Developing a Triage Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in a Public Health Emergency.

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Clinical Ethics Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Benjamin Tolchin, Stephen R Latham, Lori Bruce, Lauren E Ferrante, Katherine Kraschel, Karen Jubanyik, Sarah C Hull, Jennifer L Herbst, Jennifer Kapo, Ernest D Moritz, John Hughes, Mark D Siegel, Mark R Mercurio
{"title":"Developing a Triage Protocol for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in a Public Health Emergency.","authors":"Benjamin Tolchin,&nbsp;Stephen R Latham,&nbsp;Lori Bruce,&nbsp;Lauren E Ferrante,&nbsp;Katherine Kraschel,&nbsp;Karen Jubanyik,&nbsp;Sarah C Hull,&nbsp;Jennifer L Herbst,&nbsp;Jennifer Kapo,&nbsp;Ernest D Moritz,&nbsp;John Hughes,&nbsp;Mark D Siegel,&nbsp;Mark R Mercurio","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has caused shortages of life-sustaining medical resources, and future waves of the virus may cause further scarcity. The Yale New Haven Health System developed a triage protocol to allocate scarce medical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the primary goal of saving the most lives possible, and a secondary goal of making triage assessments and decisions consistent, transparent, and fair. We outline the process of developing the triage protocol, summarize the protocol itself, and discuss the major ethical challenges encountered, along with our answers to these challenges. These challenges include (1) the role of age and chronic comorbidities; (2) evaluating children and pregnant patients; (3) racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health; (4) prioritization of healthcare workers; and (5) balancing clinical judgment versus protocolized assessments. We conclude with a review of the limitations of our protocol and the lessons learned. We hope that a robust public discussion of such protocols and the ethical challenges that they raise will result in the fairest possible processes, less need for triage, and more lives saved during future waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and similar public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":39646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"303-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has caused shortages of life-sustaining medical resources, and future waves of the virus may cause further scarcity. The Yale New Haven Health System developed a triage protocol to allocate scarce medical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the primary goal of saving the most lives possible, and a secondary goal of making triage assessments and decisions consistent, transparent, and fair. We outline the process of developing the triage protocol, summarize the protocol itself, and discuss the major ethical challenges encountered, along with our answers to these challenges. These challenges include (1) the role of age and chronic comorbidities; (2) evaluating children and pregnant patients; (3) racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health; (4) prioritization of healthcare workers; and (5) balancing clinical judgment versus protocolized assessments. We conclude with a review of the limitations of our protocol and the lessons learned. We hope that a robust public discussion of such protocols and the ethical challenges that they raise will result in the fairest possible processes, less need for triage, and more lives saved during future waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and similar public health emergencies.

制定COVID-19大流行的分类方案:在突发公共卫生事件中分配稀缺的医疗资源。
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)已经造成维持生命的医疗资源短缺,未来的病毒浪潮可能会造成进一步的短缺。耶鲁大学纽黑文卫生系统制定了一项分诊协议,以在COVID-19大流行期间分配稀缺的医疗资源,其主要目标是尽可能挽救最多的生命,次要目标是使分诊评估和决策一致、透明和公平。我们概述了制定分诊方案的过程,总结了方案本身,并讨论了遇到的主要伦理挑战,以及我们对这些挑战的回答。这些挑战包括:(1)年龄和慢性合并症的作用;(2)评估儿童和孕妇患者;(3)种族、民族和社会经济在健康方面的差异;(4)优先考虑卫生保健工作者;(5)平衡临床判断与协议化评估。最后,我们回顾了我们的方案的局限性和吸取的教训。我们希望,对此类协议及其带来的伦理挑战进行强有力的公开讨论,将导致尽可能公平的程序,减少分诊需求,并在未来的COVID-19大流行浪潮和类似的公共卫生紧急情况中挽救更多生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Ethics
Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信