Effect of Task-Specific Training on Trunk Control and Balance in Patients with Subacute Stroke.

IF 1.7 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neurology Research International Pub Date : 2020-11-17 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/5090193
Mohamed E Khallaf
{"title":"Effect of Task-Specific Training on Trunk Control and Balance in Patients with Subacute Stroke.","authors":"Mohamed E Khallaf","doi":"10.1155/2020/5090193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Impairment of static and dynamic posture control is common after stroke. It is found to be a predictor and an essential component for balance, walking ability, and activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes. Studies investigating effect of physical therapy techniques with an aim to improve trunk function after stroke are limited. This study aimed at studying the effect of task-specific training on trunk control and balance in patients with subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trail, thirty-four patients were alienated into two equal groups. The study group (<i>n</i> = 17) received task-specific training, and the control group (<i>n</i> = 17) received conventional physical therapy based on the neurodevelopmental technique. Task-specific training was applied through two phases with criteria of progression based on Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment postural control stages. The interventions were applied in a dosage of 60 min per session, three times a week for ten weeks. Static and dynamic balance were measured by the trunk impairment scale (TIS), postural assessment scale (PAS), and functional reach test (FRT). Laser-guided digital goniometer was used to measure the trunk ranges of motions (ROM) as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences between the baseline and the follow-up measures including TIS, PAS, FRT, and trunk (ROM) were found in both groups (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). In-between group comparison also showed significant differences between the results of both groups indicating more improvements among patients representing the study group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Task-specific training may be effective in improving the static and dynamic postural control and trunk ranges of motion among subacute stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19124,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5090193","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5090193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objectives: Impairment of static and dynamic posture control is common after stroke. It is found to be a predictor and an essential component for balance, walking ability, and activities of daily living (ADL) outcomes. Studies investigating effect of physical therapy techniques with an aim to improve trunk function after stroke are limited. This study aimed at studying the effect of task-specific training on trunk control and balance in patients with subacute stroke.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trail, thirty-four patients were alienated into two equal groups. The study group (n = 17) received task-specific training, and the control group (n = 17) received conventional physical therapy based on the neurodevelopmental technique. Task-specific training was applied through two phases with criteria of progression based on Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment postural control stages. The interventions were applied in a dosage of 60 min per session, three times a week for ten weeks. Static and dynamic balance were measured by the trunk impairment scale (TIS), postural assessment scale (PAS), and functional reach test (FRT). Laser-guided digital goniometer was used to measure the trunk ranges of motions (ROM) as a secondary outcome.

Results: Significant differences between the baseline and the follow-up measures including TIS, PAS, FRT, and trunk (ROM) were found in both groups (P ≤ 0.05). In-between group comparison also showed significant differences between the results of both groups indicating more improvements among patients representing the study group.

Conclusion: Task-specific training may be effective in improving the static and dynamic postural control and trunk ranges of motion among subacute stroke patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

特定任务训练对亚急性脑卒中患者躯干控制和平衡的影响。
目的:卒中后的静态和动态姿势控制障碍是常见的。研究发现,它是平衡、行走能力和日常生活活动(ADL)结果的预测因子和重要组成部分。以改善脑卒中后躯干功能为目的的物理治疗技术的研究非常有限。本研究旨在研究特定任务训练对亚急性脑卒中患者躯干控制和平衡的影响。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,34例患者被分为两组。研究组(n = 17)接受特定任务训练,对照组(n = 17)接受基于神经发育技术的常规物理治疗。任务特异性训练分为两个阶段,根据Chedoke-McMaster卒中评估姿势控制阶段的进展标准进行。干预措施以每次60分钟的剂量应用,每周三次,持续10周。采用躯干损伤量表(TIS)、体位评估量表(PAS)和功能伸展测试(FRT)测量静态和动态平衡。激光制导数字测角仪用于测量躯干运动范围(ROM)作为次要结果。结果:两组患者TIS、PAS、FRT、trunk (ROM)指标基线与随访比较差异均有统计学意义(P≤0.05)。组间比较也显示两组结果之间存在显著差异,表明代表研究组的患者有更多改善。结论:特定任务训练可有效改善亚急性脑卒中患者的静态和动态姿势控制及躯干活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on diseases of the nervous system, as well as normal neurological functioning. The journal will consider basic, translational, and clinical research, including animal models and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信