Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to in vitro fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion.

IF 3.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Therapeutic advances in reproductive health Pub Date : 2020-10-08 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2633494120954248
Jeffrey W Wang, Gabriella M Rustia, Mary Wood-Molo, Jordan Tasse, David Tabriz, Ulku C Turba, Bulent Arslan, Sreekumar Madassery
{"title":"Conception rates after fluoroscopy-guided fallopian tubal cannulation: an alternative to <i>in vitro</i> fertilization for patients with tubal occlusion.","authors":"Jeffrey W Wang,&nbsp;Gabriella M Rustia,&nbsp;Mary Wood-Molo,&nbsp;Jordan Tasse,&nbsp;David Tabriz,&nbsp;Ulku C Turba,&nbsp;Bulent Arslan,&nbsp;Sreekumar Madassery","doi":"10.1177/2633494120954248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and tubal patency and its association with technical success and associated pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated fallopian tube recanalization procedures performed at a single center in a 24-year period. A total of 160 couples undergoing a basic infertility evaluation were included. Hysterosalpingography with high pressure contrast injection followed by selective contrast, guidewire catheterization at the tubal ostium, and/or microcatheter/microwire recanalization were performed. Comparisons of the tubal fertilization rate by relevant characteristics were tested for statistical significance with <i>t</i> tests for continuous data or with Pearson chi-square tests for categorical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success rate was 94% (319 of 341 tubes). High pressure contrast injection alone (184 of 341, 54%), selective catheterization (40%), and microcatheter/microwire (6%) interventions yielded technical success rates of 98%, 90%, and 73%, respectively. The overall rate of conception was 35% (17 of 48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current techniques of fallopian tube recanalization offer a desirable and safe option with high technical success for patients seeking treatment for infertility due to proximal fallopian tube obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":75219,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2633494120954248","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120954248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies show good technical success rates for fallopian tube recanalization. Scarce literature exists regarding advance techniques currently used by interventional radiologists during fallopian tube recanalization procedures. This study investigates the level of intervention and tubal patency and its association with technical success and associated pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated fallopian tube recanalization procedures performed at a single center in a 24-year period. A total of 160 couples undergoing a basic infertility evaluation were included. Hysterosalpingography with high pressure contrast injection followed by selective contrast, guidewire catheterization at the tubal ostium, and/or microcatheter/microwire recanalization were performed. Comparisons of the tubal fertilization rate by relevant characteristics were tested for statistical significance with t tests for continuous data or with Pearson chi-square tests for categorical data.

Results: Technical success rate was 94% (319 of 341 tubes). High pressure contrast injection alone (184 of 341, 54%), selective catheterization (40%), and microcatheter/microwire (6%) interventions yielded technical success rates of 98%, 90%, and 73%, respectively. The overall rate of conception was 35% (17 of 48).

Conclusion: Current techniques of fallopian tube recanalization offer a desirable and safe option with high technical success for patients seeking treatment for infertility due to proximal fallopian tube obstruction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

透视引导下输卵管插管后受孕率:输卵管阻塞患者体外受精的替代方法。
目的:以往的研究表明输卵管再通术的技术成功率较高。目前关于介入放射科医生在输卵管再通手术中使用的先进技术的文献很少。本研究探讨干预水平和输卵管通畅及其与技术成功和相关妊娠结局的关系。方法:我们回顾性评估了24年来在单一中心进行的输卵管再通手术。共有160对夫妇接受了基本的不孕症评估。进行子宫输卵管造影,高压造影剂注射,然后选择性造影剂,在输卵管口导丝插管,和/或微导管/微丝再通。连续资料用t检验,分类资料用Pearson卡方检验,输卵管受精率与相关特征的比较有统计学意义。结果:技术成功率为94%(341管319管)。单独高压造影剂注射(341例中的184例,54%)、选择性置管(40%)和微导管/微丝(6%)干预的技术成功率分别为98%、90%和73%。总受孕率为35%(17 / 48)。结论:目前的输卵管再通技术为输卵管近端梗阻不孕症患者提供了一种理想、安全、技术成功率高的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信