data for 18 states; data sources included the Census Bureau, state vital statistics offices and the Guttmacher Institute. First, a series of linear regression models were run, with and without adjustment for demographic covariates, modeling distance as both a continuous and a categorical variable. Then, an instrumental variable analysis was conducted in which being 30 or more miles from a large college-enrolled female population younger than age 25 was used as an instrument for distance to a provider. The outcome variable for all models was abortions per 1,000 women aged 25 or older. All models were adjusted for state, year and state-year interaction fixed effects.

Results: Increased distance to a provider was associated with a decreased abortion rate. Each additional mile to a provider was associated with a decrease of 0.011 in the abortion rate. Compared with being within 30 miles of a provider, being between 30 and 90 miles from a provider was associated with 0.80-1.46 fewer abortions per 1,000 women. In the instrumental variable analysis, being 30 or more miles from a provider was associated with 5.26 fewer abortions per 1,000 women.

Conclusions: Distance to a provider may present a barrier to abortion by preventing access to care. Therefore, policies that increase travel distances have potential for harm.

与流产提供者的距离及其与流产率的关系:一项多州纵向分析。
背景:尽管四分之一的美国妇女一生中有过堕胎经历,但堕胎的障碍仍然存在,包括与护理的距离。本研究评估护理距离与流产率之间的关系,并调整流产需求。方法:使用连接提供者地点和18个州2000-2014年县级堕胎数据的数据集进行两次分析;数据来源包括人口普查局、州人口统计办公室和古特马赫研究所。首先,运行一系列线性回归模型,在调整和不调整人口统计协变量的情况下,将距离建模为连续变量和分类变量。然后,进行了一项工具变量分析,其中距离25岁以下的大量大学入学女性人群30英里或以上作为与提供者距离的工具。所有模型的结果变量是每1000名25岁或以上妇女的堕胎率。所有模型都针对州、年度和州-年度交互固定效应进行了调整。结果:与提供者的距离增加与流产率降低有关。每多走一英里,堕胎率就会降低0.011。与距离医疗服务提供者30英里以内的妇女相比,距离医疗服务提供者30至90英里的妇女每1000人中堕胎率减少0.80-1.46。在工具变量分析中,距离医疗服务提供者30英里或更远的地方,每1000名妇女的堕胎率减少5.26例。结论:与提供者的距离可能通过阻止获得护理而成为流产的障碍。因此,增加出行距离的政策有潜在的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信