Sperm viability varies with buffer and genotype in Drosophila melanogaster.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-08 DOI:10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592
Ruijian Guo, Anna-Lena Henke, Klaus Reinhardt
{"title":"Sperm viability varies with buffer and genotype in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.","authors":"Ruijian Guo,&nbsp;Anna-Lena Henke,&nbsp;Klaus Reinhardt","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sperm quality, an important male fitness trait, is commonly compared between studies. However, few studies consider how genetic and environmental variation affect sperm quality, even in the genetic model <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. Here we show that sperm viability, the proportion of live sperm, differed across the genotypes Oregon-R, Dahomey, and Canton-S by more than 15%, and across buffers (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Grace's Medium and <i>Drosophila</i> Ringer solution) by more than 20%. In terms of genotype-buffer pair comparisons, nearly half of the comparisons would produce significant differences in sperm viability (15 in 36), or its temporal decrease in a stress medium (19 in 36). Grace's medium produced the longest-lived sperm <i>in vitro</i> and the smallest differences between genotypes, <i>Drosophila</i> Ringer Solution produced the shortest lifespan and the largest differences. Our results suggest that fly and other sperm researchers would benefit from a standardized protocol of measuring sperm viability.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2020.1837592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sperm quality, an important male fitness trait, is commonly compared between studies. However, few studies consider how genetic and environmental variation affect sperm quality, even in the genetic model Drosophila melanogaster. Here we show that sperm viability, the proportion of live sperm, differed across the genotypes Oregon-R, Dahomey, and Canton-S by more than 15%, and across buffers (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Grace's Medium and Drosophila Ringer solution) by more than 20%. In terms of genotype-buffer pair comparisons, nearly half of the comparisons would produce significant differences in sperm viability (15 in 36), or its temporal decrease in a stress medium (19 in 36). Grace's medium produced the longest-lived sperm in vitro and the smallest differences between genotypes, Drosophila Ringer Solution produced the shortest lifespan and the largest differences. Our results suggest that fly and other sperm researchers would benefit from a standardized protocol of measuring sperm viability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

黑腹果蝇精子活力随缓冲液和基因型的不同而不同。
精子质量是一项重要的男性健康特征,经常在研究之间进行比较。然而,很少有研究考虑遗传和环境变化如何影响精子质量,即使在遗传模型果蝇中也是如此。在这里,我们发现精子活力(活精子的比例)在基因型Oregon-R、Dahomey和Canton-S之间的差异超过15%,在缓冲液(磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)、Grace培养基和果蝇林格溶液)之间的差异超过20%。在基因型-缓冲对比较方面,近一半的比较会产生显著的精子活力差异(36例中有15例),或者在应激介质中精子活力降低(36例中有19例)。格雷斯培养基在体外产生的精子寿命最长,基因型之间的差异最小,而果蝇林格溶液产生的精子寿命最短,差异最大。我们的研究结果表明,苍蝇和其他精子研究人员将受益于测量精子活力的标准化协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信