Reema A Karasneh, Sayer I Al-Azzam, Karem H Alzoubi, Suhaib M Muflih, Sahar S Hawamdeh
{"title":"Smartphone Applications for Period Tracking: Rating and Behavioral Change among Women Users.","authors":"Reema A Karasneh, Sayer I Al-Azzam, Karem H Alzoubi, Suhaib M Muflih, Sahar S Hawamdeh","doi":"10.1155/2020/2192387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of mobile apps for health and well-being has grown exponentially in the last decade, as such apps were reported to be ideal platforms for behavioral change and symptoms monitoring and management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review period tracking applications available at Google Play and Apple App Stores and determine the presence, features, and quality of these smartphone apps. In addition, behavioral changes associated with the top 5 rated apps were assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the Systematic Search Criteria through Google Play Store and iTunes Apple Store, using terms related to period tracking. Apps were scanned for matching the inclusion criteria and the included apps were assessed by two reviewers using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), a tool that was developed for classifying and assessing the quality of mHealth apps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine apps met the inclusion criteria. Most of the apps enabled setting user goals, motivations, and interactivity, tracking multiple symptoms or mood changes, allowed notifications, and used graphs to illustrate the tracking result over a specific period of time. The majority of features and functions within these apps were offered for free, while some apps included limited in-app purchases or needed Internet connection to function. Certain apps were reported by participants to promote behavioral change and increase knowledge and awareness regarding monthly periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Period tracking apps were easy to use and navigate and can hence be readily adopted into routine tracking and management of periods. However, most apps were not based on significant evidence and may need further development to support period-related symptom management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2020 ","pages":"2192387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/2192387","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2192387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
Background: The use of mobile apps for health and well-being has grown exponentially in the last decade, as such apps were reported to be ideal platforms for behavioral change and symptoms monitoring and management.
Objective: This study aimed to systematically review period tracking applications available at Google Play and Apple App Stores and determine the presence, features, and quality of these smartphone apps. In addition, behavioral changes associated with the top 5 rated apps were assessed.
Methods: This study used the Systematic Search Criteria through Google Play Store and iTunes Apple Store, using terms related to period tracking. Apps were scanned for matching the inclusion criteria and the included apps were assessed by two reviewers using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), a tool that was developed for classifying and assessing the quality of mHealth apps.
Results: Forty-nine apps met the inclusion criteria. Most of the apps enabled setting user goals, motivations, and interactivity, tracking multiple symptoms or mood changes, allowed notifications, and used graphs to illustrate the tracking result over a specific period of time. The majority of features and functions within these apps were offered for free, while some apps included limited in-app purchases or needed Internet connection to function. Certain apps were reported by participants to promote behavioral change and increase knowledge and awareness regarding monthly periods.
Conclusions: Period tracking apps were easy to use and navigate and can hence be readily adopted into routine tracking and management of periods. However, most apps were not based on significant evidence and may need further development to support period-related symptom management.
背景:在过去十年中,用于健康和福祉的移动应用程序的使用呈指数级增长,因为据报道这些应用程序是行为改变和症状监测和管理的理想平台。目的:本研究旨在系统审查Google Play和Apple App store中可用的周期跟踪应用,并确定这些智能手机应用的存在、功能和质量。此外,我们还评估了与排名前5的应用相关的行为变化。方法:本研究通过Google Play Store和iTunes Apple Store使用系统搜索标准,使用与经期跟踪相关的术语。扫描应用程序以匹配纳入标准,并由两名评论者使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)对纳入的应用程序进行评估,这是一种用于分类和评估移动健康应用程序质量的工具。结果:49款app符合纳入标准。大多数应用程序支持设置用户目标、动机和交互性,跟踪多种症状或情绪变化,允许通知,并使用图表来说明特定时间段内的跟踪结果。这些应用程序中的大多数特性和功能都是免费提供的,而一些应用程序包含有限的应用内购买或需要互联网连接才能运行。参与者报告说,某些应用程序可以促进行为改变,增加对月经的了解和意识。结论:经期跟踪应用程序易于使用和导航,可用于日常经期跟踪和管理。然而,大多数应用程序都没有基于重要的证据,可能需要进一步开发以支持与经期相关的症状管理。
期刊介绍:
Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.