Does Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis induce myelosuppression in primary immune deficiency disease patients; A retrospective, 3 groups comparative study.
{"title":"Does Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis induce myelosuppression in primary immune deficiency disease patients; A retrospective, 3 groups comparative study.","authors":"Reem Elajez, Sabha Nisar, Mehdi Adeli","doi":"10.12932/AP-050320-0782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The possible myelosuppression side effect of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on primary immune deficiency (PID) patients has not been established yet.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify if the PID patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to the use of TMPSMX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, three groups study, of PID patients (on and off TMP-SMX prophylaxis) and urinary tract infection (UTI) patients received prophylaxis TMP-SMX. Data about CBC results (WBC, ANC, Lymphocytes, RBC, Hemoglobin, and Platelet counts) at baseline, first, and maximum myelosuppression observed during the period of TMP-SMX administration were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients were included in this study (41 PID patients on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, 45 PID patients not on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 36 UTI patients on prophylaxis TMP-SMX). There are significant differences noticed in the percentage of patients who developed clinical myelosuppression (i.e. less than normal value for age) in ANC (39.0% vs. 8.9% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.002), RBC (36.6% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.014), WBC (41.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.003), and platelet (24.4% vs. 15.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.028) in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant difference in myelosuppression between the groups was most likely due to the combination of TMP-SMX effect on PID patients rather than the disease or the drug itself.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary immune deficiency (PID) patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to TMP-SMX prophylaxis (especially ANC) comparing to immune-competent patients or other PID patients who did not receive prophylactic TMP-SMX. Future larger prospective study is required to confirm this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":"353-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-050320-0782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The possible myelosuppression side effect of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on primary immune deficiency (PID) patients has not been established yet.
Objective: Identify if the PID patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to the use of TMPSMX.
Methods: Retrospective, three groups study, of PID patients (on and off TMP-SMX prophylaxis) and urinary tract infection (UTI) patients received prophylaxis TMP-SMX. Data about CBC results (WBC, ANC, Lymphocytes, RBC, Hemoglobin, and Platelet counts) at baseline, first, and maximum myelosuppression observed during the period of TMP-SMX administration were collected.
Results: A total of 122 patients were included in this study (41 PID patients on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, 45 PID patients not on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 36 UTI patients on prophylaxis TMP-SMX). There are significant differences noticed in the percentage of patients who developed clinical myelosuppression (i.e. less than normal value for age) in ANC (39.0% vs. 8.9% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.002), RBC (36.6% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.014), WBC (41.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.003), and platelet (24.4% vs. 15.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.028) in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant difference in myelosuppression between the groups was most likely due to the combination of TMP-SMX effect on PID patients rather than the disease or the drug itself.
Conclusions: Primary immune deficiency (PID) patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to TMP-SMX prophylaxis (especially ANC) comparing to immune-competent patients or other PID patients who did not receive prophylactic TMP-SMX. Future larger prospective study is required to confirm this association.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747
APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume.
APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand.
The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.