Nick Goelen, Pieter Janssen, Jan Tack, John Morales, Tine Honinx, Greet Van den Berghe, Michael P Casaer, Jan Gunst
{"title":"Continuous Assessment of Gastric Motility and Its Relation to Gastric Emptying in Adult Critically Ill Patients.","authors":"Nick Goelen, Pieter Janssen, Jan Tack, John Morales, Tine Honinx, Greet Van den Berghe, Michael P Casaer, Jan Gunst","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients frequently develop feeding intolerance, which is difficult to predict. In healthy subjects, gastric motility, assessed by nasogastric balloon tube, correlated with gastric emptying. We now investigated this correlation in critically ill patients, as well as the feasibility and safety of such application in a pilot study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Endotracheally intubated adults scheduled to receive enteral nutrition (EN) were included. After insertion of a double-lumen nasogastric balloon tube and radiographic confirmation of position, balloon pressure was recorded for 10 hours after inflation (4 hours fasted, 2 hours during administration of <sup>13</sup> C-labeled EN, and 4 hours postprandially). Gastric motility was expressed as Gastric Balloon Motility Index (GBMI), reflecting the fraction of time in which phasic gastric contractions occurred. Gastric emptying was assessed by <sup>13</sup> C-octanoate breath test and expressed as gastric half-emptying time (GET½). Correlation between GBMI (assessed in different time intervals) and GET½ was investigated by Pearson/Spearman correlation. Feasibility was defined as the success of tube placement and pressure recording. Safety was assessed based on adverse device effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 19 had paired GBMI and GET½ data. There was no correlation between GBMI and GET½. The tube was successfully placed in 28/30 (93.3%) patients. In 3/28 (10.7%) patients, balloon leakage precluded analysis. Two safety events were directly linked to the device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study showed no significant correlation between balloon-assessed gastric motility and emptying in critically ill patients. The feasibility/safety profile of the balloon tube appears similar to that of standard nasogastric tubes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520701,"journal":{"name":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1779-1784"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jpen.2037","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background: Critically ill patients frequently develop feeding intolerance, which is difficult to predict. In healthy subjects, gastric motility, assessed by nasogastric balloon tube, correlated with gastric emptying. We now investigated this correlation in critically ill patients, as well as the feasibility and safety of such application in a pilot study.
Methods: Endotracheally intubated adults scheduled to receive enteral nutrition (EN) were included. After insertion of a double-lumen nasogastric balloon tube and radiographic confirmation of position, balloon pressure was recorded for 10 hours after inflation (4 hours fasted, 2 hours during administration of 13 C-labeled EN, and 4 hours postprandially). Gastric motility was expressed as Gastric Balloon Motility Index (GBMI), reflecting the fraction of time in which phasic gastric contractions occurred. Gastric emptying was assessed by 13 C-octanoate breath test and expressed as gastric half-emptying time (GET½). Correlation between GBMI (assessed in different time intervals) and GET½ was investigated by Pearson/Spearman correlation. Feasibility was defined as the success of tube placement and pressure recording. Safety was assessed based on adverse device effects.
Results: Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 19 had paired GBMI and GET½ data. There was no correlation between GBMI and GET½. The tube was successfully placed in 28/30 (93.3%) patients. In 3/28 (10.7%) patients, balloon leakage precluded analysis. Two safety events were directly linked to the device.
Conclusion: This pilot study showed no significant correlation between balloon-assessed gastric motility and emptying in critically ill patients. The feasibility/safety profile of the balloon tube appears similar to that of standard nasogastric tubes.
背景:危重症患者经常发生喂养不耐受,这是难以预测的。在健康受试者中,胃运动,通过鼻胃球囊管评估,与胃排空相关。我们现在在危重患者中研究了这种相关性,并在一项试点研究中研究了这种应用的可行性和安全性。方法:纳入经气管插管接受肠内营养(EN)的成人。在插入双腔鼻胃球囊管并在x线片上确认位置后,记录充气后10小时的球囊压力(禁食4小时,服用13c标记EN期间2小时,餐后4小时)。胃运动以胃球囊运动指数(GBMI)表示,反映胃发生阶段性收缩的时间比例。13 c -辛酸呼气试验评估胃排空情况,以胃半排空时间(GET½)表示。采用Pearson/Spearman相关性研究GBMI(以不同时间间隔评估)与GET½之间的相关性。可行性定义为管的放置和压力记录的成功。安全性是根据器械的不良反应来评估的。结果:30例患者入组,其中19例有GBMI和GET½数据配对。GBMI与GET½之间无相关性。30例患者中有28例(93.3%)置管成功。3/28(10.7%)患者因球囊渗漏无法分析。两起安全事件与该设备直接相关。结论:本初步研究显示危重病人胃动力与排空无显著相关性。球囊管的可行性/安全性与标准鼻胃管相似。