The Impact of Diplopia on Reading.

Q3 Medicine
Beckie Lijka, Sonia Toor, Gemma Arblaster
{"title":"The Impact of Diplopia on Reading.","authors":"Beckie Lijka,&nbsp;Sonia Toor,&nbsp;Gemma Arblaster","doi":"10.22599/bioj.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the effect of induced vertical diplopia (small and large separation) on reading speed and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Radner Reading Chart (RRC) was used to measure reading speed (correct words per minute (wpm)) and accuracy (percentage). Accuracy was measured using two different methods: 'accuracy-omission' where only the omission of a word reduced the score, and 'accuracy-addition and omission' where any error reduced the score. Three viewing conditions were created using Fresnel prisms on plano glasses: a control condition without diplopia (6 prism dioptres (Δ) base up (BU) over each eye), small separation vertical diplopia (3Δ BU right eye and 3Δ base down (BD) left eye) and large separation vertical diplopia (6Δ BU right eye and 6Δ BD left eye). Viewing conditions were counterbalanced to minimise order effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four participants were included with a mean age of 20.1 years. The mean reading speed in the control condition was 156.90 wpm. Both diplopic conditions significantly reduced the reading speed compared to the control condition, small separation diplopia to 62.75 wpm (p < 0.001) and large separation diplopia to 105.71 wpm (p < 0.001). The mean reading speed with small separation diplopia was significantly slower than the mean reading speed with large separation diplopia (p < 0.01). Median accuracy scores in the control and the large separation diplopia conditions were 100% using both methods of measuring accuracy. The small separation diplopia condition significantly reduced accuracy to 92.86% (accuracy-omission method) and to 57.50% (accuracy-addition and omission method) compared to the control condition (p < 0.01) and the large separation diplopia condition (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When vertical diplopia was induced using Fresnel prisms, diplopia of smaller separation resulted in the greatest reduction in reading speed and accuracy, compared to without diplopia and large separation diplopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510386/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effect of induced vertical diplopia (small and large separation) on reading speed and accuracy.

Methods: The Radner Reading Chart (RRC) was used to measure reading speed (correct words per minute (wpm)) and accuracy (percentage). Accuracy was measured using two different methods: 'accuracy-omission' where only the omission of a word reduced the score, and 'accuracy-addition and omission' where any error reduced the score. Three viewing conditions were created using Fresnel prisms on plano glasses: a control condition without diplopia (6 prism dioptres (Δ) base up (BU) over each eye), small separation vertical diplopia (3Δ BU right eye and 3Δ base down (BD) left eye) and large separation vertical diplopia (6Δ BU right eye and 6Δ BD left eye). Viewing conditions were counterbalanced to minimise order effects.

Results: Twenty-four participants were included with a mean age of 20.1 years. The mean reading speed in the control condition was 156.90 wpm. Both diplopic conditions significantly reduced the reading speed compared to the control condition, small separation diplopia to 62.75 wpm (p < 0.001) and large separation diplopia to 105.71 wpm (p < 0.001). The mean reading speed with small separation diplopia was significantly slower than the mean reading speed with large separation diplopia (p < 0.01). Median accuracy scores in the control and the large separation diplopia conditions were 100% using both methods of measuring accuracy. The small separation diplopia condition significantly reduced accuracy to 92.86% (accuracy-omission method) and to 57.50% (accuracy-addition and omission method) compared to the control condition (p < 0.01) and the large separation diplopia condition (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: When vertical diplopia was induced using Fresnel prisms, diplopia of smaller separation resulted in the greatest reduction in reading speed and accuracy, compared to without diplopia and large separation diplopia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

复视对阅读的影响。
目的:比较诱发性垂直复视(小间距和大间距)对阅读速度和准确性的影响。方法:采用Radner阅读量表(RRC)测量阅读速度(每分钟正确字数(wpm))和准确率(百分比)。准确度是用两种不同的方法来衡量的:“准确度-遗漏”,只有遗漏一个单词会降低分数;“准确度-添加和遗漏”,任何错误都会降低分数。使用平面眼镜上的菲涅耳棱镜创建三种观看条件:无复视的对照条件(每只眼睛上有6个棱镜(Δ))、小分离垂直复视(3Δ右眼上有BU, 3Δ左眼下有BD)和大分离垂直复视(6Δ右眼上有BU, 6Δ左眼下有BD)。观看条件得到了平衡,以尽量减少秩序效应。结果:24名参与者入组,平均年龄20.1岁。对照条件下的平均阅读速度为156.90 wpm。与对照组相比,两种复视条件下的阅读速度均显著降低,小距离复视为62.75 wpm (p < 0.001),大距离复视为105.71 wpm (p < 0.001)。小距复视组的平均阅读速度显著低于大距复视组的平均阅读速度(p < 0.01)。使用两种方法测量精度,对照组和大间距复视条件下的中位精度得分均为100%。与对照组和大距离复视组相比,小距离复视组的正确率分别为92.86%和57.50% (p < 0.01),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:使用菲涅耳棱镜诱导垂直复视时,相对于无复视和大距离复视,小距离复视对阅读速度和准确性的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信