Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in South Africa.

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2020-10-19 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/2412396
Phelisa Sogayise, Udeme Ekrikpo, Ayanda Gcelu, Bianca Davidson, Nicola Wearne, Ugochi Okpechi-Samuel, Theophilus Ifeanyichukwu Umeizudike, Innocent Ijezie Chukwuonye, Ikechi Okpechi
{"title":"Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in South Africa.","authors":"Phelisa Sogayise,&nbsp;Udeme Ekrikpo,&nbsp;Ayanda Gcelu,&nbsp;Bianca Davidson,&nbsp;Nicola Wearne,&nbsp;Ugochi Okpechi-Samuel,&nbsp;Theophilus Ifeanyichukwu Umeizudike,&nbsp;Innocent Ijezie Chukwuonye,&nbsp;Ikechi Okpechi","doi":"10.1155/2020/2412396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lupus nephritis (LN) can be complicated with requirement for kidney replacement therapy and death. Efficacy of induction therapies using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) has been reported from studies, but there is limited data in Africans comparing both treatments in patients with proliferative LN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN diagnosed and treated with either MMF or IVCYC in a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa, over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was attaining complete remission after completion of induction therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 84 patients included, mean age was 29.6 ± 10.4 years and there was a female preponderance (88.1%). At baseline, there were significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and presence of glomerular crescents between both groups (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). After completion of induction therapy, there was no significant difference in remission status (76.0% versus 87.5%; <i>p</i>=0.33) or relapse status (8.1% versus 10.3%; <i>p</i>=0.22) for the IVCYC and MMF groups, respectively. Mortality rate for the IVCYC group was 5.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up compared to 1.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up for the MMF group (<i>p</i>=0.11), and there was no significant difference in infection-related adverse events between both groups. Estimated GFR at baseline was the only predictor of death (OR: 1.0 [0.9-1.0]; <i>p</i>=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows similar outcomes following induction treatment with MMF or IVCYC in patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN in South Africa. However, a prospective and randomized study is needed to adequately assess these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"2412396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/2412396","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2412396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) can be complicated with requirement for kidney replacement therapy and death. Efficacy of induction therapies using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) has been reported from studies, but there is limited data in Africans comparing both treatments in patients with proliferative LN.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN diagnosed and treated with either MMF or IVCYC in a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa, over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was attaining complete remission after completion of induction therapy.

Results: Of the 84 patients included, mean age was 29.6 ± 10.4 years and there was a female preponderance (88.1%). At baseline, there were significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and presence of glomerular crescents between both groups (p ≤ 0.05). After completion of induction therapy, there was no significant difference in remission status (76.0% versus 87.5%; p=0.33) or relapse status (8.1% versus 10.3%; p=0.22) for the IVCYC and MMF groups, respectively. Mortality rate for the IVCYC group was 5.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up compared to 1.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up for the MMF group (p=0.11), and there was no significant difference in infection-related adverse events between both groups. Estimated GFR at baseline was the only predictor of death (OR: 1.0 [0.9-1.0]; p=0.001).

Conclusion: This study shows similar outcomes following induction treatment with MMF or IVCYC in patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN in South Africa. However, a prospective and randomized study is needed to adequately assess these outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较诱导疗法治疗南非增生性狼疮性肾炎患者的疗效和安全性。
背景:狼疮性肾炎(LN)可并发肾替代治疗和死亡。已有研究报道了使用霉酚酸酯(MMF)或静脉注射环磷酰胺(IVCYC)诱导治疗的疗效,但在非洲比较两种治疗方法对增殖性LN患者的疗效的数据有限。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,在南非开普敦的一个中心,对活检证实的增生性LN患者进行了5年的诊断和MMF或IVCYC治疗。主要结果是诱导治疗完成后获得完全缓解。结果:84例患者平均年龄29.6±10.4岁,女性占88.1%。在基线时,两组患者肾小球滤过率(eGFR)估计值和肾小球新月的存在差异有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。诱导治疗完成后,缓解状态无显著差异(76.0% vs 87.5%;P =0.33)或复发状态(8.1% vs 10.3%;p=0.22),分别为IVCYC和MMF组。IVCYC组的死亡率为每10,000人-天随访5.5例,而MMF组为每10,000人-天随访1.5例(p=0.11),两组之间感染相关不良事件无显著差异。基线时估计的GFR是死亡的唯一预测因子(OR: 1.0 [0.9-1.0];p = 0.001)。结论:这项研究显示,在南非活检证实的增生性LN患者中,MMF或IVCYC诱导治疗的结果相似。然而,需要一项前瞻性和随机研究来充分评估这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Nephrology
International Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nephrology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of kidney diseases and associated disorders. The journal welcomes submissions related to cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pathophysiology of renal disease and progression, clinical nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信