Managing Welfare and Antimicrobial-Resistance Issues in Treating Foot-and-Mouth Disease Lesions: A New Therapeutic Approach.

IF 1.7 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2020-10-08 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VMRR.S273788
Peter Windsor, Syseng Khounsy, Francesca Earp, Isabel MacPhillamy, James Young, Russell Bush
{"title":"Managing Welfare and Antimicrobial-Resistance Issues in Treating Foot-and-Mouth Disease Lesions: A New Therapeutic Approach.","authors":"Peter Windsor,&nbsp;Syseng Khounsy,&nbsp;Francesca Earp,&nbsp;Isabel MacPhillamy,&nbsp;James Young,&nbsp;Russell Bush","doi":"10.2147/VMRR.S273788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) causes negative impacts on global food security, the livestock trade, national economies, and farming-family livelihoods, particularly in resource-poor developing countries with inadequate biosecurity and low levels of vaccination from inadequate veterinary services. As smallholder farmers have limited understanding of disease-risk management, their focus in FMD outbreaks is on accessing clinically effective therapies. However, most are provided inappropriate traditional treatments and/or topical or parenteral antibiotics, often delivered by paraveterinarians inadequately trained in antimicrobial custodianship. This results in negative financial impacts on livelihoods plus risks of food safety and development of antimicrobial resistance. We report the use of a novel pain-relief therapy for FMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical examinations in an outbreak of suspected FMD in April 2019 in Muang Khay village in Luang Prabang province, Laos confirmed signs and lesions of severe, subacute, ulcerative glossitis and interdigital dermatitis, typical of FMD. All affected buffalo (n=99) and cattle (n=37) presented for treatment in a population of 238 large ruminants, from 15 of 136 households, were administered a topical anesthetic pain-relief product (PRP) wound gel by spray-on (10-30 mL per animal) formulation developed for aversive husbandry procedures (Tri-Solfen, Animal Ethics, Australia).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment with PRP resulted in immediate improvement in demeanor and locomotion, and no adverse events were observed. On follow-up interview, all owners confirmed that their animals were eating within 2 days and lesions had healed within 5 days. Having experienced the positive clinical impacts of PRP on affected animals, these and surrounding farmers were keen to purchase the PRP for future use. The veterinary authorities rapidly registered the PRP for FMD therapy in Laos due to the observed efficacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest a potential paradigm shift from treating FMD with expensive antimicrobials, which risks antimicrobial resistance, to a new, less expensive therapeutic approach that reduces animal suffering and may motivate farmers to report disease to access treatment. Use of the PRP is suggested as an innovation that may improve future FMD management, particularly in developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":75300,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"11 ","pages":"99-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/VMRR.S273788","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S273788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) causes negative impacts on global food security, the livestock trade, national economies, and farming-family livelihoods, particularly in resource-poor developing countries with inadequate biosecurity and low levels of vaccination from inadequate veterinary services. As smallholder farmers have limited understanding of disease-risk management, their focus in FMD outbreaks is on accessing clinically effective therapies. However, most are provided inappropriate traditional treatments and/or topical or parenteral antibiotics, often delivered by paraveterinarians inadequately trained in antimicrobial custodianship. This results in negative financial impacts on livelihoods plus risks of food safety and development of antimicrobial resistance. We report the use of a novel pain-relief therapy for FMD.

Methods: Clinical examinations in an outbreak of suspected FMD in April 2019 in Muang Khay village in Luang Prabang province, Laos confirmed signs and lesions of severe, subacute, ulcerative glossitis and interdigital dermatitis, typical of FMD. All affected buffalo (n=99) and cattle (n=37) presented for treatment in a population of 238 large ruminants, from 15 of 136 households, were administered a topical anesthetic pain-relief product (PRP) wound gel by spray-on (10-30 mL per animal) formulation developed for aversive husbandry procedures (Tri-Solfen, Animal Ethics, Australia).

Results: Treatment with PRP resulted in immediate improvement in demeanor and locomotion, and no adverse events were observed. On follow-up interview, all owners confirmed that their animals were eating within 2 days and lesions had healed within 5 days. Having experienced the positive clinical impacts of PRP on affected animals, these and surrounding farmers were keen to purchase the PRP for future use. The veterinary authorities rapidly registered the PRP for FMD therapy in Laos due to the observed efficacy.

Discussion: These findings suggest a potential paradigm shift from treating FMD with expensive antimicrobials, which risks antimicrobial resistance, to a new, less expensive therapeutic approach that reduces animal suffering and may motivate farmers to report disease to access treatment. Use of the PRP is suggested as an innovation that may improve future FMD management, particularly in developing countries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

管理福利和抗微生物药物耐药性问题在治疗口蹄疫病变:一种新的治疗方法。
口蹄疫(FMD)对全球粮食安全、牲畜贸易、国民经济和农业家庭生计造成负面影响,特别是在生物安全不足、兽医服务不足导致疫苗接种水平低的资源贫乏发展中国家。由于小农对疾病风险管理的了解有限,他们在口蹄疫暴发中的重点是获得临床有效的治疗方法。然而,大多数患者接受的是不适当的传统治疗和/或局部或肠外抗生素,这些治疗通常由在抗菌药物管理方面培训不足的辅助兽医提供。这对生计造成了负面的财务影响,并增加了食品安全和抗微生物药物耐药性的风险。我们报告使用一种新的疼痛缓解治疗口蹄疫。方法:对2019年4月在老挝琅勃拉邦省Muang Khay村暴发的一起疑似口蹄疫疫情进行临床检查,确认为口蹄疫典型的严重、亚急性、溃疡性舌炎和指间皮炎的体征和病变。在136个家庭中的15个家庭的238只大型反刍动物中,所有受影响的水牛(n=99)和牛(n=37)接受治疗,通过喷雾剂(每只动物10-30毫升)配方(Tri-Solfen,动物伦理,澳大利亚)使用表面麻醉止痛产品(PRP)伤口凝胶。结果:PRP治疗可立即改善患者的行为举止和运动能力,无不良事件发生。在随访中,所有的主人都证实他们的动物在2天内进食,病变在5天内愈合。在经历了PRP对患病动物的积极临床影响后,这些农民和周围的农民都热衷于购买PRP以备将来使用。鉴于观察到的疗效,老挝兽医当局迅速将PRP登记为口蹄疫治疗药物。讨论:这些发现表明,从使用昂贵的抗微生物药物治疗口蹄疫(有可能产生抗微生物药物耐药性)到使用一种新的、更便宜的治疗方法,这种方法可以减少动物的痛苦,并可能促使农民报告疾病以获得治疗。建议使用PRP作为一项创新,可以改善未来的口蹄疫管理,特别是在发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信