Use of Modern Contraceptive Methods in Burkina Faso: What are the Obstacles to Male Involvement in Improving Indicators in the Centre-East and Centre-North Regions?

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Open access journal of contraception Pub Date : 2020-09-28 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S274570
Aristide Romaric Bado, Hermann Badolo, Lamoussa Robert Zoma
{"title":"Use of Modern Contraceptive Methods in Burkina Faso: What are the Obstacles to Male Involvement in Improving Indicators in the Centre-East and Centre-North Regions?","authors":"Aristide Romaric Bado,&nbsp;Hermann Badolo,&nbsp;Lamoussa Robert Zoma","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S274570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Burkina Faso, despite several efforts to improve contraceptive uptake, contraceptive prevalence remains low. Studies suggest that the low levels of family planning (FP) practices can be partially attributed to the low participation of men in reproductive health programmes. Involving men in FP programmes in Burkina Faso is thus imperative, but the obstacles to this are poorly documented. This study has two objectives to explore the perspectives of men and women on barriers to contraceptive use and to identify the strategies to increase male involvement in family planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is a qualitative study using 20 focus groups and 52 in-depth individual interviews in two regions (North Central Region and Central East Region) with a sample of 29 adult men and 23 women who were married and had children or not. Interviews were conducted in Moore (the national language commonly spoken in both regions). All interviews were recorded and transcribed into French using Microsoft Word. Then, content analysis was carried out using the constant comparison method to identify the major themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that men's attitudes are still a significant barrier to women's use of modern contraceptives. The reasons women do not use contraception and men do not adhere to FP programmes include lack of method knowledge, negative beliefs and perceptions about modern contraceptive methods, and the side effects of contraceptives. Cultural norms and preferences for large families are also common barriers to FP. However, the results showed that men's awareness of FP, communication between spouses, and access to FP services can promote men's adherence to FP programmes in the Centre-East and Centre-North regions of Burkina Faso.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efforts should be made to improve educational standards, especially for men, and reorient FP services to make them more accessible to men.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":"11 ","pages":"147-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/81/oajc-11-147.PMC7532078.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S274570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: In Burkina Faso, despite several efforts to improve contraceptive uptake, contraceptive prevalence remains low. Studies suggest that the low levels of family planning (FP) practices can be partially attributed to the low participation of men in reproductive health programmes. Involving men in FP programmes in Burkina Faso is thus imperative, but the obstacles to this are poorly documented. This study has two objectives to explore the perspectives of men and women on barriers to contraceptive use and to identify the strategies to increase male involvement in family planning.

Methods: It is a qualitative study using 20 focus groups and 52 in-depth individual interviews in two regions (North Central Region and Central East Region) with a sample of 29 adult men and 23 women who were married and had children or not. Interviews were conducted in Moore (the national language commonly spoken in both regions). All interviews were recorded and transcribed into French using Microsoft Word. Then, content analysis was carried out using the constant comparison method to identify the major themes.

Results: The results show that men's attitudes are still a significant barrier to women's use of modern contraceptives. The reasons women do not use contraception and men do not adhere to FP programmes include lack of method knowledge, negative beliefs and perceptions about modern contraceptive methods, and the side effects of contraceptives. Cultural norms and preferences for large families are also common barriers to FP. However, the results showed that men's awareness of FP, communication between spouses, and access to FP services can promote men's adherence to FP programmes in the Centre-East and Centre-North regions of Burkina Faso.

Conclusion: Efforts should be made to improve educational standards, especially for men, and reorient FP services to make them more accessible to men.

在布基纳法索使用现代避孕方法:在中东部和中北部地区,男性参与改善指标的障碍是什么?
导言:在布基纳法索,尽管为提高避孕药具使用率做出了若干努力,但避孕药具普及率仍然很低。研究表明,计划生育实践水平低的部分原因是男子对生殖健康方案的参与程度低。因此,让男性参与布基纳法索的计划生育项目势在必行,但这方面的障碍鲜有记录。这项研究有两个目的,一是探讨男子和妇女对使用避孕药具的障碍的看法,二是确定增加男子参与计划生育的战略。方法:采用20个焦点小组和52个深度个人访谈的定性研究方法,在中北部和中东部两个地区,抽样29名成年男性和23名已婚和无子女的女性。访谈用摩尔语(这两个地区通用的国家语言)进行。所有的采访都被记录下来,并用微软文字处理软件翻译成法语。然后,采用恒值比较法进行内容分析,确定主要主题。结果:结果表明,男性的态度仍然是妇女使用现代避孕药具的重大障碍。妇女不使用避孕措施和男子不遵守计划生育规划的原因包括缺乏方法知识、对现代避孕方法的消极信念和看法以及避孕措施的副作用。文化规范和对大家庭的偏好也是计划生育的常见障碍。然而,结果表明,在布基纳法索的中东部和中北部地区,男性对计划生育的认识、配偶之间的沟通以及获得计划生育服务可以促进男性对计划生育方案的遵守。结论:应努力提高教育水平,特别是男性的教育水平,并重新定位计划生育服务,使其更容易为男性所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信