Pilot Mobile Phone Intervention in Promoting Type 2 Diabetes Management in an Urban Area in Ghana: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions
Ernest Asante, Victoria Bam, Abigail Kusi-Amponsah Diji, Alberta Yemotsoo Lomotey, Agnes Owusu Boateng, Osei Sarfo-Kantanka, Eunice Oparebea Ansah, Dennis Adjei
{"title":"Pilot Mobile Phone Intervention in Promoting Type 2 Diabetes Management in an Urban Area in Ghana: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ernest Asante,&nbsp;Victoria Bam,&nbsp;Abigail Kusi-Amponsah Diji,&nbsp;Alberta Yemotsoo Lomotey,&nbsp;Agnes Owusu Boateng,&nbsp;Osei Sarfo-Kantanka,&nbsp;Eunice Oparebea Ansah,&nbsp;Dennis Adjei","doi":"10.1177/0145721720954070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a nurse-led mobile phone call intervention on glycemic management and adherence to self-management practices among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pilot randomized controlled trial to compare diabetes care as usual to a mobile phone call intervention delivered by nurses in addition to care as usual over a 12-week period in a tertiary referral hospital in Ghana. Sixty patients with T2DM were randomized to either the intervention or the control arm. The intervention group received up to 16 mobile phone calls (mean duration = 12 minutes) from a diabetes specialist nurse in addition to their care as usual. The control group received only care as usual. The primary outcome was the change in A1C over the 12-week period. The secondary outcomes were changes in self-reported adherence to medication and diabetes self-management measures over the 12-week period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean baseline A1C was comparable between the intervention and control groups (9.54%, SD = 2.00% vs 9.07%, SD = 1.72%, <i>P</i> = .334). After 12 weeks, A1C was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group. The difference in mean A1C in the control group rose by +0.26 ± 1.30% (<i>P</i> = .282; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.75), whereas that of the intervention group reduced by -1.51 ± 2.67% (<i>P</i> = .004; 95% CI, -2.51 to -0.51). No improvements in self-management were recorded in the control group. In the intervention group, however, the only significant improvement was recorded in the area of foot care practices. Participant recruitment and retention were 100% without any attrition. About 87% (n = 26) of the intervention group completed at least 70% (≥11) of the calls. At the end of the trial, participants who received the intervention rated their satisfaction as 89.3% on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A mobile phone follow-up call by nurses emphasizing adherence to self-management practices is feasible and can improve short- to medium-term glycemic management among patients with T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721720954070","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720954070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a nurse-led mobile phone call intervention on glycemic management and adherence to self-management practices among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Ghana.

Methods: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial to compare diabetes care as usual to a mobile phone call intervention delivered by nurses in addition to care as usual over a 12-week period in a tertiary referral hospital in Ghana. Sixty patients with T2DM were randomized to either the intervention or the control arm. The intervention group received up to 16 mobile phone calls (mean duration = 12 minutes) from a diabetes specialist nurse in addition to their care as usual. The control group received only care as usual. The primary outcome was the change in A1C over the 12-week period. The secondary outcomes were changes in self-reported adherence to medication and diabetes self-management measures over the 12-week period.

Results: Mean baseline A1C was comparable between the intervention and control groups (9.54%, SD = 2.00% vs 9.07%, SD = 1.72%, P = .334). After 12 weeks, A1C was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group. The difference in mean A1C in the control group rose by +0.26 ± 1.30% (P = .282; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.75), whereas that of the intervention group reduced by -1.51 ± 2.67% (P = .004; 95% CI, -2.51 to -0.51). No improvements in self-management were recorded in the control group. In the intervention group, however, the only significant improvement was recorded in the area of foot care practices. Participant recruitment and retention were 100% without any attrition. About 87% (n = 26) of the intervention group completed at least 70% (≥11) of the calls. At the end of the trial, participants who received the intervention rated their satisfaction as 89.3% on average.

Conclusion: A mobile phone follow-up call by nurses emphasizing adherence to self-management practices is feasible and can improve short- to medium-term glycemic management among patients with T2DM.

手机干预在加纳城市地区促进2型糖尿病管理的试点:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究的目的是评估加纳2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中护士主导的移动电话干预血糖管理和自我管理实践依从性的可行性和有效性。方法:这是一项随机对照试验,在加纳的一家三级转诊医院进行为期12周的试验,比较糖尿病照护与护士在照护之外提供的移动电话干预。60例T2DM患者被随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组除了像往常一样接受护理外,还从糖尿病专科护士那里接到多达16个移动电话(平均持续时间= 12分钟)。对照组患者照旧接受治疗。主要终点是12周内糖化血红蛋白的变化。次要结果是在12周期间自我报告的药物依从性和糖尿病自我管理措施的变化。结果:干预组和对照组的平均基线A1C具有可比性(9.54%,SD = 2.00% vs 9.07%, SD = 1.72%, P = 0.334)。12周后,干预组的A1C明显低于对照组。对照组平均A1C差异升高+0.26±1.30% (P = 0.282;95% CI, -0.23 ~ 0.75),干预组下降-1.51±2.67% (P = 0.004;95% CI, -2.51 ~ -0.51)。对照组在自我管理方面没有任何改善。然而,在干预组中,唯一显著的改善记录在足部护理实践领域。参与者的招募和保留率为100%,没有任何人员流失。约87% (n = 26)的干预组完成了至少70%(≥11)的电话。在试验结束时,接受干预的参与者平均满意度为89.3%。结论:护士通过手机随访强调坚持自我管理的做法是可行的,可以改善T2DM患者中短期血糖管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Educator
Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Di­abetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary pro­fession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信