Empathy as core to the development of holding and recognition: the case of Garret.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Zelda Gillian Knight
{"title":"Empathy as core to the development of holding and recognition: the case of Garret.","authors":"Zelda Gillian Knight","doi":"10.4081/ripppo.2020.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heinz Kohut investigated empathy in psychoanalysis in the mid-1950s and found it to be a powerful way to connect to, and be with, his patients. Since then, relatively few recent clinical cases of empathy have emerged, while theoretical discussion of empathy seems to be the norm. Moreover, empathy has not been linked to the development of holding and recognition. The Winnicottian notion of the holding metaphor, which describes the mother holding her infant, has been controversial but continues to be used in therapy. Revised by relational theorists, holding is now viewed as co-created within the intersubjective space. Few recent clinical cases exist showing how and what holding looks like in therapy. The concept of recognition, also used in therapy, is defined as the ability to recognize and experience the other as a separate other. Clinical cases showing recognition in therapy are few in number. As far as I know, no clinical cases suggest that empathy is necessary before holding and recognition can emerge. In this paper, identifying these clinical case gaps in the literature, I describe a small verbatim section of a session with my patient, Garret, in which I attempt to; i) show the empathic process, thus adding to the scarcity of clinical cases, and, ii) show the experience of holding and recognition as they emerge in this case, and iii) suggest that empathy is a necessary core process to the development of the experience of holding and recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":44262,"journal":{"name":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","volume":"23 2","pages":"457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/ripppo.2020.457","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2020.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Heinz Kohut investigated empathy in psychoanalysis in the mid-1950s and found it to be a powerful way to connect to, and be with, his patients. Since then, relatively few recent clinical cases of empathy have emerged, while theoretical discussion of empathy seems to be the norm. Moreover, empathy has not been linked to the development of holding and recognition. The Winnicottian notion of the holding metaphor, which describes the mother holding her infant, has been controversial but continues to be used in therapy. Revised by relational theorists, holding is now viewed as co-created within the intersubjective space. Few recent clinical cases exist showing how and what holding looks like in therapy. The concept of recognition, also used in therapy, is defined as the ability to recognize and experience the other as a separate other. Clinical cases showing recognition in therapy are few in number. As far as I know, no clinical cases suggest that empathy is necessary before holding and recognition can emerge. In this paper, identifying these clinical case gaps in the literature, I describe a small verbatim section of a session with my patient, Garret, in which I attempt to; i) show the empathic process, thus adding to the scarcity of clinical cases, and, ii) show the experience of holding and recognition as they emerge in this case, and iii) suggest that empathy is a necessary core process to the development of the experience of holding and recognition.

同理心是保持和认同发展的核心:以Garret为例。
海因茨·科胡特(Heinz Kohut)在20世纪50年代中期对精神分析学中的移情进行了研究,发现这是一种与病人建立联系并与之相处的强大方式。从那以后,最近出现的共情临床病例相对较少,而关于共情的理论讨论似乎是常态。此外,同理心与保持和认可的发展并没有联系。温尼科特(Winnicottian)的抱着隐喻概念,描述母亲抱着她的婴儿,一直存在争议,但仍在治疗中使用。经过关系理论家的修正,持有现在被视为在主体间空间内的共同创造。最近很少有临床病例显示在治疗中保持是怎样的以及什么样子的。认知的概念,也用于治疗,被定义为识别和体验作为一个独立的他者的能力。临床病例在治疗中表现出的认可度很少。据我所知,没有临床案例表明,在保持和认可出现之前,同理心是必要的。在本文中,识别这些临床病例的差距在文献中,我描述了一个小的逐字部分与我的病人,加勒特,其中我试图;1)展示共情过程,从而增加了临床病例的稀缺性;2)展示了在本病例中出现的持有和认可经验;3)表明共情是持有和认可经验发展的必要核心过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
18.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信