Barriers to and Enablers of Abortion Provision for Family Physicians Trained in Abortion During Residency.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2020-09-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-13 DOI:10.1363/psrh.12154
Aleza K Summit, Ian Lague, Miranda Dettmann, Marji Gold
{"title":"Barriers to and Enablers of Abortion Provision for Family Physicians Trained in Abortion During Residency.","authors":"Aleza K Summit,&nbsp;Ian Lague,&nbsp;Miranda Dettmann,&nbsp;Marji Gold","doi":"10.1363/psrh.12154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although some family medicine residency programs include routine opt-out training in early abortion, little is known about abortion provision by trainees after residency graduation. A better understanding of the barriers to and enablers of abortion provision by trained family physicians could improve residency training and shape other interventions to increase abortion provision and access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight U.S. family physicians who had received abortion training during residency were interviewed in 2017, between two and seven years after residency graduation. The doctors, identified using databases of abortion-trained physicians maintained by residency programs, were recruited by e-mail. In phone interviews, they described their postresidency abortion provision experiences. All interviews were transcribed, coded and analyzed using Dedoose, and a social-ecological framework was employed to guide investigation and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although many of the physicians were motivated to provide abortion care, only a minority did so. Barriers to and enablers of abortion provision were found on all levels of the social-ecological model-legal, institutional, social and individual-and included state-specific laws and restrictions on federal funding; religious affiliation or policies prohibiting abortion within particular health systems; mentorship, colleagues' support and the stigma of being an abortion provider; and geographic location, time management and individuals' prioritization of abortion provision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical training alone may not be sufficient for family medicine physicians to overcome the barriers to postresidency abortion provision. To increase abortion provision and access, organizations and advocates should work to strengthen enablers of provision, such as strong mentorship and support networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":"52 3","pages":"151-159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1363/psrh.12154","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Context: Although some family medicine residency programs include routine opt-out training in early abortion, little is known about abortion provision by trainees after residency graduation. A better understanding of the barriers to and enablers of abortion provision by trained family physicians could improve residency training and shape other interventions to increase abortion provision and access.

Methods: Twenty-eight U.S. family physicians who had received abortion training during residency were interviewed in 2017, between two and seven years after residency graduation. The doctors, identified using databases of abortion-trained physicians maintained by residency programs, were recruited by e-mail. In phone interviews, they described their postresidency abortion provision experiences. All interviews were transcribed, coded and analyzed using Dedoose, and a social-ecological framework was employed to guide investigation and analysis.

Results: Although many of the physicians were motivated to provide abortion care, only a minority did so. Barriers to and enablers of abortion provision were found on all levels of the social-ecological model-legal, institutional, social and individual-and included state-specific laws and restrictions on federal funding; religious affiliation or policies prohibiting abortion within particular health systems; mentorship, colleagues' support and the stigma of being an abortion provider; and geographic location, time management and individuals' prioritization of abortion provision.

Conclusions: Clinical training alone may not be sufficient for family medicine physicians to overcome the barriers to postresidency abortion provision. To increase abortion provision and access, organizations and advocates should work to strengthen enablers of provision, such as strong mentorship and support networks.

住院期间接受过堕胎培训的家庭医生提供堕胎服务的障碍和促进因素。
背景:虽然一些家庭医学住院医师项目包括常规的早期流产选择退出培训,但对实习医师毕业后的流产提供知之甚少。更好地了解训练有素的家庭医生提供堕胎服务的障碍和推动因素,可以改善住院医师培训,并形成其他干预措施,以增加堕胎服务的提供和获得。方法:2017年,在住院医师毕业后2 - 7年间,对28名在住院医师期间接受过堕胎培训的美国家庭医生进行了访谈。这些医生是通过电子邮件招募的,他们是通过住院医师项目维护的堕胎培训医生数据库确定的。在电话采访中,她们描述了自己卸任后提供堕胎服务的经历。使用Dedoose对所有访谈进行转录、编码和分析,并采用社会生态框架指导调查和分析。结果:虽然许多医生都有提供堕胎护理的动机,但只有少数人这样做。在社会生态模式的各个层面——法律的、制度的、社会的和个人的——都发现了堕胎规定的障碍和推动因素,包括州特有的法律和对联邦资金的限制;宗教信仰或在特定卫生系统内禁止堕胎的政策;指导、同事的支持和作为堕胎提供者的耻辱;地理位置,时间管理和个人优先堕胎的规定。结论:仅靠临床培训可能不足以使家庭医学医生克服住院后流产提供的障碍。为了增加堕胎的提供和获取,各组织和倡导者应努力加强提供堕胎的推动因素,例如强大的指导和支持网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信