Coping with the Challenges of COVID-19 Using the Sociotype Framework: A Rehearsal for the Next Pandemic.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wen Peng, Elliot M Berry
{"title":"Coping with the Challenges of COVID-19 Using the Sociotype Framework: A Rehearsal for the Next Pandemic.","authors":"Wen Peng, Elliot M Berry","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The world, as a global village, is currently taking part in a real-time public health, medical, socio-cultural, and economic experiment on how best to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary measures. Depending on the time from the outbreak, strategies have ranged from minimal intervention to mitigation by quarantine for high-risk groups (elderly with chronic illnesses) to containment and lockdown. Adherence to such restrictions have depended on the individual and national psyche and culture. One can understand and forgive governments for being over-cautious, but not for being ill-prepared. It seems that Singapore after SARS (2003) and South Korea after MERS (2015) learnt from their experiences and have fared relatively well with minimal disruption to daily routines. Coping with the challenge of COVID-19 is an urgent global task. We use the Sociotype ecological framework to analyze different coping responses at three levels: Context (government and leadership, social context, health services, and media); Relationships; and the Individual. We describe the many negative outcomes (e.g. mortality [obviously], unemployment, economic damage, food insecurity, threat to democracy, claustrophobia) and the positive ones (e.g. new, remote teaching, working, and medical routines; social bonding and solidarity; redefining existential values and priorities) of this surreal situation, which is still evolving. We highlight the importance of humor in stress reduction. Regular and reliable communication to the public has to be improved, acknowledging incomplete data, and learning to deal with fake news, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Excess mortality is the preferred statistic to follow and compare outcomes. When the health risks are over, the economic recovery responses will vary according to the financial state of countries. If world order is to be reshaped, then a massive economic aid plan should be launched by the rich countries-akin to the Marshall plan after the Second World War. It should be led preferably by the USA and China. The results of the tradeoffs between health and economic lockdowns will only become apparent in the months to come. The experiences and lessons learned from this emergency should be used as a rehearsal for the next epi-/pandemic, which will surely take place in the foreseeable future.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835120/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The world, as a global village, is currently taking part in a real-time public health, medical, socio-cultural, and economic experiment on how best to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Extraordinary times demand extraordinary measures. Depending on the time from the outbreak, strategies have ranged from minimal intervention to mitigation by quarantine for high-risk groups (elderly with chronic illnesses) to containment and lockdown. Adherence to such restrictions have depended on the individual and national psyche and culture. One can understand and forgive governments for being over-cautious, but not for being ill-prepared. It seems that Singapore after SARS (2003) and South Korea after MERS (2015) learnt from their experiences and have fared relatively well with minimal disruption to daily routines. Coping with the challenge of COVID-19 is an urgent global task. We use the Sociotype ecological framework to analyze different coping responses at three levels: Context (government and leadership, social context, health services, and media); Relationships; and the Individual. We describe the many negative outcomes (e.g. mortality [obviously], unemployment, economic damage, food insecurity, threat to democracy, claustrophobia) and the positive ones (e.g. new, remote teaching, working, and medical routines; social bonding and solidarity; redefining existential values and priorities) of this surreal situation, which is still evolving. We highlight the importance of humor in stress reduction. Regular and reliable communication to the public has to be improved, acknowledging incomplete data, and learning to deal with fake news, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Excess mortality is the preferred statistic to follow and compare outcomes. When the health risks are over, the economic recovery responses will vary according to the financial state of countries. If world order is to be reshaped, then a massive economic aid plan should be launched by the rich countries-akin to the Marshall plan after the Second World War. It should be led preferably by the USA and China. The results of the tradeoffs between health and economic lockdowns will only become apparent in the months to come. The experiences and lessons learned from this emergency should be used as a rehearsal for the next epi-/pandemic, which will surely take place in the foreseeable future.

Abstract Image

利用社会类型框架应对COVID-19的挑战:下一次大流行的预演。
作为一个地球村,世界目前正在参与一场关于如何最好地抗击COVID-19大流行的实时公共卫生、医疗、社会文化和经济实验。非常时期需要非常措施。根据疫情爆发的时间,采取的策略包括从最低限度的干预到通过隔离高危人群(患有慢性病的老年人)来缓解疫情,再到遏制和封锁。遵守这些限制取决于个人和国家的心理和文化。人们可以理解并原谅政府的过度谨慎,但不能原谅政府的准备不足。非典(2003)后的新加坡和MERS(2015)后的韩国似乎吸取了经验教训,并在日常生活受到最小干扰的情况下表现得相对较好。应对新冠肺炎疫情挑战是一项紧迫的全球性任务。我们使用社会类型生态框架从三个层面分析不同的应对反应:环境(政府和领导、社会环境、卫生服务和媒体);关系;和个人。我们描述了许多消极的结果(例如死亡率[显然],失业,经济损失,粮食不安全,对民主的威胁,幽闭恐惧症)和积极的结果(例如新的,远程教学,工作和医疗程序;社会联系和团结;重新定义存在的价值和优先事项),这种超现实的情况仍在演变。我们强调幽默在减压中的重要性。必须改善与公众定期和可靠的沟通,承认数据不完整,并学会处理假新闻、错误信息和阴谋论。超额死亡率是跟踪和比较结果的首选统计数据。当健康风险结束后,经济复苏对策将根据各国的财政状况而有所不同。如果要重塑世界秩序,那么富国就应该启动一项大规模的经济援助计划——类似于二战后的马歇尔计划。最好由美国和中国领导。在健康和经济封锁之间权衡的结果只会在未来几个月显现出来。从这次紧急情况中吸取的经验和教训应被用作下一次扩大/大流行的预演,而下一次大流行肯定会在可预见的将来发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信