Workplace activity classification from shoe-based movement sensors.

BMC biomedical engineering Pub Date : 2020-06-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s42490-020-00042-4
Jonatan Fridolfsson, Daniel Arvidsson, Frithjof Doerks, Theresa J Kreidler, Stefan Grau
{"title":"Workplace activity classification from shoe-based movement sensors.","authors":"Jonatan Fridolfsson,&nbsp;Daniel Arvidsson,&nbsp;Frithjof Doerks,&nbsp;Theresa J Kreidler,&nbsp;Stefan Grau","doi":"10.1186/s42490-020-00042-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High occupational physical activity is associated with lower health. Shoe-based movement sensors can provide an objective measurement of occupational physical activity in a lab setting but the performance of such methods in a free-living environment have not been investigated. The aim of the current study was to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of shoe sensor-based activity classification in an industrial work setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial calibration part was performed with 35 subjects who performed different workplace activities in a structured lab setting while the movement was measured by a shoe-sensor. Three different machine-learning models (random forest (RF), support vector machine and k-nearest neighbour) were trained to classify activities using the collected lab data. In a second validation part, 29 industry workers were followed at work while an observer noted their activities and the movement was captured with a shoe-based movement sensor. The performance of the trained classification models were validated using the free-living workplace data. The RF classifier consistently outperformed the other models with a substantial difference in in the free-living validation. The accuracy of the initial RF classifier was 83% in the lab setting and 43% in the free-living validation. After combining activities that was difficult to discriminate the accuracy increased to 96 and 71% in the lab and free-living setting respectively. In the free-living part, 99% of the collected samples either consisted of stationary activities or walking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Walking and stationary activities can be classified with high accuracy from a shoe-based movement sensor in a free-living occupational setting. The distribution of activities at the workplace should be considered when validating activity classification models in a free-living setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":72425,"journal":{"name":"BMC biomedical engineering","volume":"2 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42490-020-00042-4","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-020-00042-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: High occupational physical activity is associated with lower health. Shoe-based movement sensors can provide an objective measurement of occupational physical activity in a lab setting but the performance of such methods in a free-living environment have not been investigated. The aim of the current study was to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of shoe sensor-based activity classification in an industrial work setting.

Results: An initial calibration part was performed with 35 subjects who performed different workplace activities in a structured lab setting while the movement was measured by a shoe-sensor. Three different machine-learning models (random forest (RF), support vector machine and k-nearest neighbour) were trained to classify activities using the collected lab data. In a second validation part, 29 industry workers were followed at work while an observer noted their activities and the movement was captured with a shoe-based movement sensor. The performance of the trained classification models were validated using the free-living workplace data. The RF classifier consistently outperformed the other models with a substantial difference in in the free-living validation. The accuracy of the initial RF classifier was 83% in the lab setting and 43% in the free-living validation. After combining activities that was difficult to discriminate the accuracy increased to 96 and 71% in the lab and free-living setting respectively. In the free-living part, 99% of the collected samples either consisted of stationary activities or walking.

Conclusions: Walking and stationary activities can be classified with high accuracy from a shoe-based movement sensor in a free-living occupational setting. The distribution of activities at the workplace should be considered when validating activity classification models in a free-living setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于鞋子运动传感器的工作场所活动分类。
背景:高职业体力活动与较低的健康水平相关。基于鞋子的运动传感器可以在实验室环境中提供职业身体活动的客观测量,但这种方法在自由生活环境中的表现尚未得到调查。当前研究的目的是调查可行性和准确性的鞋传感器为基础的活动分类在工业工作环境。结果:最初的校准部分是对35名受试者进行的,他们在一个结构化的实验室环境中进行不同的工作场所活动,同时用鞋子传感器测量运动。三种不同的机器学习模型(随机森林(RF),支持向量机和k近邻)被训练来使用收集的实验室数据对活动进行分类。在第二个验证部分中,29名工业工人在工作时被跟踪,观察员注意到他们的活动,并用基于鞋子的运动传感器捕捉到他们的运动。使用自由生活的工作场所数据验证了训练后的分类模型的性能。RF分类器始终优于其他模型,在自由生活验证方面存在实质性差异。在实验室环境中,初始RF分类器的准确性为83%,在自由生活验证中为43%。结合难以区分的活动后,在实验室和自由生活环境下的准确率分别提高到96%和71%。在自由生活部分,99%的样本要么是固定活动,要么是步行。结论:在自由生活的职业环境中,基于鞋的运动传感器可以高精度地分类行走和静止活动。在自由生活环境中验证活动分类模型时,应考虑工作场所活动的分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信