Educational supportive group therapy and the quality of life of hemodialysis patients.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
BioPsychoSocial Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13030-020-00200-z
Sajad Mansouri, Amir Jalali, Mahmoud Rahmati, Nader Salari
{"title":"Educational supportive group therapy and the quality of life of hemodialysis patients.","authors":"Sajad Mansouri,&nbsp;Amir Jalali,&nbsp;Mahmoud Rahmati,&nbsp;Nader Salari","doi":"10.1186/s13030-020-00200-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to physical, mental, and social condition, ESRD and hemodialysis affect the quality of life of patients as well. Psychotherapy and non-pharmaceutical interventions are effective measures to add meaning to life, create a goal and motivation in life, and improve the quality of life in chronic patients. The effect of educational and supportive group therapy on the quality of life (QOL) of hemodialysis patients was examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was carried out as an interventional quasi-experimental study with the participation of 64 patients who were selected through convenience sampling and based on the patient's hemodialysis days (Saturday, Monday, and Wednesday patients as an experimental group and Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday patients as a control group). There were 32 patients in each group. The experimental group received eight 50 min sessions including two sessions per week. The control group received the normal interventions. The participants were assessed using a demographics form and Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form before, immediately after, and 1 month after the intervention. The collected data was analyzed using SPSS (v.24).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean QOL scores of the experimental group before, immediately after, and 4 weeks after the intervention were 36.99, 43.3, and 44.9 respectively. Those of the control group were 36.39, 37.2, and 37.1 respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups before the intervention (<i>P</i> > 0.05); however, the difference between the two groups was significant immediately after and 4 weeks after the intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.0001). The trend of score change in the experimental group was also significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and Tukey ad-hoc test showed significant differences between the scores before intervention and those immediately after and 4 weeks after the intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, educational and supportive group therapy can expand the interpersonal relationships of hemodialysis patients and positively affect their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":9027,"journal":{"name":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13030-020-00200-z","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-020-00200-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: In addition to physical, mental, and social condition, ESRD and hemodialysis affect the quality of life of patients as well. Psychotherapy and non-pharmaceutical interventions are effective measures to add meaning to life, create a goal and motivation in life, and improve the quality of life in chronic patients. The effect of educational and supportive group therapy on the quality of life (QOL) of hemodialysis patients was examined.

Methods: The study was carried out as an interventional quasi-experimental study with the participation of 64 patients who were selected through convenience sampling and based on the patient's hemodialysis days (Saturday, Monday, and Wednesday patients as an experimental group and Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday patients as a control group). There were 32 patients in each group. The experimental group received eight 50 min sessions including two sessions per week. The control group received the normal interventions. The participants were assessed using a demographics form and Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form before, immediately after, and 1 month after the intervention. The collected data was analyzed using SPSS (v.24).

Results: The mean QOL scores of the experimental group before, immediately after, and 4 weeks after the intervention were 36.99, 43.3, and 44.9 respectively. Those of the control group were 36.39, 37.2, and 37.1 respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups before the intervention (P > 0.05); however, the difference between the two groups was significant immediately after and 4 weeks after the intervention (P = 0.0001). The trend of score change in the experimental group was also significant (p < 0.05), and Tukey ad-hoc test showed significant differences between the scores before intervention and those immediately after and 4 weeks after the intervention (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: In general, educational and supportive group therapy can expand the interpersonal relationships of hemodialysis patients and positively affect their quality of life.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

教育支持团体治疗与血液透析患者生活质量的关系。
背景:除了身体、心理和社会状况外,ESRD和血液透析也会影响患者的生活质量。心理治疗和非药物干预是增加生活意义、创造生活目标和动力、改善慢性患者生活质量的有效措施。观察教育和支持团体治疗对血液透析患者生活质量的影响。方法:采用介入性准实验研究的方式,根据患者血液透析天数,采用方便抽样的方法选取64例患者(周六、周一、周三患者为实验组,周日、周二、周四患者为对照组)。每组32例。实验组接受8次50分钟的训练,包括每周两次。对照组接受正常干预。在干预前、干预后和干预后1个月,使用人口统计表格和肾脏疾病生活质量短表对参与者进行评估。收集的数据使用SPSS (v.24)进行分析。结果:实验组干预前、干预后立即、干预后4周的平均生活质量评分分别为36.99、43.3、44.9。对照组分别为36.39、37.2、37.1。干预前两组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);然而,两组在干预后立即和干预后4周的差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0001)。结论:总体而言,教育和支持性团体治疗可以扩大血透患者的人际关系,对患者的生活质量产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BioPsychoSocial Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the interrelationships between the biological, psychological, social, and behavioral factors of health and illness. BioPsychoSocial Medicine is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine, and publishes research on psychosomatic disorders and diseases that are characterized by objective organic changes and/or functional changes that could be induced, progressed, aggravated, or exacerbated by psychological, social, and/or behavioral factors and their associated psychosomatic treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信